Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's Hear It for the Good Guys (Bill O'Reilly sends a shot across Canada's bow)
Jewish World Review ^ | May 17, 2004 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 05/19/2004 9:17:44 AM PDT by quidnunc

For once, let's hear it for the good guys. If every country in the world fought terrorism as aggressively as the USA and Great Britain, the truly bad guys would be beaten down, perhaps forever.

But hoping that the nations of the world will respond cohesively to the savagery and potential mass destruction of modern terror is a lost cause. We live in a world of denial and self-interest. You have as much chance of finding the Wizard of Oz as you do persuading some timid and misguided countries to join the fight against the Islama-fascists.

Even countries like Canada are no longer dependable allies. According to a Macleans poll, 38% of Canadians say their attitude toward the USA has worsened since 9/11. Almost half of our friends to the north see America as arrogant, bullying or dangerous.

To be sure, the Bush administration's non-compromising stance in Iraq and insistence that terror-enabling states be confronted (Axis of Evil) have put off many foreigners who embrace a far more passive approach toward terrorism. But the Canadian situation exemplifies what is truly going on in this world.

Over the past two decades, Canada has become committed to secularism and government entitlements. Subsidized medical care, decriminalization of marijuana, gay marriage, extensive welfare for newly arrived immigrants and an aggressively liberal Canadian Broadcasting Company have all become part of the culture. The eastern Canadian press is especially anti-American, and delights in hammering their more traditional American neighbors.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at billoreilly.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: CWOJackson

"Always got time for Tim Horton's!"


21 posted on 05/19/2004 12:03:26 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Bump for later reading.


22 posted on 05/19/2004 12:50:34 PM PDT by Born Conservative (It really sucks when your 15 minutes of fame comes AFTER you're gone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

My 30 years experience with Canadiens, though mostly those from Yukon, NWT, northern B.C., rural Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, has been positive.They are very aware of the creeping socialism foisted upon them by liberal immigration policies inundating their country with euroweenies and ecofreaks. There is a federal election on the horizon and there is a good chance the conservatives can regain some control over the government, if not total control. Check LUFA and Free Dominion and you will see the contempt for the liberals and their policies.


23 posted on 05/19/2004 12:56:36 PM PDT by Alaska Wolf (Trained by English Setters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolf
Mind you I am sure that if Canada were ever in danger we would act.

We would act, but they might have to take a number if we were already involved elsewhere. But, I guess they are used to waiting.

24 posted on 05/19/2004 1:42:06 PM PDT by jwalburg (There's more indignation over a prisoner with underwear on his head than one with no head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

Maybe we should send an armored brigade across the border and occupy Winnepeg. The ransom would be enough beer for all the troops. Don't think the Mounties will pull them over for drunk driving.


25 posted on 05/19/2004 2:01:14 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Luv

It seems to be taking them an awful long time on Tre Arrow's extradition too.


26 posted on 05/19/2004 2:49:37 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

agreed... but then again they have to wait for a doctor, a real sport.. (sorry no offense to hockey)... come on is curling really a sport or an excuse to freeze your but off while drinking? Plus really anyone attacking them has limited access options anyway. except by air.


27 posted on 05/19/2004 2:56:57 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Former Navy AO3... IYAOYAS!!!! Population control and landscaping with a bang!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
Al-Qaeda says Canada deserves bombing
28 posted on 05/19/2004 3:51:39 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot – I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolf
Mind you I am sure that if Canada were ever in danger we would act.

Yes, we'll act by sending some “inspectors” into Canada for 12 years, longer if needed, and give them the benefit of our criticism advise.

But, Canada won't need our help, their allies, France and Germany, will rush in to defend Canada.

29 posted on 05/19/2004 4:43:44 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
"Even countries like Canada are no longer dependable allies.

"The Libs have been running that shytehole for so long that the "canadians" (haha, yuk) spell democracy "F-A-S-C-I-S-M"

30 posted on 05/19/2004 8:23:13 PM PDT by Darheel (Visit the strange and wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolf

When you think about it, though, who would actually fight and put troops at risk to win -- Canada? Seems like a pretty unlikely scenario and they know it.


31 posted on 05/19/2004 9:18:22 PM PDT by jwalburg (There's more indignation over a prisoner with underwear on his head than one with no head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
We only have one border to defend and that's the one separating the US and Canada. Neither the US or Canada has enough money of soldiers to defend it, which is why it's called "the world's largest undefended border", something we used to take pride in on both sides of the divide.

Yes our army is limited to national defence an peacekeeping operations under the aegis of the UN. That's why we call the DND, the Department of National Defence. (Google Lester B Pearson, Suez Crisis regarding reasons for this long standing Canadian policy.)

Oh and next time you need someone to do forward recon/sniper duty in desert and arctic conditions, call the Italians.

see:
http://www.timelapse.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=187)

and on the JTF-2 commandos see:
http://www.canadaka.net/cka/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=397

On the subject of deserters, when the two American's are charged and convicted of desertion and the US government requests their extradition they probably will be returned to the US because their refugee claim isn't a strong one. They did enlist after all. They signed a contract and it's binding.

The situation may be complicated if the US government demands the option of a death penalty. O'Reilly's answer to that is curious. He says the war in Iraq is "undeclared" so the US is unlikely to demand the death penalty. If he's correct, the war in Iraq was "undeclared" by all but one member of Congress.

I think we can all agree that the US declared on Iraq. (the declaration of the right to unilateral intervention in Iraq is a defacto declaration of war, 11th hour UN acquiescence aside).

Having said that, the Canadian government isn't going to turn the deserters over without due process and no US administration in it's right mind would ask including Bush2. What if Canada turned over a US citizen to a country other than the US just because charges had been laid, would that be OK with O'Reilly? Final note: neither of the two men have denied that they're deserters.

Bill O'Reilly is just blowing smoke because it makes good copy. If he's a journalist rather than a lowly commentator, he should check his facts.
32 posted on 05/19/2004 10:16:52 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever
Having said that, the Canadian government isn't going to turn the deserters over without due process and no US administration in it's right mind would ask including Bush2. What if Canada turned over a US citizen to a country other than the US just because charges had been laid, would that be OK with O'Reilly? Final note: neither of the two men have denied that they're deserters.

I would think that Canada will turn them over once they've been officially charged. I don't know that they have been charged as yet. As for turning over a US citizen to a 3rd country, I think that is a separate issue from that of returning a national to his country of origin, and it just confuses the issue.

33 posted on 05/20/2004 8:08:42 AM PDT by Tallguy (Take the President, lay the points...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

You may be right, an indictment may be sufficiant. I'm not a lawyer so I'm not sure. At any rate in spite of existing indictment once they've filed refuge claims; those claims must be heard, adjudicated and of course appealed, so it's not a simple matter of handing them over to a legal jurisdiction.

I think that is what the debate is about over this; once a refuge claim is made in Canada you're locked into a process that may take years depending on the case. As some Immigration Officials have already said, the two soldiers do not have a strong case so this is unlikely to drag on.

As for turning a US citizen over to a 3rd country; I mentioned that only because the US government did just that last year to a Canadian citizen of Iranian descent. They arrested him in New York and deported him, to Syria of all places, where he was tortured. It was later determined that he was arrested as a result of information provided by Canadian authorities.

The guy has been returned to Canada but there's still an argument going on about the truth of the information that sent him there and of course, why Syria?

So when I bring up the example of third country involvemnt I mean to highlight the danger that, in the absence of due process, innocent people could find themselves on a plane to Syria or "disappeared" entirely, just on the say so of some bureaucratic nudge in the CSIS, who has a James Bond complex.

Thanks for the response Tallguy


34 posted on 05/20/2004 1:36:19 PM PDT by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

35 posted on 05/20/2004 9:51:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in al-Qerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
My sister works for a non-profit information agency that provides support to people with intestinal diseases.

She got a call from some gal in Canada and they talked a bit about her problems and symptoms. My sister said she'd send their information packets and then suggested she set up an appointment with her gastroendinolist.

Canada girl said she had been to see him and could only see him once a year because of their health system.

36 posted on 05/21/2004 12:43:57 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

About three weeks ago, while southbound on US23 near Fenton, Michigan, I overtook a Ford Focus with Canadian plates. In the back window was a Kerry for President sign, the kind of sign normally seen in someone's front yard.


37 posted on 05/21/2004 1:00:27 AM PDT by RushLake (Permission from the UN...we don't need no stinking permission slip from the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

The entire city of Montreal (almost 2M people) has a grand total of one "official" MRI machine. The government turns a blind eye to illegal operators of MRIs because obviously they can't get by with only one machine.


38 posted on 05/21/2004 1:05:47 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
the only thing the Canadian military is good for now is "peacekeeping"

Not sure that dog is going to hunt either.

the Somalia affair: the 1993 torture and murder of a Somali teenager by Canadian airborne soldiers, and the culture of racism and brutality in the ranks that it exposed.

The Somalia revelations during 1994 and 1995 anguished the nation and traumatized the Canadian military. The perpetrators were court-martialed. But a military inquiry continues into the events surrounding the murder as well as the chain of command -- and what looks like a cover-up -- all the way to the Department of National Defense in Ottawa.

The Canadian airborne was disbanded in January after the murder of Shidane Arone, a teenage Somali thief, was followed by embarrassing videotaped footage of racism and brutal hazing in the regiment formerly known for its wartime heroics. One segment depicted Canada's U.N. peacekeepers in Somalia referring to local citizens as "nig-nogs" and joking about hunting Somalis as trophies.

Another tape showed a black airborne recruit crawling through a gantlet of blows and a shower of human waste with the words "I love KKK" scrawled on his back. That soldier later said he hadn't minded the treatment, in the context of the hazing ritual, and didn't consider his buddies racists.

Of course this article goes on to blame the entire incident on the US but well that's what we expect from Eurotrash and wanna be Eurotrash.
39 posted on 05/21/2004 1:11:41 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter; 3catsanadog
Some of the other problems with the Canadian medi-care is that it is an age based triage system, which means that the older the patient, the less access to care and the more likely you are to die of preventable causes. Canada also has the highest number of of enrollees in a public health care system and the lowest per capita number of physicians. There is at least a two month wait to see an oncologist after being diagnosed with breast cancer, longer for some other specialists. Of course the most glaring fault is that the politicians and the wealthy are exempt from this fate.

Straight Vermonter, I just came back from my sister-in-law's funeral in Stowe and I have to say that Vermont has really become the state of the haves and have nots. What a bunch of phony hypocrites, offering all that socialism to the poor native Vermonters, while the wealthy new comers seek medical care elsewhere.
40 posted on 05/21/2004 9:18:55 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson