Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Political Compass (Take The Survey, See Where You Are on The Political Axis!)
PoliticalCompass.org ^

Posted on 04/17/2004 12:26:25 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

Welcome to The Political Compass.

There's abundant evidence for the need of it. The old one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left' , established for the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly of 1789, are overly simplistic for today's complex political landscape. For example, who are the 'conservatives' in today's Russia? Are they the unreconstructed Stalinists, or the reformers who have adopted the right-wing views of conservatives like Margaret Thatcher ?

On the standard left-right scale, how do you distinguish leftists like Stalin and Gandhi? It's not sufficient to say that Stalin was simply more left than Gandhi. There are fundamental political differences between them that the old categories on their own can't explain.

Similarly, we generally describe social reactionaries as 'right-wingers', yet that leaves left-wing reactionaries like Robert Mugabe and Pol Pot off the hook.

That's about as much as we should tell you for now. After you've responded to the following propositions during the next 3-5 minutes, all will be explained. In each instance, you're asked to choose the response that best describes your feeling: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree or Strongly Agree. At the end of the test, you'll be given the compass, with your own special position on it.

The test is entirely anonymous. None of your personal details are required, and nothing about your result is recorded or logged in any way. The answers are only used to calculate your reading, and cannot be accessed by anyone, ever.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalcompass.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: philosophies; politics
I saw this ages ago on FR, but I don't recall a discussion as to where some of get "plotted down" on the chart. The survey not only charts where one is on an "economic" scale, but also on a "social" scale.

I find it fascinating...and here are the results of my chart:

Economic Left/Right: 6.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3:54

Interestingly, I am apparently closer to Silvio Berlusconi than G.W. Bush.

1 posted on 04/17/2004 12:26:26 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I don't trust the way a lot of these questions are worded. There are many implicit assumptions in the way the questions are asked, in the context in which they would be answered today.

For example - "Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified." One would expect those who favored the Iraq war to vote "Agree" and those who didn't, "Disagree". But in that is the implicit assumption, which was promulgated by our incredibly liberal media, that the Iraq war -did- violate international law. Not only did it not violate international law, there is only one war in history that had arguably more -sanction- according to international law - the Korean War. Legally, the war we just went through in Iraq was a continuation of the '91 Gulf War, and as such was more in compliance with international law than virtually any other. But most people don't realize that.

The fact that many of these questions are wrapped around the premises that the media's liberal false propaganda has been most effective in disseminating is what makes me very suspicious of it's usefulness.

Qwinn
2 posted on 04/17/2004 12:34:22 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I agree that I don't like the way some of the questions are worded. I'd love to see how they do their figuring since this shows me at about the same locus as Wesley Clark and I know for a fact that Dubya (even though I love him) is sometimes too liberal for my taste.
3 posted on 04/17/2004 12:47:35 PM PDT by FrogMom (There really ARE barbarians at the gate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
LOL, good post, good quiz.

I am pleased to see that I am nearly "on point" with my beloved Tony Blair. Mostly center, but leaning somewhat to the authoritarian right.

Didn't even notice where our beloved W falls out, I'll have to go back and check that!
4 posted on 04/17/2004 12:54:36 PM PDT by jocon307 (The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Having checked out the pres, futher out than me & tony as it happens, I am disturbed to realize there are NO world leaders who are charted as "libertarian/right". Now that's not right.

Virginia Postrel for President!
5 posted on 04/17/2004 12:57:12 PM PDT by jocon307 (The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
They explain their reasoning completely, but it is important that they don't really offer a lot of "direction"...it is not a "quiz", they say, but a "survey". No right or wrong answers--just a gauge of where one falls.

They don't give people an "out" of "no opinion"...they want us to take a stand, and they purposely make the questions ambiguous and vague.

I like the sense of trying to put the scale from left to right economically but also the top to bottom social scale.

6 posted on 04/17/2004 1:03:49 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Economic Left/ Right: 8.75
Social Libertarian/ Authoritarian: 2.92

I'm going to go take the World's Shortest Political Quiz and compare.
7 posted on 04/17/2004 1:15:25 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Proud resident of "BushCo's Flyover country".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
That was interesting. I scored:
Economic Left/Right: 5.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.26. Kind of close to Milton Friedman.

That is about what I would expect. I notice that they have Saddam Hussein, Yassir Arafat, and Robert Mugabe clumped together in one corner, close to where they have Stalin. That makes sense.

8 posted on 04/17/2004 1:15:43 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (Lurking since 1997!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I am slightly less authoritarian and slightly right of the Pope John Paul II.

Oh well...
9 posted on 04/17/2004 1:16:29 PM PDT by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avenger
I am slightly less authoritarian and slightly right of the Pope John Paul II.

Same here. I'm between JPII and Kerry. There's something wrong with this survey if Kerry is on the right. They didn't have Hillary. I didn't care for some of the wording as there were too many what ifs that could be applied.

10 posted on 04/17/2004 1:21:46 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Economic Left/Right: 7.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.03

I agree that some of the questions were difficult to answer because of their wording.

11 posted on 04/17/2004 1:24:46 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Economic Left/Right: 7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.18

12 posted on 04/17/2004 1:27:35 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
One problem with the quiz is that it doesn't allow people to indicate the statements that they feel indifferent or uncertain about. It's hard to tell whether some bald statements are true or not without a lot of thinking. Some of these propositions demand more an essay to clarify the terms and weigh the prose and cons than simple assent or disagreement.

Another problem is that one can feel something to be true in fact without wanting it to be true, or believe that something should be true morally, but recognize that it won't work in practice. What we approve of and what we would allow people to do are often two very different categories. Growing up means recognizing that what we'd want to be true and what we can expect to work out in practice may be two different things. Unfortunately, ideologists of every stripe resist this realization.

Today, in a highly ideological age, it's commonplace to assume that if one deplores or applauds something that one want's to ban or subsidize it and that one wouldn't speak about it at all, if one didn't want to make it prohibited or compulsory. But there are lots of things that one accepts in other people's behavior without agreeing that they are doing what they "should" morally or ideally. People are also used to making blanket claims of what ideally should or shouldn't be. That's fine and necessary, but many of us are looking more at what's possible and practical in the here and now with the resources we have and with human nature being what it is.

13 posted on 04/17/2004 1:32:10 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Economic 6.88
Libertarian/Authoritarin -.10
14 posted on 04/17/2004 1:46:05 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat; All
None of y'all are conservative enough economically.:)
15 posted on 04/17/2004 2:10:25 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Proud resident of "BushCo's Flyover country".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The very first question is ridiculous: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."

They make the assumption that whatever corporations do is NOT in the interest of humaniity. That says a lot about the mind set of the question writers.

16 posted on 04/17/2004 2:51:50 PM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
(Darheel)Your political compass: Economic Left/Right: 7.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.10

I'm an Arch-Conservative, this result is a no-brainer. I'm more conservative than W. If elected, I promise to end Socialism as we know it.

17 posted on 04/17/2004 6:08:28 PM PDT by Darheel (Visit the strange and wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Economic Left/Right: 6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.15

From the flack my libertarian views generate, I find it hard to believe that I place just barely libertarian.
If it is true, than most everyone you know is authoritarian.
18 posted on 04/17/2004 8:34:08 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Economic Left/Right: 0.50 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.87

He he he

19 posted on 04/17/2004 8:55:52 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (If the UN is the answer to the worlds problems the world is truly SCREWED !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Economic Left/Right: 6.75

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

20 posted on 04/18/2004 3:54:59 PM PDT by kcar (Who would OBL vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson