Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein Gun Ban Could Come up in the Senate Next Week
Gun Owners of America ^ | July 1, 2004

Posted on 07/02/2004 10:02:42 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Mr. Mojo

"Back in March, he chose NOT to use these parliamentary maneuvers during the debacle over the ill-fated gun makers' protection act. "

And why not?

The Dems always use every possible tactic and maneuver,the Republicans virtually never do. That's why the Dems are more successful in either pushing their agenda through, or stopping ours, even with the Republican leadership.

It's time for the Republicans to wake up and fight fire with fire.


21 posted on 07/03/2004 4:52:10 AM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Fienswine should be the first politico charged with sedition.


22 posted on 07/03/2004 4:55:12 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Fineswinesucks.


23 posted on 07/03/2004 5:51:24 AM PDT by b4its2late (John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Recent Department of Justice records indicate that the use of banned assault weapons in crimes has declined measurably -- by 65% in one analysis

The use declined by 65%?
That indicates - by one analysis - that fewer genuine imitation assault weapons were used. That’s not surprising when it is considered they can no longer be imported of manufactured here - they ones available are now outrageously expensive.
How much has the use of “Uzis and AK-47s” declined?
I’m still waiting to hear from him on the subject of how an “assault weapons” ban that does not ban any assault weapons saves lives.
…has not infringed upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

It has infringed on my right - I would like to have an M-14 like the one I carried in Viet Nam - but the few on the market are way out of my price range.
24 posted on 07/03/2004 6:33:55 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
What's a California Freeper to do?

Well, I'm gonna call Feinswine's office and complain that putting this issue on the table now may harm Boxer's chances for re-election. :-)

Bang!

25 posted on 07/03/2004 6:35:19 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

http://www.jpfo.org


26 posted on 07/03/2004 7:08:29 AM PDT by society-by-contract
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Fienstein has lost it.

Suppose she gets to add the Sport Utility Rifle Ban to the Class acrion limitation.

Now Dem Senators are either going to have to explain to the Trial Lawyers (their biggest financial supporters) why they voted to limit Class actions
OR
Explain to the gun grabber lobby, why after getting a gun ban measure to a vote, they all vote against it.

One Senator might be able to get away with "I voted for it, before I voted against it", but all of them?

27 posted on 07/03/2004 7:17:34 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (/"Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Note sent to Frist. Let's hope he gets his backbone and cajones back from deep storage soon enough to do some about it.


28 posted on 07/03/2004 7:27:21 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Throwing rocks at the opposition would make the rocks assult weapons wouldn't it? So lets ban rocks since they could be thrown in an offensive posture.

Any item that could be used to inflict damage could be considered an assult weapon. Kitchen knives, automobiles, airplanes, slingshots, fists, can all be considered assult weapons using the generalities anti gunners describe firearms being "assult weapons".

A gun has always been intended to appear threatening because a firearm is not only an offensive tool, but a defensive tool. The same mentality the gun banners use is to outlaw pit bulls and doberman dogs because they intimidate the weak in stature without ever actually biting them. Politicians, being weak in stature, fear the picture of a firearm that could depose them from their position of authority. Feinstein is a Commie in disguise.


29 posted on 07/03/2004 7:29:29 AM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
If Specter supports the gun ban this time around, I'm voting Democrat.
30 posted on 07/03/2004 7:43:43 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

Is that a Swarovski scope on that .50? And that flash looks like you must have a muzzle break.


31 posted on 07/03/2004 7:54:39 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
....If, on the other hand, Feinstein is successful in forcing her amendment to the president's desk, Bush has indicated that he will sign the ban --...

If W signs an AWB, he will follow in his fathers footsteps.

one term only.

God help us all.
32 posted on 07/03/2004 7:56:03 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Why? Is his Rat opponent more conservative on this (or any other) issue? I can see voting 3rd party or even staying home in protest, but unless the Rat in question is a very unusual one - a Zell Miller-type, for instance - I don't see the purpose of voting for him/her.

....or perhaps were you were being sarcastic.

33 posted on 07/03/2004 7:57:42 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Vote Hoeffel anyway. We cannot allow that socialist Sphincter to Chair the Senate Judiciary Commitee!!! Bork em'


34 posted on 07/03/2004 7:58:48 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gdc61
If, on the other hand, Feinstein is successful in forcing her amendment to the president's desk.........

She can't force jack -- it has to pass the House (where she has no influence), and the chance of that happening is very slim. I'd be very surprised if this thing sees the top of Dubya's desk.

35 posted on 07/03/2004 8:01:45 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
actually, voting for the Socialist Dem Hoeffel is GOOD for the whole country.

Specter(pro-abortion,pro-stemcell,pro-gunlaws,ect..)is next in line for the Senate Judiciary Chairmanship and will "litmus test" every nominee that his cronies the Dems don't like. effectively setting back our movement to elect conservative judges years, maybe decades.

If Specter is defeated in November Sen. Kyl ,one of the highest rated(ACU)conservative Senator will be Chair of the SJC.
so hold your nose and vote Dem for Sen. in PA.
36 posted on 07/03/2004 8:11:08 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

bump


37 posted on 07/03/2004 8:16:13 AM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I agree.
W's statement was a blunt warning to us. He is relying on us to let our Senators and congressmen know how we feel. If WE fail to control our Representatives.
38 posted on 07/03/2004 8:17:46 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gdc61

whoops...If WE fail to control our Representatives... we deserve what we get.


39 posted on 07/03/2004 8:22:50 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Physicist; Darth Sidious
If Specter supports the gun ban this time around, I'm voting Democrat.

Careful now. Darth got banned from FR for saying the same thing about Liddy Dole. (later reinstated)

40 posted on 07/03/2004 8:28:54 AM PDT by snopercod (The Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock because they had run out of ale. The rest is history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson