Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio search for ET draws a blank
BBC News Online ^ | Thursday, March 25, 2004 | By Dr David Whitehouse

Posted on 03/28/2004 8:38:01 AM PST by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Momaw Nadon
The scientists looked at 800 nearby stars with no evidence of a signal from ET.

800 out of uncountable *billions* of star systems.

41 posted on 03/28/2004 1:37:29 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Ewwwwww. Why mess up a thread with that photo. :-(
42 posted on 03/28/2004 2:43:28 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
So...would we be looking for a doppler shift from a planetary-orbit in a narrow band?

Exactly. In fact, by the use of FFTs, many narrowband frequencies are scanned simultaneously. They are also checked for a doppler shift due to planetary motion.

43 posted on 03/28/2004 2:48:39 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; edwin hubble
Hmmm...I still think that any life that probably exists "out there" is about as technologically advanced as we are. However, it certainly doesn't hurt to look, particularly since Gen III stars may have formed earlier in other parts of the Universe.
44 posted on 03/28/2004 2:51:42 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
They are also checked for a doppler shift due to planetary motion.

To escape detection, an advanced species would send out Doppler-shift-proof signals. (But I can't imagine how they'd manage that trick.) Well, maybe they'd only send out very brief signals at the same time each day. You'd never see a difference.

45 posted on 03/28/2004 2:53:50 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
How sad! This person obviously hates him/herself and is in serious need of spiritual and psychological help.
46 posted on 03/28/2004 2:54:44 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
SETI at home has been running on my computers for a couple years.
I still haven't received a payment from the "tax-paying suckers."
I thought I was doing it as my contribution to research.
47 posted on 03/28/2004 3:01:11 PM PST by ASA Vet ("Anyone who signed up after 11/28/97 is a newbie")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
They're heeeeeeere.

Indeed.


48 posted on 03/28/2004 3:04:28 PM PST by null and void (Don't stand idly by and watch your country commit Hairy Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Who says the ET's have to use radio to communicate? They might have something that makes radio look like smoke signals. Sub-space frequencies open, captain!
49 posted on 03/28/2004 3:08:29 PM PST by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
I thought I was doing it as my contribution to research.

Indeed you are. :-)

50 posted on 03/28/2004 3:15:33 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Well, maybe they'd only send out very brief signals at the same time each day. You'd never see a difference.

Except our planet is rotating as well. :-)

51 posted on 03/28/2004 3:16:32 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Assuming you can get money from tax-paying suckers and from folks so rich they've run out of other projects to fund (e.g., Paul Allen of Microsoft $$$ just gave some more funds to the ET search.)

Not only is SETI privately funded and far bigger than the crappy little federal program it replaced, but it is producing so much radiotelescope data that a whole new computational form, grid computing, had to be developed to reduce the data. This technique, setting millions of scattered PC's to work on small chunks of the data set, is now being applied to similar problems like protein folding. If you don't like lending the spare cycles on your PC to SETI, you can apply it to cancer research.

52 posted on 03/28/2004 3:19:11 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Have any of our space probes been turned to face earth to see what kind of radio signal we put out?
53 posted on 03/28/2004 3:23:08 PM PST by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Quix
Is Earth in your UWAG? < /humor >

I believe there are much more civilizations than you estimate. It is entirely possible that advanced civilizations may be beyond radio as a means of communication, or use a different method altogether .

I saw a TV science show a few years ago theorizing that someday soon (a few hundred years?), we will be a silent planet, no broadcasting of any kind, all communication similar to cable or fiber optics.

This may be off topic, but for the past several decades sightings of aerial phenomena have been reported, have any communications ever been reported?
(Looks like a ping is needed for Quix's comments.)

54 posted on 03/28/2004 3:47:03 PM PST by Las Vegas Dave (Vote GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Maybe God made man to populate the universe... pretty cool, all those resources.CS Lewis had a take on that...
55 posted on 03/28/2004 3:55:57 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS! Nor the overlords ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I'm going to keep plenty of rolls of foil around to make those double-strength hats. They are coming, it's only a matter of time.

You HAVE GOT to be kidding. Wherethhell have you been? THEY ARE HEE ALREADY, DOOFUS

56 posted on 03/28/2004 4:23:15 PM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Except our planet is rotating as well.

Well, that would affect any signal you get, artificial or otherwise.

57 posted on 03/28/2004 4:26:58 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Just my two cents.

YOU'RE too modest, RA.
Your comment is worth at least $0.05.

58 posted on 03/28/2004 4:32:14 PM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
This person obviously hates him/herself and is in serious need of spiritual and psychological help.

I'd say bathing ought to be the first priority.....

;-)

59 posted on 03/28/2004 6:30:29 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Well, that would affect any signal you get, artificial or otherwise.

Unless our antennae were located at the poles, or the target star system lies on a line parallel to our polar axis

;-)

60 posted on 03/28/2004 6:36:11 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson