Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Poll: Kerry surges to the head of the pack, beating even Bush. ( Lib RAG Alert)
newsweek via msnbc.msn.com ^ | 01/24/04 | Brian Braiker

Posted on 01/24/2004 1:55:23 PM PST by KQQL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: ambrose
It depends .....economy and situation in Iraq
21 posted on 01/24/2004 2:10:26 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
but they are able to use these polls to sway undecideds to Kerry, that is their purpose.
22 posted on 01/24/2004 2:11:46 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Well, one thing is certain: Next year we will either have a Republican or a Democrat in the presidency.
23 posted on 01/24/2004 2:12:15 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Of course it depends on those things. It doesn't depend on a Newsweak poll in weak after which Kerry has received nothing but glowing and positive coverage and while W. still hasn't turned on the campaign machinery.
24 posted on 01/24/2004 2:12:54 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
This would be laughable except it seems some of you believe it. Conservatives once again will shoot themselves in the foot and then scream for 4 years if a democrat is elected. Even democrats don't get everything they want when they elect a President. So, go ahead and let a democrat be elected and then please be quiet for the following 4 years. IMO, I am about fed up listening to the whining of so called conservatives. Be happy for once in your life (if that is possible)that we have a wonderful President who we should respect. Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!!!
25 posted on 01/24/2004 2:13:07 PM PST by calchey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
You are right, he will only compete with W in following Red states NH, NV, AZ, OH , FL, WV and AR
26 posted on 01/24/2004 2:13:37 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
The true purpose of this poll is to sway the Rats in N. Hampshire.

Pure manipulation. Media has done nothing but bash Dean for weeks, nothing but kissy poo coverage of Kerry, and now this poll. Bet the stupid Rat lemmings won't pick up on the fact they're being buffaloed into supporting the establishment anointed candidate over the outsider, Howard Dean.
27 posted on 01/24/2004 2:15:05 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Kerry's wife, Teresa Heinz, still has strong local ties in PA. She could actually deliver PA for Kerry, along with a few neighboring Great Lakes states. I think the 2004 election outcome will be determined in the Midwest.
28 posted on 01/24/2004 2:17:11 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
You are right, OH and MO could decide the race.
29 posted on 01/24/2004 2:19:48 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
So, you'd rather see the Democrats back in power, right?

Great question. Why don't you pose it to someone who can really influence the outcome: George W. Bush himself?

Shriekers like you always seem to assume that the individual voter is the only dynamic factor in a presidential election. In your world Bush is a helpless static factor, imprisoned by circumstances beyond his control. It is thus up to the individual voter to rescue him from his prison.

In truth, Bush can vitally affect the outcome of the election depending on the strategy he adopts. On the advice of people such as Karl Rove, Bush has calculated the odds and determined that he must suck up to seniors and illegal aliens to win. That is the "winning" strategy he has adopted, and he has adopted it in the full expectation that he will lose the "unappeasable" conservative voters such as myself.

Has Bush miscalculated? If you believe he has, whine to him about it. If you believe he is right on the money, why are you complaining at all?

30 posted on 01/24/2004 2:21:03 PM PST by Kevin Curry (Dems' magnificent four: Shrieking Nikita, Frenchie La Lurch , Gen. Jack D. Ripper, and Lionel Putz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Well, one thing is certain: Next year we will either have a Republican or a Democrat in the presidency.

Your statement Tailored pragmatically reads we WILL have a Republican in the Presidency.

31 posted on 01/24/2004 2:23:30 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: EGPWS
No...I don't assume that. Remember, this is the electorate that sent Bill Clinton to the Whitehouse....twice.
33 posted on 01/24/2004 2:26:50 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Kevin Curry
That is the "winning" strategy he has adopted, and he has adopted it in the full expectation that he will lose the "unappeasable" conservative voters such as myself.

And still will win reelection in a landslide.

Sadly enough, in politics making everyone happy is an impossibility, and Carl knows this to his credit.

35 posted on 01/24/2004 2:29:57 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
We have a 2 party system that ensures that no American with strong ideological views is truly satisfied. The fact remains, however, that there is will be a vast difference between Bush and whoever the Democrats nominate. And that difference makes voting worthwhile. You can bet that those on the far Left will be voting Democrat, even if they run a centrist campaign in the general election.
36 posted on 01/24/2004 2:30:30 PM PST by rockinonritalin (nilatirnonikcor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
No it won't. Kerry is a lightweight.
37 posted on 01/24/2004 2:31:52 PM PST by Pubbie (Hillary is not running in 2004 - GET OVER IT People!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
This is not good. W is starting to fade even earlier than his Poppy did. If any of you bigwig Republican movers and shakers out there are reading this, now's the time to jettison the wishy-washy bullcrap and go on the attack, before we see history repeat itself.
38 posted on 01/24/2004 2:32:44 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Newsweak polls are heavily slanted in favor of Democrats.
39 posted on 01/24/2004 2:32:46 PM PST by Pubbie (Hillary is not running in 2004 - GET OVER IT People!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rockinonritalin
Oh there you go...making sense again....
40 posted on 01/24/2004 2:32:51 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson