Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore's the crime of 'Passion' (More hate and hysteria from the left)
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/moviereviews/story/167446p-146309c.html ^ | 2/24/04 | Jami Bernard

Posted on 02/25/2004 1:07:08 PM PST by jimbo123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: jimbo123
I can't help but feel that anyone who calls this movie anti-jewish is broadcasting their own anti-christian sentiment.

Secondly, when the smoke finally clears, this movie may well be heralded as the most important movie of our generation.
41 posted on 02/25/2004 1:57:53 PM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
This post starts with the word "Gore," and I thought I would be reading the latest about Prince Albert.

LOL.
42 posted on 02/25/2004 1:59:46 PM PST by Chris Talk (What Earth now is, Mars once was. What Mars now is, Earth will become.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Did some googling

http://www.carm.org/misc/crucifixion.htm

http://www.holytrinity.ok.goarch.org/Interesting%20Stuff/Special%20Communication%20Plus%20Picture.html

http://www.frugalsites.net/jesus/scourging.htm

http://www.intermirifica.org/lent/passion4.htm

Scourging of Jesus

At the Praetorium, Jesus was severely whipped. (Although the severity of the scourging is not discussed in the four gospel accounts, it is implied in one of the epistles (1 Peter 2:24). A detailed word study of the ancient Greek text for this verse indicates that the scourging of Jesus was particularly harsh. (33) ) It is not known whether the number of lashes was limited to 39, in accordance with Jewish law. (5) The Roman soldiers, amused that this weakened man had claimed to be a king, began to mock him by placing a robe on his shoulders, a crown of thorns on his head, and a wooden staff as a scepter in his right hand.

(1) Next, they spat on Jesus and struck him on the head with the wooden staff. (1) Moreover, when the soldiers tore the robe from Jesus' back, they probably reopened the scourging wounds. (7)

The severe scourging, with its intense pain and appreciable blood loss, most probably left Jesus in a preshock state. Moreover, hematidrosis had rendered his skin particularly tender. The physical and mental abuse meted out by the Jews and the Romans, as well as the lack of food, water, and sleep, also contributed to his generally weakened state. Therefore, even before the actual crucifixion, Jesus' physical condition was at least serious and possibly critical.

43 posted on 02/25/2004 2:00:17 PM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
One answer to the claims of anti-Sematism can be found in an Easter prayer:

Prayer to the Crucified Christ

Lord Jesus hanging on the Cross, I raise sorrowful and shameful eyes to You. You have granted me untold blessings and I have repaid You by contributing to Your Passion and death. My hands took part in Your scourging, my voice was among those who denied You and called for Your death, my thoughts brought about Your crowning with thorns, my sins drove nails into your hands and feet, and the lance into Your side.

Dear Lord, forgive me for all these sins. You are great, glorious, and infinitely good; I am insignificant, selfish, and hopelessly sinful. But I am sorry for my sins, and by the Blood shed in Your Passion I beg for forgiveness and for a share in Your love and grace.

Amen

This was found at: http://www.immaculateheart.com/Ave%20Maria/prayers_to_the_Son.htm

44 posted on 02/25/2004 2:00:43 PM PST by JimSEA ( "More Bush, Less Taxes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Is it historically accurate?

I seem to recall a bunch of people in the media saying a big "Who cares?", concerning the historical accuracy of the miniseries about the Reagans.

45 posted on 02/25/2004 2:16:19 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Anyone who'd print such absurd hyperbole would not be allowed to work for any responsible news organization.

She doesn't work for a responsible news organization...she works for Mort Zuckerman's.
46 posted on 02/25/2004 2:55:25 PM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I seem to recall a bunch of people in the media saying a big "Who cares?", concerning the historical accuracy of the miniseries about the Reagans.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1071479/posts

47 posted on 02/25/2004 2:59:58 PM PST by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
And your point is?It's not Wtar Wars. It will have a limited audience.One of the complaints I have with Gibson movies is that they are very violent and bloody.It will pass if the screamers will let it.
48 posted on 02/25/2004 3:19:52 PM PST by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson