Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney to Promote American-Made Nuclear Reactors to China
Associated Press ^ | Apr. 9, 2004 | H. Josef Hebert

Posted on 04/09/2004 3:43:43 PM PDT by oceanagirl

WASHINGTON (AP) - On a trip to China next week to talk about high-stakes issues like terrorism and North Korea, Vice President Dick Cheney will have another task - making a pitch for Westinghouse's U.S. nuclear power technology.

At stake could be billions of dollars in business in coming years and thousands of American jobs. The initial installment of four reactors, costing $1.5 billion apiece, would also help narrow the huge U.S. trade deficit with China.

* * *

"This pitch could not be more poorly times," Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, told a hearing of the House International Relations Committee recently.

Citing recent Chinese plans to help Pakistan build two large reactors that are capable of producing plutonium, he said it is not the time for China to be rewarded with new reactor technology. U.S. officials said the Chinese have given adequate assurances that such sales will not pose a proliferation risk.

* * *

"The opportunity is not just in selling the Chinese a number of reactors, but engaging them for a longer term in a strategic partnership," says Ron Simard, who deals with future plant development at the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry trade group. That could mean future construction contracts as well as plant service business.

(Excerpt) Read more at ap.tbo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; china
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
1 posted on 04/09/2004 3:43:43 PM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
This is very stupid idea. Nuclear technology to China?
2 posted on 04/09/2004 3:45:20 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
4 Virginia 1,871.00
43
43.51
637
2.94
474.50
24

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 04/09/2004 3:45:42 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Well, I'm not very comfortable with this, if true. Surely, there must be some explantion.
4 posted on 04/09/2004 3:46:58 PM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
"This pitch could not be more poorly times," Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, told a hearing of the House International Relations Committee recently.

No time is good for these people.

Actually, this would be a good idea. It will help preserve the skills needed for nuclear plant construction in this country.

5 posted on 04/09/2004 3:49:11 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Actually, this would be a good idea. It will help preserve the skills needed for nuclear plant construction in this country.

Kim Jong Il and Ayatollah Khamanei also would like Westinghouse reactor. If they pay US dollars, they can employ many Americans too and preserve your skills. Brilliance!

6 posted on 04/09/2004 3:51:49 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Nuclear technology to China?

It's probably too little, too late, but the peak easy oil problem cound be reduced somewhat this way.

7 posted on 04/09/2004 3:51:59 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Yes, I understand the jobs issue. However, I suspect that it won't be too long before the Chinese reverse engineer one of these and then sell a cheap copy to some unsavory dictator in an oil province or the like. There would go the jobs and there would be the proliferation.
8 posted on 04/09/2004 3:53:55 PM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: oceanagirl
Citing recent Chinese plans to help Pakistan build two large reactors that are capable of producing plutonium, he said it is not the time for China to be rewarded with new reactor technology.

Until the Communist Party falls, it will NEVER be time.

10 posted on 04/09/2004 3:57:17 PM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
the Chinese have more nuke weapons than they'll ever need - they DONT have nuke powere generation technolgy. So I say great - here is an American product that does 2 big things:

1 - profits for Americans

2 - the more nuke electrical plants in China the less oil they will use. This softend their booming economy from eating all the oil making it more expensive. Our economy is assisted greatly from cheaper oil.

So get as many nuke Elec plants in China as possible.

11 posted on 04/09/2004 3:57:31 PM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It's probably too little, too late, but the peak easy oil problem could be reduced somewhat this way.

Yes, I'm concerned about peak oil as well, but this makes me a little queasy.
12 posted on 04/09/2004 3:58:38 PM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
China happens to be very advanced in nuclear tech. If they would buy some of our power plant product it is only because it would be better somehow, perhaps cheaper, believe it or not, not because they couldn't do it themselves.
13 posted on 04/09/2004 4:01:30 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
Well, I'm not very comfortable with this, if true. Surely, there must be some explantion.

Ummm.... how do you spell "NUTS" !!! ???

.

14 posted on 04/09/2004 4:06:39 PM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glorgau; corkoman; All
Actually, this would be a good idea. It will help preserve the skills needed for nuclear plant construction in this country.

Would you be saying that if it was Clinton's VP who went to China with this sale plan? Just wondering.

15 posted on 04/09/2004 4:06:46 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Right whale, from what I've read about China's reputation for protecting intellectual property and its propensity for reverse engineering (ask GM about this, in particular), I believe that at least one of these plants will not see much actual operation, but instead will be ripped apart and copied. I don't think that we can count on selling more than a handful of them, and if their copies are good and cheap, we won't be selling as many of the original Westinghouses to any country that is not willing to enforce U.S. patents, copyrights, etc.
16 posted on 04/09/2004 4:07:47 PM PDT by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
This is very stupid idea. Nuclear technology to China?

Sorry to tell you, but that horse left the barn years ago.

Google search: China "nuclear reactor"

17 posted on 04/09/2004 4:09:16 PM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
Hey, Dick. You're no Goldwater.


18 posted on 04/09/2004 4:12:42 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
Well, they need more efficient nuclear technology to match the ballistic missile technology we gave them a few years ago. Heh... the upside is that it should work to quell dissent over the need for ABM technology while providing jobs in the defense sector.
19 posted on 04/09/2004 4:15:31 PM PDT by kenth (Polls show Dennis Kucinich with 1% of the vote. With a 3% margin of error, he may owe us votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanagirl
Probably what we have in these plants are some specialty materials, some special steel alloys, and some control systems that could be copied, no doubt, but at great expense and reduced reliability. Even the fuel itself might be a custom mix and in a form that could be copied if their uranium plants had the specialized machinery. They could do this now. That they would buy nuclear plants means that we are winning in the marketplace. Our tech lead isn't so great anymore, and in many areas it is long gone. From now on we're going to have to work hard to stay competitive.
20 posted on 04/09/2004 4:17:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson