Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Housewife Who Stoned Sons Found Not Guilty ^ | 4/3/04 |

Posted on 04/03/2004 6:00:46 PM PST by zook

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: Lunatic Fringe
(Just picking your post among others - nothing personal... Good people can and will disagree about these things.)

"Texas juries have twice ruled that women can kill their children and get off with this lame insanity defense."

Re: "Got off"... Andrea Yates got life in prison, and from all accounts, ever since she was treated enough to come out of her delusional state, has repeatedly tried to kill herself.

" If a father claimed God told him to kill his kids, and he crushed their skulls with large rocks, people would be screaming to bring back the electric chair to charbroil his ass."

Even if it were true that an insane male could not get an appropriate verdict, it wouldn't make giving an inappropriate one to a female to make the injustice "even".

"The prevailing attitude that a mother just wouldn't do something like this unless she were crazy is the sad reality of 21st century America."

Then how come so many women (including Andrea Yates, who IMHO was "crazy") fail to get verdicts of legally insane? Prisons are full of women who would have if they could.

" And what disgusts more than the verdict is that the laws dictate she be committed until she is "well." Now, she won't be out in 6 months but probably within 6 years"

That may be "getting off" more lightly than the death penalty, but it is certainly not "getting off" to the extent some seem to consider impunity... (BTW, I think there should be a minimum time spent committed - like 10 years - before one could be released - and then under supervision.)

FWIW, No one is more sickened by her act than I. I have children of my own and the thought... ugh - no words.
My gut reaction is to torture her to death.

But I do believe it is possible for someone to be so delusional thatt in their minds they believe they are doing the work of God - following a righteous path higher than mere human laws. While I think it is extremely rare, I tend to believe this is one of those cases. Not only are we Texans less likely than most to accept excuses, but it seems even her prosecutors couldn't find paid witnesses to support them.
81 posted on 04/03/2004 8:34:11 PM PST by Trinity_Tx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Kinda novel to have us Texans accused of being soft on crime, isn't it? <G>
82 posted on 04/03/2004 8:37:29 PM PST by Trinity_Tx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Trinity_Tx
Yes it is.
83 posted on 04/03/2004 8:41:42 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
It looks like a smirk to me.

84 posted on 04/03/2004 9:06:19 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
We don't have that option here in NC; but that's what it should be -- or something close to that; I don't know the correct words, but however it's denoted, it should mean, you ain't going to prison, but since we know you did it, go straight to an institution.

BTW, I'll go ever further: I'm in favor of a law that says once they are "cured" they go to prison.

That sounds about right to me. I believe that some states actually do approximate that set up, with "guilty by means of mental defect," or whatever the wording is. One way or another, you're kept under lock and key ... forever.

85 posted on 04/03/2004 9:06:48 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: zook
The big problem we have is focusing on the concept of punishing very dangerous people, when in fact we ought to focus on protecting society.

We don't cage rabid dogs together and let them tear at each other in their crazed misery. We don't punish crazy animals. We don't try to rehabilitate dangerous animals. We destroy them.

I will never understand why we cage people so sick and so lost that there is nothing we can do to make them safe to have around. We don't have the power to fix people like this. Medicines are so uncertain with severe psychosis, and noncompliance with treatment is the biggest problem with insanity.

There is a kinder and wiser judge who has the power to dispense perfect justice. Atheists may have something to fear from a kindly applied capital punishment...crazy people who can't tell right from wrong really don't.

We'll all face death eventually. Why not make the date certain for people who are too sick to fix?

I'm really sorry for this woman...if she was responsible for her actions in any way at all her punishment will be greater than I can imagine, and if she was not, heaven help her if she ever does recover her sanity enough to know what she did. For surely she'd lose it again right afterward.
86 posted on 04/03/2004 9:43:26 PM PST by Triple Word Score (Meretriciousness Everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Not only did she know what she was doing, she planned it....otherwise why did she put the rock under the baby's crib before she went to bed and why did she try to lock her sleeping husband in the bedroom, before she carries out that plan....
If her husband had been the one to do this, he would have been found guilty and given the death penalty.

87 posted on 04/03/2004 9:47:42 PM PST by kristenwood75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Juries are mostly illiterate these days because that is how the attorney's want them to be.

You know if you went around asking Ivy Leauge graduates you'd probably have trouble finding many that think that these sorts of verdicts are always inappropriate.

And I'm not convinced that modern juries are any more likely that juries of the past to hand down such a verdict. There was a relatively famous case back in the 50's were a woman drowned her kids and was found not guilty by reason of insanity. So it certainly happened.

88 posted on 04/03/2004 9:48:17 PM PST by MattAMiller (Kerry: Recommended by 9 out of 10 shadowy foreign powers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: don-o
crazy people don't do rational? Then why the 911 call, clearly rational.
89 posted on 04/03/2004 9:54:32 PM PST by kristenwood75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kristenwood75
Why is calling 911 "rational"? It seems to me that killing your kids and then calling 911 to Proclaim their death to the world is highly irrational. If she were planning on killing them, it would have made more sense to try and hide the bodies and the act itself.
90 posted on 04/03/2004 10:31:09 PM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: zook
Where were the husbands while this Laney & Yates serial killing was going on? Didn't they see the warning signs, like at a railroad crossing??! I would have my boys away from this woman (if I had any).

So suppose some black guy or cracker goes to prison for 90 years because of the three strikes laws (he likes to rob things; doesn't hurt anybody). He kills someone in prison who messed with him, and then gets the needle or chair or firing squad within months.

This is all too weird.

91 posted on 04/04/2004 4:26:06 AM PDT by My Dog Likes Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Posted on FR last night also ...

Mother acquitted in sons' stoning deaths

Hard to believe. After the jury was out for four hours and still no verdict,
I was thinking they might come back with this verdict ...

92 posted on 04/04/2004 5:38:42 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kristenwood75
I favor the "mad dog" option; i.e. I don't give a tinker's damn that some doctor says the killer is crazy. Just humanely put to death all murderers and set free all who acted in self-defense.
93 posted on 04/04/2004 6:03:31 AM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Trinity_Tx
Good post. I'm getting rather tired listening to people saying they'd like to see Andrea Yates fry.

There is a huge difference between Andrea Yates and Susan Smith. Andrea Yates had been shopped around to several psychiatrists, by her husband. Why on earth he left her with their children, when she could barely comb her hair or dress herself, is beyond me. What a horrible case.

Susan Smith was having an affair with a man who told her he didn't want to deal with her kids, so she killed them. Then she told the cops that a black man carjacked her, and kidnapped the boys. There was even a police sketch of the alleged suspect. Can you imagine if she had gotten away with it, and an innocent man had gone down for her crime?

As for this case, I don't know. Could this woman have just "snapped" one day and started hearing God? God isn't the only one who talks to people. Satan has been known to do that too.
94 posted on 04/04/2004 6:05:59 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Torrance of the flying monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterInTexas
Good post. I only had post partum depression for one day but called someone. No one has said whether she was bipolar. I'm close to someone who's thought processes are diminished. It's hard to know what he'll do since he does a lot of little things which are not rational. I'm thinking that there must have been signs of her insanity so I'm wondering where her husband and family were. I'm pro-home schooling but now with someone who is crazy. I find it hard to believe that this craziness hit all at once like a ton of bricks. Where's the rest of the story?
95 posted on 04/04/2004 6:09:32 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
So much for Texas justice... a father would never get away with this lame defense.

That's what I was thinking --- if it were reversed --- a father who had previously had committed adultery against his wife, waited until the wife was very sound asleep and then went through the house brutally killing the children after premeditation would be viewed differently.

96 posted on 04/04/2004 7:55:46 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
This gives homeschooling a bad name.
I just told my hubby that if I begin to act looney, please commit me. If the pressure is too much in homeschooling (and there is pressure!) Send them to school for a short amount of time.
All of you who want this woman put to death are letting her off easy. I want her to live for MANY, MANY years haunted by the sight of her sons being smashed by their loving mother. I want her to dream it, I want her to relive it. Let her suffer, she needs to.
97 posted on 04/04/2004 9:36:34 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Busybody of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: deport
I think the difference between this case and the Andrea Pia Yates case, where the jury found her sane, is very small. Both killed their kids because they thought God wanted them to do so.

Both called 911 to report themselves, which does show that they KNEW what they had done was wrong.

That's all it takes to defeat the insanity defense in Texas. Knowing right from wrong, whether or not they were able to control their own actions. Most states have a much more lenient standard of what insanity is than Texas does.

The jury screwed up here.

But the difference between the two cases is that here the murder was brutal. In the Yates case, drowning is not bloody.

My criminal law professor informed me during the first two weeks of class that the best way to get away with murder is to make the bloodiest, most grotesque, murder scene possible. Odds are the jury is going to think, "only a crazy person would do something like that."

My professor was right.

98 posted on 04/04/2004 9:52:16 AM PDT by Dog Gone (End Freepathons. Join the Dollar a Day Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Let's hope (all we can do these days) that when we hear "the Koran made me do it" juries are not as "compassionate".

This is sickening...where is the justice for these murdered children and for the little one who is maimed? They bought the shrinks' (secular priests)arguments...

99 posted on 04/04/2004 10:10:26 AM PDT by eleni121 (Preempt and Prevent---then Destroy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Facts are, women do and can kill children in vicious ways.

True. The CDC stats indicate that children, 5-years old and under (infanticide) were more likely to be killed by their parents than by anyone else. Murder by the father, less than half, murder by the mother, more than half. Siblings and mom's boyfriend make up the rest.

100 posted on 04/04/2004 11:56:46 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson