Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Be Surprised When Iraqi WMD Found (Rush)
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | April 20, 2004 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/20/2004 5:23:18 PM PDT by Bayou City

Don't Be Surprised When Iraqi WMD Found

April 20, 2004

I don't know if you heard about this, because it has not been widely reported. Terrorists linked to Al-Qaeda were poised to detonate a chemical bomb in the heart of Amman, Jordan, that would have killed 20,000 people and contaminated a large area. King Abdullah praised Jordan's intelligence service for foiling a crime never before seen in the kingdom of Jordan. The target was a headquarters of the general intelligence department on a hill in Amman.

King Abdullah was to be in America to meet with President Bush, but decided not to come because of this threat. Where this story gets interesting is that King Abdullah of Jordan says that the vehicles carrying these explosives, the chemical bomb, were smuggled over the border from neighboring Syria. Syria is denying this, but these are weapons of mass destruction.

Syria is a transit point for weapons of mass destruction. The whole subject of where are the weapons of mass destruction remains a focal point of mine. It remains an area of heightened curiosity, because I do not believe that they have been destroyed. I do not believe that Iraq never had them. I think Iraq had them. I think Iraq was working on them. I don't think the world's intelligence agencies are as woefully incompetent and bad and inept as the whole weapons of mass destruction issue would lead us to believe.

There are some things missing from buildings in Iraq, and there's too much speculation out there about how some of this stuff can be miniaturized and transported out of the country easily. Syria is an obvious place, and many people I respect have pointed to the Bekaa Valley as a place as well. We're not going to invade Syria any time soon to find out, but this is the second example of weapons of mass destruction-type coming out of Syria.

Now, they had to get to Syria somehow. I just want to keep your mind open to the possibility that these weapons of mass destruction from Iraq are somewhere, and they've not been destroyed. They haven't just vanished into the ether, and I'm going to make a prediction to you that all of the liberals and critics of the president who have harped on this and jumped on this have once again jumped the gun. They are a little premature here because we don't know yet what, if anything, did happen to those weapons of mass destruction, despite knowing that they did exist. So keep your hats on and don't be surprised down the road what is learned at some point.

Yellow cake uranium has been found at junk yards in Rotterdam and that's exactly what Iraq was looking for. This stuff could have been disbursed over the years to any number of places, and if you think that an Al-Qaeda related group is going to blow up Amman, Jordan with weapons that were procured from Syria, if you think that Al-Qaeda is not related to what all was going on in Iraq, and the Middle East, then you are engaged in blindness or wishful thinking. That is the position of the left, and that's why they can't be trusted to be placed in a leadership position.

Read the Articles...

(CNN: Jordan 'thwarts massive attack')
('UK Telegraph: Al-Qa'eda plot would have killed 20,000')
(NewsMax: King Abdullah: Al Qaeda WMDs Came From Syria)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; iraq; jordan; rush; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-250 next last
To: M1Tanker
"...financial aid to terrorists that Saddam BRAGGED about!" You left out the financial aid to the U.N. 'dignitaries', to the 'king' of France and the Schroeder goons.
221 posted on 04/20/2004 9:50:54 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Fell asleep in history class all the way through college huh?

I am impressed though by your mastery of all the mindless progressive talking points... "guarantee"... "nation building"... "crap"... "enlightened despotism", the usual wannabe eloquent empty phrases, conveying a psychological tick and void of any real information.

222 posted on 04/20/2004 9:53:33 PM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: js1138
8:21 a.m.: So that leaves about 20 minutes for the United States to make and execute a decision to shoot down civilian airliners over the heavily inhabited northeast.

8:21 was the time of the phone call from the flight attendant. The air traffic control signal went dead and the plane stopped following orders at 8:13. The second plane didn't hit the WTC until 9:03 AM. That's 50 minutes. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon at times published as between 9:37 and 9:43. That's 90 minutes. Flight 93 crashed at 10:06 AM. That's just 7 minutes short of 2 hours.

223 posted on 04/20/2004 9:56:32 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
How have you managed to survive 2 years in FR?

Or is your drinking just sporadic

224 posted on 04/20/2004 9:57:41 PM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bayou City
I won't be surprised in the least, El Rushbo -- I've been predicting it for a long time now. The egg on the faces on the WMD-deniers on FR alone will be enough to impact the chicken industry.
225 posted on 04/20/2004 10:01:04 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywarner
Again, we are all STILL waiting for your official source in regards to your previous statement that no air cover was in the air for several hours after the 9/11 attacks.

There was 1 hour and 53 minutes between the first notification that flight 11 was off course and not responding and the time that flight 93 crashed.

For that matter, what is your official source to back up your statement that fighters are scrambled within 5-10 minutes of a hijacking (prior to 9/11)?

A former Pentagon air traffic controller says "All those years ago when I was at the Pentagon, this wouldn't have happened. ATC Radar images were (and are) available in the understructures of the Pentagon, and any commercial flight within 300 miles of D. C. that made an abrupt course change toward Washington, or turned off their transponder and refused to communicate with ATC, would have been intercepted at supersonic speeds within minutes by fighters out of Andrews AFB. Why there were no fighters from Andrews AFB up baffles me. If we could get fighters notified, scrambled, and airborne within about 6 minutes from Andrews AFB then, we could now."
Before the attacks, the protocols had been relaxed during the Clinton administration.

I'm happy to place the blame on the Clinton administration. But the fact is that one way or another our defense was not ready to defend us when an actual attack occurred.

AGAIN, I ask you, were those two F-16's on afterburner that I saw peeling overhead that morning at about 9:20am just a figment of my imagination? I will answer it for you.

I already posted answers to that question twice.

226 posted on 04/20/2004 10:03:10 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
By your clock, an hour and twenty minutes elapsed between evidence that a plane had been hijacked, and the time the last plane struck the Pentagon. About thirty to forty minutes elapsed between the first hit and the last.

During that period, at most about 45 minutes, the U.S. is going to make the unprecedented decision to shoot down civilian airliners?

You are insane.
227 posted on 04/20/2004 10:06:20 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: js1138
During that period, at most about 45 minutes, the U.S. is going to make the unprecedented decision to shoot down civilian airliners?

Shouldn't there have been a plan for that contingency already in place? And what evidence do you have that there isn't such a plan in place? And maybe it was even put into action. One would hope that our national defense forces would have considered this possibility, since even the Columbine killers had thought of the same plan, hijack a plane and crash it into NYC.

228 posted on 04/20/2004 10:11:02 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
"In the land of the giant, the one-eyed man is king." I suppose that in the land of the pygmies, one needn't be a giant to tower over the others.

Thanks for the confirmation, nut case. Ted Kazynski thought he was too smart for the rest of us to understand him too. Where is he now? The booby hatch? Delusional twit!

229 posted on 04/20/2004 10:11:35 PM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml
230 posted on 04/20/2004 10:15:45 PM PDT by narses (Who is General Failure and why is he reading my disk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Shouldn't there have been a plan for that contingency already in place?

Tell me your politically acceptable plan to prevent the next really big terrorist attack.

Please bear in mind that preventive measures are generally known to the public, and terrorists will know them and attempt to plan around them. They might even take advantage of your policies and past behavior.

So knock yourself out. Predict the future.

231 posted on 04/20/2004 10:17:03 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Thanks for the confirmation, nut case. Ted Kazynski thought he was too smart for the rest of us to understand him too. Where is he now? The booby hatch? Delusional twit!

With unanswerable arguments like those, I will have to give up and admit defeat. How could I have ever hoped to match my puny wits against erudition of this magnitude?

232 posted on 04/20/2004 10:19:02 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; narses; M1Tanker
...There is not the tiniest shred of evidence that Saddam Hussein was connected to 911 in any way...

OK Max I have to ask... How do you know there is no evidence connecting Hussein to 911? If you can give a credible answer I'll be impressed, if not your statement is nothing but pure innuendo.

... According to the official story, at least, they did absolutely zero to protect us from the 4 hijacked planes...

So what is the official story? Do you have one?

233 posted on 04/20/2004 10:32:32 PM PDT by Bayou City
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: narses
Do you have anything to support or agree with this story? One would think that such "huge" evidence would have been reported elsewhere. Maybe other news sources were unimpressed by the author, who had wrongly extradited Demjanjuk to Israel. I don't recall any government official citing this story. If it is "huge", then where is the rest of the enormity?
234 posted on 04/20/2004 10:37:50 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
I'm rarely surprised in early October!!!

LOL

235 posted on 04/20/2004 10:43:28 PM PDT by Texasforever (God Bless And Keep Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01
America should retreat to the original 13 sovereign states and let the rest of the world take care of itself.

No, those original 13 should be given back to the Native Americans. We should all go back to the countries of our ancestors.
236 posted on 04/20/2004 11:43:29 PM PDT by jaykay (Government: half parasitic, half incompetent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bayou City
Bump for later read
237 posted on 04/21/2004 12:46:38 AM PDT by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
My opinion is take the troops out and send in the nukes to finish the job.
That should have happened at 8:45 AM Eastern time on 9/12/01.

Very true
238 posted on 04/21/2004 12:48:43 AM PDT by armyboy (Posting from Sustainer Army Airfield Balad, Iraq. All Gave Some...Some Gave All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
"Leave it to the Europeans"

Have you ever considered why Europe is in the condition it is in now? Could it be that after centuries of nations battling nations, some other country stepped in and showed them how they could live for the most part without war. Do you think it would be possible for that the European Union would have ever seen the light of day without the occupation of the countries that seemed to generate the most problems for the rest of Europe?

A stablizing force was necessary there, as it is now in the Mid-east. There are things we could be doing better, but is far better that we are doing what we are rather than waiting for another attack on our home.
239 posted on 04/21/2004 1:34:29 AM PDT by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
The point was that while we were busy engaging in quarrels all over the world, our actual defense of our own country was sorely lacking, as was proven in a time of need. Your information confirms that we had been gutting our actual defense at the same time that we were spreading our forces more and more thinly around the world. Do you disagree with that assessment?

I absolutly agree that, under Clinton, the defense of the contenental USA, and our overall defense ability (from civilian defense capability to miitary) was gutted to the point we could not function. This, combined with our lack of decisive response to multiple terrorist attacks during the same administration and several other cultural and societal factors lead to the US becomming an underdefended target as well as a high visibility one.

I will say there have been vast improvements in the past couple of years. Unfortunatly, it usually takes a 9-11 or Pearl Harbor type event to wake people up to the fact the world has evil people in it. We have made great strides with little negative impact to the economy and civilian life in the US. In WWII, we had to impose rationing and force ourselves to improve our industry and infrastructure quickly. We now have several layers of defensive preparations in place. Are they inpregnable? Absolutly not. We have to be right 100% of the time, but the terrorists only have to be right once. But we are doing everything we can, under the law, to prevent them from being right that one time. Is there more work to be done? Absolutly! And we have to keep improving, but that improvment becomes unfeasable when it starts encroaching on American civilians. The goal then becomes how to improve our defense without upsetting the American People. Unfortunatly, this will probably only effectivly happen when a hole in our defenses in exploited.

240 posted on 04/21/2004 4:15:47 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Modern "progressive" liberalism is just NAZIism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson