Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC's "Imus In The Morning," 2/3/04 (Excerpt from RNC Research w/Sen McCain interview) MUST READ
Republican National Committee ^ | Feb 3, 2004 | RNC Research

Posted on 02/03/2004 8:40:05 AM PST by PhiKapMom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 last
To: Alberta's Child
" I don't feel the same sense of betrayal, for the same reason that Bernie McGuirk doesn't -- we never bought into the WMD crap in the first place."

I never felt betrayed. If you listen to all of President Bush's speeches before the war as well as to Wolfowitz speeches, WMD program activities were mentioned, the torture and rape and murder of Iraqi people were mentioned, the AlQuaeda fellow living in Baghdad was also mentioned and Salman Pak was mentioned and "not wait for an imminent threat" was mentioned. Everyone knows that Saddam had WMD--ask the dead Kurds and Iranians about the WMD if you want to see their dead faces. The inernational community said he had WMD, the democrats said he had WMD, UN said he had them. So either everyone was wrong and the WMD were all used up on the Kurds or they are still hidden--either in Iraq or Syria or maybe even US.
181 posted on 02/03/2004 2:59:06 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
McCain was campaigning for Bush in New Hampshire when the democrats wer having the primary. McCain spoke very nice things about Bush. McCain always speaks measured--never wanting to say something if not 100%. He said he did not look into Bush record so his answers just merely cover him--but I think it a joke--Michael Moore, Chris Mathews, Imus and McAuliffe (all chickens in my book are questioning about Bush service) What did Imus do and about Chrissy--how old is he?
182 posted on 02/03/2004 3:08:18 PM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Huck; PhiKapMom
Imus is part of the Cheney-Rumsfeld are evil crowd That's today but tomorrow he will change with the wind. He announced he and his wife are republicans and he voted for Bush yet now says he's pulling for "his man" Kerry. Go figure.

I heard part of the interview and was shocked that McCain acted honorably in defending GWB.

183 posted on 02/03/2004 3:15:27 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
The only evidence that he didn't show up in Alabama, is that his records were never transferred back to his home unit when he returned. People remember seeing him there (aside from the unit commander, who has no idea), but no contemporary statements that he wasn't there. Also, at the time of the assignemt, he was a pilot for a plane that had been decommissioned.

Military units care where their own people are. They only care where other units people are when there is a problem, and are seldom concientious about forwarding records when people they are only tangentially responsible for leave. I know that multiple times I had to go back and get records for training that were supposed to have been forwarded - and that was during a time when admin was generally actually functional, rather than during the draw-down of Vietnam.

184 posted on 02/03/2004 3:37:01 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
McCain actually sounded disgusted to me. Not fake politician disgust. He sounded like he thought Imus was over the line.
185 posted on 02/03/2004 4:29:31 PM PST by Huck (I was gonna write an opus, but we'll just have to wait and see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You are absolutely right. The plan was to run as many candidates as they could, each one setting out to bash President Bush around the clock in every venue imaginable. That's why hardly anyone has dropped out. They've been INSTRUCTED to stay in for the exclusive purpose of scorched earth against an honorable man.
186 posted on 02/03/2004 5:05:54 PM PST by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org freeper site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
.... light bulb came on last night that this whole RAT primary has been a farce with the sole intent to destroy Pres Bush's numbers and his credibility ...

Mentioned this to you some time back. It was obvious from the get-go, having as many Demlibrat candidates as possible, hitting on PresBush day after day, week after week was the plan. The Clintonistas are responsible. Specifically, Bill Clinton's fingerprints are all over this strategy. Der schlickmeister knew Bush wouldn't respond in the early stages of the nomination process.

When the Bush campaign does decide to respond, I don't think the nominee is gonna like it. Did you hear that John "The Schmuck" Kerry?!

187 posted on 02/03/2004 8:48:30 PM PST by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I woke up in the middle of the night with the thought the clintons were behind this and then I could not remember who else had told me that sometime back. I am glad you wrote that because I was beginning to think I had dreamed that too.
188 posted on 02/03/2004 8:54:45 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Is this the story to which you're referring, PKM?  It hasn't gotten much attention here either.  The dems scream AWOL louder than we toss back the Johnny Chung info on which  the Boston Globe did a story on February 1.  When did Terry MacAuliffe begin yelling AWOL.....again?  Sunday, February 1.  And, the Newsweek magazine was due out Monday.  Sheer misdirection of the media......and it worked.

John F. Kerry - Johnny Chung Links:

KERRY'S FUND-RAISER ACCOUNT DOESN'T ADD UP (Kerry and Clinton buddy---Johnny Chung)

NEWSWEEK: Cash and Kerry

 

189 posted on 02/04/2004 7:16:55 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Don't forget Cleland is on of those "angry white men". You know the ones, liberal democrats from the south. Must be getting lonely! I am sure he'd call Mother Theresa names is she was a conservative.
190 posted on 02/04/2004 7:27:48 AM PST by jstolarczyk (jstolarczyk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If you go back you will find WMDs were not the reason for war, it was one reason. We went to war because Saddam refused to comply with UN mandates, one of which was the basis for the 1991 cease fire. The UN report in Feb 2003, mentions a huge unaccounted for stockpile of VX gas, that IAW the UN mandates, Saddam had to account for. He didn't, he lost. Besides, unless 300,000+ known murder victims is chump change, I say we found the weapon of mass destruction in a spider hole with a beard. He may have been more a threat to humanity than to America, but who knew (possible the French, but since they were bought off they could not notify the rest of us). So nobody should feel used!
191 posted on 02/04/2004 1:27:33 PM PST by jstolarczyk (jstolarczyk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-191 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson