Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumbling on the Hard-Right
The Washington Times ^ | December 30, 2003 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 12/30/2003 11:44:49 AM PST by GunsareOK

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:02 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

President Bush is beginning to anger certain hard-line conservatives, particularly over fiscal issues, the way his father did in the year before he lost to Bill Clinton in 1992.

It's not clear how deep the dissatisfaction goes, and whether it will translate to damage at the polls in November.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2004elections; bush; conservativevote; cutnosespiteface; electionpresident; gwb2004; twopercenters; votegfordean; wastedvotes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 501-535 next last
To: At _War_With_Liberals
"Absolutely false: Taxes. He cut them." And added them to the deficit. Future taxes.

"Federal interest payments as a percentage of GDP on the National Debt is the lowest it's been since 1979. It's 1.7% of GDP. "

******************************************************

Meaningless relativism- socialist tactic. Expected from a vichy Repub like you.

I forgot to mention and more importantly, that the National Debt as a pecentage of GDP was 45.6% in 1960 and it was 34.3% in 2002.

Vichy Repub? LOL! I voted for PJB, that pitchfork guy, back in 92 primaries. I've given to important facts to put your original quote into some kind of realistic context. Your posts and responses are as meaningless as the snot that you are.

351 posted on 12/30/2003 4:01:09 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: LPM1888
Kind of like making the minimum payment on your credit card bill while you keep increasing the amount borrowed. At this rate we should have the National Debt paid off in a thousand years or so. Our grandchildren are going to hate this generation.

No not really. The national Debt as a pecentage of GDP was 45.6% in 1960 and it was 34.3% in 2002.

352 posted on 12/30/2003 4:03:19 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Be smart, look at the BIG picture!

The BIG picture is something for the suckers to focus on while the con artists slip their hands into our pockets and their knives into our backs.

353 posted on 12/30/2003 4:04:07 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
I think it is the voters who have done wonders for conservatism

And history shows that teach317's candidate that she swoons over(whoever that may be) in 2000 won a 50 state landslide.

Sometimes teach, especially with your rhetoric of animus about Bush signing the partial birth abortion ban on this thread makes me think you are a NEA plant, playing the "disgruntled conservative" bit to the hilt, but you play it so over the top, that you have become a comedic characture of yourself.

354 posted on 12/30/2003 4:04:51 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

Comment #355 Removed by Moderator

To: Dane
Read it again... 10-10-98 and 4-10-97... Passed BOTH Houses... Veto Override vote passes the House BOTH times, and the Senate missed the Override by a handful each time. That Override thing... that's 67 Senators required, by the way, not just 50. It was on the radar for most Americans and the majority of elected representatives before GWB came along.

You are right on one count, though... I did just find a reference to GWB supporting PBA during the campaign. Still, that seems to indicate that he was supporting an issue that was already receiving STRONG support in the electorate AND in both Houses of Congress. Again, that does not make it "his" issue.

356 posted on 12/30/2003 4:06:26 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Once again, Bush appointed a closeted socialist, Bill Frist, to lead the Senate, for a reason. Frist has proposed legislation that makes him the biggest Rep spender of all time. Mainly to the med sector, the NEA lobby, farmers and AIDS lobby.

So "Frist" is Congress? Where are the other 534 member during all of this? Wait, Frist is in the Senate, doesn't a bill need to pass both houses of COngress to go before the President for signature?

You were doing better posting misleading graphs and railing against the capitalist pig in the name of the peasant class than you are calling Senators socialists...

357 posted on 12/30/2003 4:06:48 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: seamole
I am too new to know all.
358 posted on 12/30/2003 4:06:58 PM PST by MEG33 (We Got Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

Comment #359 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole; MEG33
We have lost FReepers in NYC and DC

Barbara Olson, who corresponded with some Freepers was on the plane the islamofascists flew into the Pentagon.

God bless her husband and family. I still miss her being a great voice for conservatives.

360 posted on 12/30/2003 4:10:39 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
"I believe that some form of globalism is inevitable, so we must try to spread our values and our form of government and beat the global socialists at their own game."

You are a globalist.

You were a Dem until 1980, during their radical phase.

That is all I need to know about you. Now I understand you.
361 posted on 12/30/2003 4:12:33 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Lael
Just don't cry in your beer November 3rd, when the Democrat inherits the Oval Office!

The odds of that are very slim with any of the current democrat candidates. About the same as Clinton losing back when the Republicans ran what's his name, Dole I think, against him during his second campaign. Bush doesn't really have to do anything to get re-elected this time. In fact, it would be almost impossible for him to PO enough people between now and the election to end up losing.

362 posted on 12/30/2003 4:13:02 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I am dense..I knew that and theBC Moran story ,too.Thanks
363 posted on 12/30/2003 4:14:33 PM PST by MEG33 (We Got Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Veto Override vote passes the House BOTH times, and the Senate missed the Override by a handful each time. That Override thing... that's 67 Senators required, by the way, not just 50

If you knew anything about politics, that PBA override vote was a given for such Senators such as Feinstein and Lieberman. They could vote for the override knowing it wouldn't pass. The point is that it didn't pass, it lost. It's like the Red Sox getting 10 hits in a game, but still losing to the Yankees who got 7 hits. The Red Sox still lose since they didn't get as many players to home plate as the Yankees did.

But whatever, go on rant with your delusional rationalizations, you only dig yourself a deeper hole.

364 posted on 12/30/2003 4:14:54 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: GunsareOK
"I'm one of the "hard-line conservatives" who won't be voting for Bush."

Ok...whatever.

The one thing that a proud Conservative WON'T do is to beg a RINO to vote Republican.

Maybe someone who has Bush's ear will print out your statement, and show it to the President, and he'll change all of this policies to suit you. Wow...what a concept.

Of course, if you had REALLY been a Republican and REALLY been paying attention, you'll know the "read my lips" debacle was made into something by first liar, bill clinton. The democRATic Congress got Elder Bush in a corner and he was forced to raise those taxes for other concessions...then they used that against him.

Either way, go vote for f**kin' Kerry.
365 posted on 12/30/2003 4:15:11 PM PST by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
Congress is your problem, not the President. Did you hear the President call for renewal of the AWB? No. When COngress brought it up he said if they pass it he'll sign sign it. TIme for Congress to do their freaking job for once.

Gosh, I thought the President could veto a bill that crossed his desk. I didn't know he was magically bound to appove everything Congress sent his way.

Which party held the Presidency - according to you it's the most important part of the Government. That one in 4 sure helped there didn't it?

And which party took over control of both houses of Congress? "According to you it's the most important part of the Government." That "one in 4" helped just a little bit, didn't it, sport?

So you would rather just hand the nominations over to libs?

I am simply pointing out an indisputable fact - the appointment of high court justices by Republican Presidents is not the panacea you suggest. It is certainly no substitute for a President and a Congress that honor the Constitution...

...the problem is how that law is being interpreted as constitutional in the courts.

That is NOT a problem at all, if a President honors the Constitution and vetos the 'law' in the first place.

The point I was trying (in vain I guess) to make was that AWB is not the end all be all of issues, just a symptom of the larger problem you would rather ignore.

Not at all - we simply disagree on the nature of the problem. I see Republicans passing and signing liberal legislation as part of the problem. You apparently consider Republicans passing and signing liberal legislation to be part of the solution.

...Congress failed us and you put too much stock in a revolution that never figured out what really needed to be done to win.

And you ignore the President's constitutional power to veto legislation. The veto of bills like the AWB is precisely what needs "to be done to win."

I'd much rather try to fix the problems within the party of greatest opportunity than fight from the outside against a party in power that wants to crush my rights.

Oh, I'm sure that your unconditional support of RINO policies will help "fix the problems within the party." You betcha...

The winner of this election will be a reblican or a democrat. If you don't vote for a republican - your giving the democrat a free vote.

And if you automatically support everything the 'Stupid Party' offers up, you're giving the liberal a free vote. "Congratufreakinglations on your choice."

I'm sure RKBA will be much better off under a party with banning as part of it's freaking platform.

LOL! I repeat: if you want to live in a fantasy land, where a Republican signing gun control legislation is somehow better than a D@mocrat signing IDENTICAL gun control legislation, then "that is your choice, I'm just dissapointed that it could effect my rights in the long term."

;>)

366 posted on 12/30/2003 4:16:25 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("COME AND TAKE IT!" - Battle of Gonzales, Texas Revolution, 1835)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
What are you trying to say? Just curious...
;>)


Ah read it again,John :- ) How goes it?
367 posted on 12/30/2003 4:17:16 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I may be psychic. I predicted you appearance here a few hours before you arrived. The Freepmail to join GOP bots always reaches you quickly.
368 posted on 12/30/2003 4:17:16 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Since you refute every single insightful contribution that I am making to this debate, why should I have to defend the fact that BUSH is the biggest spender of all time by every measure known to economics?

How does asking for facts backing up your claim of miniscule odds concerning the life expetancy of 70 - 80 year old supreme court justices relate to Bush's spending?

I am fairly certain I just wanted to know how you defined miniscule. To some it may be 10% others, .00001%. I was just curious.

Of course I expect you to back up this "fact" about as much as you backed up your plot on "Human Resource" costs, which you then called social program spending, but won't go out on a limb to say it is social program spending. Couldn't you have at said it was mislabeled?

whole GOP establishment is out to first marginalize, and then get rid of us. And you agree with that thinking. I'm not sure if you have a turd in your pocket, but this individual part of the GOP (me) is really just out to marginalize you. Not because you make sense, but because you rail against the capitalist pig corporations stepping all over the peasants...

I think you are a lib in sheeps clothing, and a bad liar.

We are 90% of the way down the road to a socialist state with totalitarian tendencies, and I am getting flamed for merely pointing it out.And ostracized by the admin. Even on FR... What the hell is going on in this country? Are you pissed that you couldn't get a night in the Lincoln Bedroom? Now the Administration is out to get you? WHo's next, little green men?

If this is not evidence that there are those that want to silence conservatives PERMANENTLY, I do not know what is. We will be a socialist nation soon... it is only a matter of when.

I don't want to silence conservative, or liberals for that matter. I do like pointing out people who claim to be one thing while their poor stepped on peasant words point to another (hatred of the capitalist pig) leaning.

369 posted on 12/30/2003 4:18:51 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Lael
I am dense..I knew that and theBC Moran story ,too.Thanks

Nah don't be so critical of yourself, you were reponding to Lael's vile reply #333 of this thread.

370 posted on 12/30/2003 4:20:59 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
I may be psychic. I predicted you appearance here a few hours before you arrived. The Freepmail to join GOP bots always reaches you quickly

Start your own psychic line and become the next Miss Cleo, it will probably have the same rate as accuracy(nil).

BTW, you are already wrong, haven't received a freepmail today.

371 posted on 12/30/2003 4:23:15 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Take your blinders off...the war isn't just on terrorism. There is a war on our constitution and conservatism, something that many of you people fail to see or simply don't give a damn because you're so blinded by party loyalty.

I've supported the Republican Party since '68 and by support I don't mean just voting Republican. Not only have I made financial contributions I have actively campaigned for Republicans on a local, state and federal level. I might add I served as a State Representative as a Republican. Now, the Republican Party, lead by GW Bush is deserting me.

As far as me being shortsighted I think that our President is being shortsighted by abandoning conservative principles simply to get re-elected. Do you consider signing the perscription drugs benefits bill a conservative move? Are you in favor of EXPANDING federal programs? Do you support the Department of Education or the National Endowment of the Arts? Do you support CFR? Do you believe we should provide amnesty for illegal aliens? It appears our President believes in those things and if you believe in those things then your just another one of those "compassionate conservatives".
372 posted on 12/30/2003 4:24:21 PM PST by politicalwit (Compassionate Republicans=Zell Miller Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
I am not calling all conservatives fascists.

I am calling those who seem to think any President can do everything a tiny fraction of never-satisfied ideologues desire, regardless of what harm it brings to the nation as a whole, fascists.

I have been totally honest about how and why I came to FR, voted for Bush and will continue to oppose the real leftwing agenda. I am not pretending to be anyhting I am not.

You and your ilk do not control the conservative wing of the Republican Party. In fact, you do not control very much of anything at all and that is why you are so furious with GWB.

Condescend to whomever if that is the only way you can feel superior, but your faction is being rolled as we argue here by the real socialists every time you vow publicly or run a web site to convince others to vote for some loser of a 3rd party idiot who couldn't put together a voting coalition in Congress if his life depended on it.

It is precisely the compassionate and Christian nature of George Bush that has brought people like me into the Republican fold.

I cannot recall if it was you or someone agreeing w/you who railed on about Dawg being wealthy and Bush being an aristocrat and the fact that whomever it was didn't get enough of a tax cut, but that is the class envy card and the left knows how to play it to get populist hardheads to abandon any chance of incrementally gutting what they have laboriously built up as the socialist infrastructure over 60 years or more.

I have owned rural land for over 30 years. We are gun owners. We have been self-employed all our adult lives. We have come to see the total fraud of *a woman's right to choose*. We no longer support public education because it is not what it was when we were in school. We love America and want her protected.

We know we represent a large number of former leftists who loathe everything the transnational left stands for. We loathe it more than than those of you who have always been conservatives because we were personally duped and personally experienced the fascism on the left.

We will re-elect Bush and hopefully whomever runs against the left in 08.

BTW, it is a paleo tactic to call anyone who ever changed their mind a poseur.

I find your version of conservativism to be controlling, lacking in compassion and the perfect way to foment a revolution in America that will put the tranzis in power for all time. I think your sort desires a revolution, the bloodier the better. I applaud the conservatives who are puncturing your bombast. They are the sorts of individuals who drew me to the right.

You are the sort of individual who repelled me on the left.
373 posted on 12/30/2003 4:28:44 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
When we can't trust Bush to protect and believe in the Constitution how do you think we can trust him to select Judges who will?
374 posted on 12/30/2003 4:30:39 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
Are you in favor of EXPANDING federal programs? Do you support the Department of Education or the National Endowment of the Arts? Do you support CFR? Do you believe we should provide amnesty for illegal aliens? It appears our President believes in those things and if you believe in those things then your just another one of those "compassionate conservatives"

Ok let's take your pet peeves one by one. The education bill at least has standards. it means that schools have to perform. Huh maybe with an increased majority in the Senate, vouchers may have a chance. As for CFR, that was a mine laid for him by the press, like it or not the general electorate doesn't care about it. As for illegal aliens, a problem that hasn't been addressed for years, what is your solution?

375 posted on 12/30/2003 4:31:13 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
The odds are greatly in favor of activist judges staying alive another 5 years. Therefore, Bush will not appoint a single SC judge in the next 5 years.

If you want to bet on it for real, I'm open. I'll even give you even odds.
376 posted on 12/30/2003 4:31:57 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Thank you for exposing your anti-American, pro-genocide agenda for all to see.

Actually, it is Interesting to see just what venom is "projected" into one innocuous comment.

For your information and edification, I was thinking of that famous New Yorker cover artwork showing the country from a New York perspective, with the city streets of 9th, 10th, and 11th Avenues taking up 2/3 of thse cover, the rest of the country scrunched into 1/4 of the remaining space, with Japan in the far edge.

Google it, the print is available somewhere!

377 posted on 12/30/2003 4:32:05 PM PST by Lael (Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Absolutely.

Bush I was rolled and the hard right ate it up, voted for Perot and elected Clinton.

And the tranzis are still using that tactic.
378 posted on 12/30/2003 4:36:43 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
I think it is the voters who have done wonders for conservatism.

The majority of the voters in the last presidential election voted for either Gore or Nadar. I think the voters as a group have done little for conservatism.

379 posted on 12/30/2003 4:39:26 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: GunsareOK
Then you are NO Conservative,harfline or otherwise, have NO idea about just how little you know/understand politics,and have wasted your time on FR.
380 posted on 12/30/2003 4:39:41 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
you'll know the "read my lips" debacle was made into something by first liar, bill clinton

Remember the middle class tax cut, clinton was touting during the 92 campaign, and then he and a demo congress raised them.

The press never held him to it.

381 posted on 12/30/2003 4:40:38 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
The odds are greatly in favor of activist judges staying alive another 5 years. Therefore, Bush will not appoint a single SC judge in the next 5 years.

So the only issue is removing activist judges - what about maintaining the non-activist judges?

382 posted on 12/30/2003 4:42:42 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Yet another UNAPPEASEABLE , proving to one and all, just how unConservative and irrational he is, I see. And yes,Dead did a good job.
383 posted on 12/30/2003 4:42:56 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

Comment #384 Removed by Moderator

To: !1776!
Maintaining non activist judges is important.
385 posted on 12/30/2003 4:45:22 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
In memory of 911....that was a despicable thing to say.

Please see #377 for what I was thinking.

I apologise for offending you.

I have a very dear friend who worked on the 80th Floor, South Tower. She retired a few years ago, but I visited enough that I knew Fuji Bank and Trust like the back of my hand.

When the plane struck the South Tower, it was just as if a knife had been plunged into my heart!

And worse, for the first week "they" misreported where the plane struck.

Finally, two survivors from the 80th floor came forward and clarified what had happened.

My friend Needlepointed a caricature of "The Banker", and the President of Fuji Bank so liked it that it was hanging on the wall on 9-11.

386 posted on 12/30/2003 4:46:05 PM PST by Lael (Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
"I am not calling all conservatives fascists. I am calling those who seem to think any President can do everything a tiny fraction of never-satisfied ideologues desire, regardless of what harm it brings to the nation as a whole, fascists. "

How does protecting and defending the Constitution bring harm to the nation? Do you think CFR and the so called "Assault Weapon" ban is Constitutional? Perhaps you think our Constitution is "Fascist"? You're not as "reformed" a liberal as you think you are. To call you a "moderate" would be generous.

387 posted on 12/30/2003 4:48:06 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg; GunsareOK
I don't know... maybe you're just not very intelligent. Who knows? Must be something like that though.

Are you sure you’re not a Democrat?

You sure talk like a Democrat.

Anyone who disagrees with you in the smallest way, in your opinion, must be an idiot.

This is typical liberal Democrat behavior.

Also typical of Democrats is the liberal use of the term Nazi, as when you called GunsareOK “one of the national socialist populist union”.

So perhaps you should ask yourself ‘am I a Conservative?’

388 posted on 12/30/2003 4:52:25 PM PST by Pontiac (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, ignorance of your rights can be fatal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dane
" Maybe AWWL, can all give us a stock tip to make a million dollars tomorrow.
After all he/she is the all knowing clairvoyant sage of FR."

I would never admit in public that I wasn't voting for President Bush because somebody's second cousin twice removed's next door neighbor overheard someone on line at Target say that GW was granting amnesty to illegals.I'd be too embarrassed. And I am sure that Ruth Bader Ginsberg is relieved to know that she won't be required to have follow up colonoscopies,now that she has been pronounced clean forever by the anti Bush psychic squad and paranormal prognosticators.I wonder if they wear turbans like The Carnac the Magnificent or Jambi from Pee Wee's Playhouse, for the younger set.
389 posted on 12/30/2003 4:53:36 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue (Mecca Lecca High,Mecca Heiny Ho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
So the only issue is removing activist judges - what about maintaining the non-activist judges?


I know you are discussing SCOTUS but don't forget that he'll probable have some 150 or more lesser court judges to appoint during that time. There have been some 168 during the first three years appointed.
390 posted on 12/30/2003 4:55:22 PM PST by deport ( Some folks wear their halos much too tight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
You were a Dem until 1980, during their radical phase.

LOLOL! So then if you think 1980 and before is the Dem's radical phase, then logically it would follow that you think post 1980 is the Dem's nonradical stage.

Your slip is showing.

391 posted on 12/30/2003 5:09:29 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
>>'Chewed 3 legs off, and was still stuck in the trap.'<<

Now that is funny! I spent two decades as a wildlife biologist and never heard that one. Thanks for a hearty laugh.

Muleteam1

392 posted on 12/30/2003 5:10:43 PM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: seamole
If you were thinking of that cartoon, then how could someone in "flyover country" fail to notice the destruction of 90% of the world?

Please see #386

When the mind stores or evaluates a picture or a verbal expression, it also stores its opposite for reference.

When a reference is made to that picture or expression, the mind processes it by comparing it to it's opposite.

Most people don't know this, and the Sales people earn their keep by using "tag expressions" of the form ", is it not?". If they say "this is a great car..., is it not?" timed just right, what the prospect accepts it 'this is a great car'. The "NOT" shuts down the prospect's evaluation process.

If I offended you, I apologize.

New York is where I grew up, at a time that the Hayden Planetarium and it's Zeiss Machine were world famous, and where the Christmas Show really did get into how the sky looked in March of 4 BC.

393 posted on 12/30/2003 5:12:21 PM PST by Lael (Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
How does protecting and defending the Constitution bring harm to the nation? Do you think CFR and the so called "Assault Weapon" ban is Constitutional? Perhaps you think our Constitution is "Fascist"? You're not as "reformed" a liberal as you think you are.

How ignorant do you have to be to not know the constitution is what ever 5 of the 9 judges say is is ... today. Do you really think the constitution says slavery is legal? Do you really think the constitution says blacks are not human beings? Do you think the constitution says blacks are property like dogs or cows, and can never be citizens?

That is exactly what the Supreme court said in the Dred Scott Decision way back in 1857. Only a complete idiot could read the constitution and then examine the supreme court decisions of the last 200 years, and not know that the constitution and used toilet paper are the same thing... Both are worthless sh*t on paper.

What is constitutional, is what ever the Supreme court says is constitutional. They can and often do change their minds a few years later. They don't care what the words in the constitution mean. Those words mean what ever the justices want them to mean.... no more no less. What you and ohters who are not Supreme court Justices think they mean is of no consequence. That has been going on for 200 years. Read the 200 year old Marbury Vs. Madison decision. Madison wrote the constitution and the in 1804 they court ruled in that case that the author of the constitution did not know what the words in the constituion meant. They supreme court in 1804 ruled the court and not the author had the right to say what the author of the constitution meant by his words. Does that give you a clue? I didn't think so.

It does not matter if the next person put to death for murder is innocent or not. It only matters that the courts ordered that person put to death for murder. Life or death is determined by courts not the words in the law.

You read the words in the constitution and think you know what they mean. You are silly enough to think the words mean what the dictionary says the mean. Madison the author of the constitution thought he knew what he had written, but the justices said he was mistaken.

How many enforced supreme court decisions will it take until fools figure out that

it is of no importance what the words in the constitution say or mean to anyone. It only matters who gets to be the justices.


394 posted on 12/30/2003 5:15:28 PM PST by Common Tator (I support Billybob. www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
"But, I am totally disgusted at his refusal to control our borders".

So am I and I'm at a complete loss to understand why President Bush never addresses this problem. And our open borders are a very serious problem! The Democratic presidential candidates never address this issue either. What's going on?

395 posted on 12/30/2003 5:16:25 PM PST by maxwellp (Throw the U.N. in the garbage where it belongs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: deport
I know you are discussing SCOTUS but don't forget that he'll probable have some 150 or more lesser court judges to appoint during that time. There have been some 168 during the first three years appointed.

Very good point, and in fact, most of the current litigation concerning the 2nd amendment (among other things) is naturally occurring belwo the SCOTUS.

And later, those lower court judges become candidates for higher courts...

396 posted on 12/30/2003 5:21:20 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?
It is certainly no substitute for a President and a Congress that honor the Constitution...

Key word bolded. Congress shouldn't be getting a free pass since it is easier to blame one elected official. As long as people keep "hoping" there will be a President that gives them everything they want, the longer it will take to have a veto proof majority in Congress that will work within the Constitution.

You apparently consider Republicans passing and signing liberal legislation to be part of the solution.

Not at all. The libs version would be much worse.

LOL! I repeat: if you want to live in a fantasy land, where a Republican signing gun control legislation is somehow better than a D@mocrat signing IDENTICAL gun control legislation, then "that is your choice, I'm just dissapointed that it could effect my rights in the long term."

I'm not willing to cut off my nose in spite of my face.

397 posted on 12/30/2003 5:27:25 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: !1776!
It is certainly no substitute for a President and a Congress that honor the Constitution...Key word bolded. Congress shouldn't be getting a free pass since it is easier to blame one elected official.

"Key word bolded." 'The President shouldn't be getting a free pass since it is easier (for some ;>) to blame Congress.'

WIJG: You apparently consider Republicans passing and signing liberal legislation to be part of the solution.

!: Not at all. The libs version would be much worse.

Really? We'll see if Mr. Bush signs an extension of the 'assault weapons' ban. If it's as bad as (or worse than ;>) the original 1994 "libs version," what precisely would be the difference?

WIJG: I repeat: if you want to live in a fantasy land, where a Republican signing gun control legislation is somehow better than a D@mocrat signing IDENTICAL gun control legislation, then "that is your choice, I'm just dissapointed that it could effect my rights in the long term."

!: I'm not willing to cut off my nose in spite of my face.

And I am not willing to call a pig's ear a silk purse, simply because it is jammed down my throat by a Republican rather than a D@mocrat.

;>)

398 posted on 12/30/2003 5:42:18 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("COME AND TAKE IT!" - Battle of Gonzales, Texas Revolution, 1835)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan
LOL.....some of us have already tried that.....some people don't "get" it.
399 posted on 12/30/2003 5:52:24 PM PST by goodnesswins (On the SIXTH Day of CHRISTMAS........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
and call a 90 or 95 a lesser evil, well, that is just a failure of perspective.

Fair enough. We agree to disagree. Independent thinkers often do.

At least your not comparing anybody to Nazis.

400 posted on 12/30/2003 5:56:04 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 501-535 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson