Skip to comments.
Interview with David Kay - "I don't think [stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons] existed"
IOL/Reuters ^
| 1-24-04
Posted on 01/24/2004 8:37:33 AM PST by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: goodnesswins
Respectfully, a problem I see w/your analogy is that in place of a one on one confrontation w/said murderer, we demanded that young men and women do our bidding in Iraq.
We -the average Joe or Jane looking to the Government for protection- defended and continue to defend ourselves by proxy. I'm not saying that I don't understand or think it necessary to do so, only that it carries a moral weight much heavier than the illustration you referenced.
I think that this story has the power to hurt President Bush in that it will make it very, very difficult in the future to pursue potential threats based on the same rationale.
21
posted on
01/24/2004 9:17:17 AM PST
by
AlbionGirl
("Ha cambiato occhi per la coda.")
To: aristeides
Two Iraqi scientists that were talking to Kay were assassinated by Saddam's thugs.
Why would they bother if there was no WMD?
22
posted on
01/24/2004 9:19:37 AM PST
by
Selene
To: eyespysomething
It's the intelligence, stupid. No, it was stupid intelligence.
To: Selene
Two Iraqi scientists that were talking to Kay were assassinated by Saddam's thugs. Why would they bother if there was no WMD?Link?
To: Selene
Why would they bother if there was no WMD? Haven't a lot of other Iraqis who were thought to be cooperating with the occupiers been killed?
To: pickemuphere
I think Kay told Tony Snow this in an interview.
26
posted on
01/24/2004 9:23:49 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: goodnesswins
Say there's a guy in your neighborhood who says he has a gun, and he wants to kill your family....YOU do NOT really KNOW if he has a gun, and he hasn't attempted to kill your family lately, but, he sure talks a lot about it, and he has family members saying the same thing....WHAT would YOU DO?Except the fact that the 'guy' isn't in your neighborhood, he's three cities away, he has no transportation to get to your neighborhood, and after a few minutes of observation you realize he was just talking trash to appear to be the big guy in his neighborhood.
27
posted on
01/24/2004 9:23:52 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: pickemuphere
That's what I mean. Bush should come out strong on this.
Also, he said from the beginning that a big reason was to free the people from Saddam's grip of terror. They should have played that angle more to the American people, and the UN.
Still, someone has to answer for the intelligence.
It was a just war, and will remain one.
28
posted on
01/24/2004 9:27:26 AM PST
by
eyespysomething
(Another American optimist!)
To: pickemuphere
Two Iraqi scientists that were talking to Kay were assassinated by Saddam's thugs. Why would they bother if there was no WMD?
Link?
___________
It was on PBS Frontline two nights ago. Kay seemed quite disturbed by it.
29
posted on
01/24/2004 9:27:46 AM PST
by
Selene
To: tallhappy
The left and dems will use this big time to beat the dead BushLied horse. You're right. I just had a dicussion with a co-worker about this.
Of course, he didn't lie. Here's quotes on what he said. Look at Dubya's comments. He never says Iraq has WMD. He uses phrases like "we have sources that tell us" and "our intelligence officials estimate."
I have no doubt he believed what he was saying.
Note that the site's an anti-Bush site.
30
posted on
01/24/2004 9:27:57 AM PST
by
Tribune7
(Vote Toomey April 27)
To: Allan
ping
31
posted on
01/24/2004 9:28:42 AM PST
by
keri
To: tallhappy
I was always leery of using WMD as the sole premise for going to war.
I knew that we had bombed the heck out of them for 10 years, and that most chem and bio weapons have a 'shelf-life' of only a few years, there wasn't going to be "tons and tons" of these weapons as Cheney kept saying.
They should have at least 2 points, one being humanitarian, many on the left would have gone along, and could not then accuse Bush of lying.
32
posted on
01/24/2004 9:32:29 AM PST
by
CMClay
To: Tribune7
Bookmarking
33
posted on
01/24/2004 9:34:12 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: CMClay
Bush will be accused of lying no matter what he says. Bill Clinton was never accused of this after his statement in 1998.
34
posted on
01/24/2004 9:38:23 AM PST
by
UB355
To: billbears
OKay...so change the story....THE "guy" has NUCLEAR capabilities, or is trying to get them to blow YOUR neighborhood to smithereens....by proxy.
35
posted on
01/24/2004 9:41:04 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Poverty is more about the "mental" than the "money.")
To: goodnesswins
Except the fact that we had already ransacked the guy's house, his own family in 1995 comes out and admits he has no gun and hasn't for many years, and the 'nuclear' story has questionable beginnings at best. Not the best reasons to go burn the guy's house down I'd say
36
posted on
01/24/2004 9:48:48 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: All
We saw it live on TV: Missiles which would go beyond the specified limits. The Iraqis protested that they would not go that far. But we found that to be a bare-faced lie.
Fool me once, shape on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
The words "I think" means Kay doesn't know not that they don't exist.
Blix's words were: "Unless they take them to us, we will never find them".
37
posted on
01/24/2004 9:48:52 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: steve50
"...but I think he's gone either before or shortly after the election anyway."
Cheney's off the ticket?
38
posted on
01/24/2004 9:52:10 AM PST
by
7.62 x 51mm
(Dogs have masters; Cats have staff...)
To: billbears
Not the best reasons to go burn the guy's house down I'd say Why do you think Iraq belonged to Saddam Hussein?
39
posted on
01/24/2004 9:56:03 AM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: billbears
Oh, I forgot....he's been raping and pillaging the rest of his neighbors, and they've been TRYING to deal with him, but it hasn't worked.....which is why WE ransacked his house in the first place.....but, hey, who care, let 'em be....it's NOT OUR PROBLEM....yet
40
posted on
01/24/2004 10:02:37 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Poverty is more about the "mental" than the "money.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson