Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remote-Controlled Throwable Robot Sent To Iraq For Testing
spacedaily.com ^ | 6/24/04 | Pittsburgh PA (SPX) (???)

Posted on 06/27/2004 1:06:05 AM PDT by endthematrix

Carnegie Mellon University robotics researchers, in conjunction with the U.S. Marine Corps' Warfighting Laboratory, have developed a small, throwable, remote-controlled prototype robot designed for surveillance in urban settings. Several of the robots are being sent to Iraq for testing. The robot, known as Dragon Runner, has the ability to see around corners and deliver information to Marines while keeping them out of danger in urban settings where human access is impractical, dangerous or unsustainable.

The Dragon Runner project is managed and funded by the Warfighting Laboratory (Quantico, Va.), which is part of the Marine Corps Combat Development Command. The system has been under development for more than two years and has already undergone rigorous testing in a variety of austere environments.

"The Dragon Runner can function in loose soil with small obstacles but is most effective on relatively flat surfaces like streets and sidewalks, making it ideal for an urban, desert environment," said Captain Dave Moreau, Dragon Runner Project Officer with the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab.

"We have conducted a thorough evaluation of its capabilities in an urban, desert environment at both the former George Air Force Base, in Victorville, Calif., and Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas. The next step is to test Dragon Runner operationally in theater."

The architect behind Dragon Runner is Hagen Schempf, a principal research scientist in Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Institute. During his career, Schempf has designed robotic systems for asbestos removal, nuclear waste remediation and cleanup of underground storage tanks containing toxic materials.

"Dragon Runner is the lightest, smallest, most rugged, readily portable robot system for remote scouting operations in existence today," he said. "It has the potential to be the eyes and ears of the Marines in forward urban operations, allowing them to gather intelligence without being in harm's way. It is a tool that reduces potential lethal exposure to our troops by reducing the amount of time that they expose themselves to danger."

The Warfighting Laboratory describes Dragon Runner as a small, four-wheeled, all-wheel drive, invertible, tossable, remotely operated, low-cost, man-portable, mobile ground sensor designed to increase situational awareness at the small unit level (i.e., company and below) in urban environments.

In today's modern battle spaces, potential enemies capitalize on the asymmetric nature of urban areas. In response, Dragon Runner can provide real-time imagery of tactical objectives and potential danger areas beyond a Marine's line of sight during day or night.

Dragon Runner can stand in sentry mode by using several onboard motion and audio sensors to monitor selected areas. It may also be configured to carry mission-specific payloads. The complete system includes the vehicle, an operator control system and a controller configured for one-handed operation, all held in a custom backpack.

Dragon Runner has a top speed of more than 20 miles per hour but also can be operated with slow deliberate control. It operates in a mode similar to modern video games and can be deployed from its backpack in less than three seconds.

In addition to his work at the Robotics Institute, Schempf is chief scientist at Automatika, a Pittsburgh-based company he founded in 1995, that develops novel, high-value-added robotic and automation systems. Automatika was responsible for the development of Dragon Runner's rugged distributed vehicle electronics and the development of its impact-tolerant chassis and shell.

Automatika has licensed the Dragon Runner technology from Carnegie Mellon to explore the civilian opportunities for such a system. They believe there could be a variety of uses, i.e., in civil defense, SWAT, protecting the nation's borders and in criminal defense.

Schempf emphasized that after testing is complete, the university will not be involved in developing a military version of the system, which the Marine Corps may wish to procure through its military acquisition channels.

"What we're doing is not classified," he said. "It's about developing a new operational capability using innovative technologies and cutting-edge manufacturing and assembly methods."

According to William A. Thomasmeyer, president of the Robotics Foundry, an independent, non-profit economic development organization that directs programs and initiatives to accelerate the growth of an applied robotics industry in western Pennsylvania, Automatika is on track to become a robotics success story.

"If Dragon Runner is able to prove its mettle, it's likely to become the first mass-produced, agile, robotic product to be invented, engineered and manufactured in southwestern Pennsylvania," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iraq; miltech; robot; robotics

1 posted on 06/27/2004 1:06:05 AM PDT by endthematrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Great for us while we have the monopoly on the technology. It begs the question, though....what happens in five or ten years when things like this are available off the shelf? Robot car bombs? Maybe we're approaching the day when the battlefield is just too dangerous for humans, and all the combat will be done by machines.


2 posted on 06/27/2004 1:12:29 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Proof that watching Robot Wars wasn't a waste of our time!

3 posted on 06/27/2004 1:13:35 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Bye, Bye humans. Welcome to the machines!


4 posted on 06/27/2004 1:14:36 AM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Righteous tag!


5 posted on 06/27/2004 1:16:32 AM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Battle Bots. Gotta love em.


6 posted on 06/27/2004 1:24:55 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

I'm currently saving for a F-350 Superduty with a 8" lift and 35" BFG tires. I love my hour long commute! Watch out!


7 posted on 06/27/2004 1:27:54 AM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Jeep Wrangler ownz u


8 posted on 06/27/2004 1:31:15 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
I'm working on my '80 CJ-5 and my DD is a stock Cherokee. I married into a Mopar family. Had a Chevy and my father in law told me to get it off his property. Had to sell it to marry his daughter. Then my wife "suckered" me into getting my project jeep, now over four years rebuilding, glass tub and all the goodies.
9 posted on 06/27/2004 1:41:12 AM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kms61

You're about 15 years behind the times. They had robot car bombs in a dirty harry movie years ago.


10 posted on 06/27/2004 1:43:22 AM PDT by flashbunny (Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

for your viewing


11 posted on 06/27/2004 2:11:10 AM PDT by Khurkris (Will the wind ever remember the names it has blown in the past, It whispers no this will be the last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Robot "car" bombs could be a problem some day, but right now they would stand out as obvious threats and would be shot up by sentries (if they're big enough to do any major damage.) Unquestionably we need much better surveillance technology to secure a country like Iraq, and this is a start.


12 posted on 06/27/2004 3:21:00 AM PDT by carl in alaska (Suddenly the raven on Scalia's desk stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Don't worry. As soon as the Muslims and their friends cry foul, we'll take the robot out of service.


13 posted on 06/27/2004 3:22:08 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
[dumb blonde/surf dude]

They're small enough to put in a backpack and "throw" into action? Doesn't this also mean, like, that somebody can, like, PICK ONE UP AND THROW IT INTO THE NEAREST RIVER?

Like, sheesh...

[/dumb blonde/surf dude]

14 posted on 06/27/2004 3:55:53 AM PDT by DJ Frisat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

I hope that is also contains explosives that can be remotely detonated!


15 posted on 06/27/2004 4:39:34 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Wait till the RATS in both Congress and academia find out that Carnegie Mellon University is cooperating with the USMC. This robot program will be shut down fast unless it can be proved that these robotic "weapons of war" can be converted to delivering food to people too lazy to go to work, or can perform abortions.
16 posted on 06/27/2004 4:52:16 AM PDT by Lockbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9
It may also be configured to carry mission-specific payloads.

My guess is the thing would be armed with enough explosives to - um - discourage the enemy from trying to pick one up.

17 posted on 06/27/2004 4:54:52 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kms61

Heck these things ARE available off the shelf. Just go down to Radio Shack or any toy store. There are some very robust robotic toys that could be very easily modified to carry a camera or a small bomb. Even I could do it. They are so cheap, they could be disposable.


18 posted on 06/27/2004 5:04:10 AM PDT by numberonepal (goodnewsamerica.us Fast News For Common Sense People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The battlebot version has an anti personnel spike.

Looks like its good for picking up beer cans.

19 posted on 06/27/2004 5:10:28 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kms61
Great for us while we have the monopoly on the technology. It begs the question, though....what happens in five or ten years when things like this are available off the shelf?

Since PC's came out, I've been wanting to get a good programmable robot. However, what they're selling commerically, like Lego Mindstorms, is expensive and/or fragile and/or is limited in the directions it can see and/or can't climb or navigate obstancles well. I think that the military stuff is likely to continue to be far superior to what is off the shelf.

Plus, if they love death like we love life, they have no need for gadgets to make reconnaissance safer.

20 posted on 06/27/2004 5:19:49 AM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
This is nothing. Most of my equipment is throwable.

I've got a throwable laptop-- not really remote-controllable, though-- in fact, it doesn't even work very well if you're typing right on it...

21 posted on 06/27/2004 5:47:05 AM PDT by Egon (Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egon
..in fact, it doesn't even work very well if you're typing right on it...

..ZOT! :p

22 posted on 06/27/2004 7:11:00 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

How would these robots cross a trench?


23 posted on 06/27/2004 7:13:05 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny


They had robot car bombs

The Germans had them in WW II. called Goliath.

Used to blow tanks and hard points, bunkers etc.

Small tracked vehicles, wire guided.


24 posted on 06/27/2004 7:16:05 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Wait for the new F600


25 posted on 06/27/2004 7:35:18 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thud

ping


26 posted on 06/27/2004 7:55:47 AM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
Goliath.


27 posted on 06/27/2004 8:02:42 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
They had robot car bombs in a dirty harry movie years ago.

I don't remember a Clint Eastwood movie; but I remember a not-too-great Tom Selleck one.

28 posted on 06/27/2004 8:26:45 AM PDT by solitas ("HA HA!" (Nelson Muntz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kms61

I want one that emits the Howard Dean scream when you throw it.


29 posted on 06/27/2004 8:30:02 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
Thanks. Saw this on Future Fighting Machines. They really do sling into windows.
30 posted on 06/27/2004 8:51:42 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: solitas
The star of Runaway was Gene Simmons! Also what about Minority Report's autonomous robots? That was straight from a current DARPA program.
31 posted on 06/27/2004 10:45:12 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
Ah unless you have one that can WALK ON WATER.

MIT leaps to solution of walking-on-water mystery

32 posted on 06/27/2004 11:02:09 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I would think that a big trench with steep walls would stop any small robot. These small robots are designed for urban warfare where the robots can drive on relatively smooth streets and our adversaries will not be dug in deep. You probably need a UAV or toy chopper for a battfield out in the country where the enemy is dug into trenches and bunkers.


33 posted on 06/28/2004 12:12:21 AM PDT by carl in alaska (Suddenly the raven on Scalia's desk stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson