Posted on 12/02/2003 7:01:29 AM PST by truthandlife
A global summit set for next week in Geneva is expected to provide the venue for a plan to put the Internet under United Nations control.
Developing nations – including China, Syria and Vietnam – are pushing for the U.N. or one of its agencies to regulate the Internet, perhaps as soon as 2005. Diplomats from more than 60 countries plan to take up the issue at the U.N. World Information Summit in Geneva beginning next Wednesday.
At issue are the operations currently run by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, a California group that assigns Internet protocol addresses and oversees major domains, including .com, .net and .org. The group also helps set technical rules for how the Internet operates. Developing nations said their interests would be better served if the Internet were managed by an intergovernmental group, such as the United Nations or one of its arms.
The U.S., represented at the summit by Ambassador David Gross, the State Department's coordinator for international communications and information policy, is opposing the plan.
The summit's goal is to achieve consensus on a draft declaration of principles and draft plan of action, which reportedly includes a recommendation to place the governance of the Internet under the U.N.
"Standardization is one of the essential building blocks of the Information Society," reads the most recent draft of the WSIS Draft Declaration of Principles. "There should be particular emphasis on the development and adoption of international standards."
Leading the effort is China, which allows its own citizens online access, but only with government surveillance. China has so far been joined in its efforts by representatives of Syria, Egypt, Vietnam and South Africa. Other reports suggest Russia, India, Saudi Arabia and Brazil may be on board, too.
Critics of the global Internet idea say certain nations like China want to take away ICANN's duties and place them under governmental auspices, along with increased control over security and content, placing freedom of press and individual freedom of expression at serious risk.
The summit is expected to attract more than 50 heads of state and 6,000 delegates who will address issues from the digital divide to Internet governance.
That's what I was thinking. They've got a lot of nerve wanting to control our internet. Ultimately, it's because they want to control us, isolate us from access to information, isolate us from each other, silence dissenting voices...
What they're really attacking is the First Amendment. The internet provides us with a means to "freedom of assembly" never before seen in all of earth's history and as a bastion of "freedom of speech", "they" can't stand it.
The internet in its current state is a very real threat to any plans the UN may have for global domination. It gives serfs like me way too much power. Knowledge is power. Being a member of a very large community that I can instantly reach out to is power. Having a podium from which I can speak (and speak freely) is power. The UN wants to take that power away.
They'll start with the usual "We must curb hate speech" BS. That'll be their strategy for attacking the internet. They'll start with the obvious ones, like white supremacist sites, then they'll keep going. Religious sites decrying abortion and homosexuality, conservative political sites like FR, pro-Second Amendment sites, etc. will all be on their hit list. (They may use an anti-pornography strategy, too, since there is much to be found on the net.)
In an ideal world (according to the UN) the internet would be taxed into oblivion, on-line sales would just barely limp along, and freedom of speech would be non-existent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.