Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hunter112
You have posited a false alternative: a) either use contraception; b) be a breeding machine. The third alternative: Bring sexual activity under the control of reason.

Every single Christian church taught that the use of contraception is a species of sodomy, until 1930, when the Anglicans "approved" its use. Now they are ordaining sodomite bishops and persecuting those who resist.

44 posted on 01/02/2004 2:22:13 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan
Bring sexual activity under the control of reason.

I guess that could mean letting one's marriage fall into being a sexless relationship, no thanks. How about the concept of bringing the consequences of sexual activity under control? That's all conception control is. Comparisons of contraception to sodomy are going to give sodomy a better name, something the gay marriage folks are already trying to do. I guess that's why the SCOTUS had to create privacy out of thin air, because the Connecticut legislature used religious thinking to define what a married couple could do in their own bedrooms. Now, we have that same privacy concept being expanded in ways that no one thought possible in 1967.

45 posted on 01/02/2004 2:55:43 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson