Skip to comments.Feinstein Gun Ban Could Come up in the Senate Next Week
Posted on 07/02/2004 10:02:42 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
On Tuesday, the Senate is scheduled to begin consideration of legislation to limit class action lawsuits -- a prime candidate for so-called liberal "killer amendments," including the Feinstein amendment to extend the ban on semiautomatic firearms and magazines.
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has threatened to offer her semi-auto ban to any "appropriate" legislative vehicle, and the class action bill is about as "appropriate" as any on the Senate's legislative schedule.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has, at his disposal, a variety of parliamentary techniques to prevent Feinstein from offering the semiautomatic ban. Back in March, he chose NOT to use these parliamentary maneuvers during the debacle over the ill-fated gun makers' protection act.
The debate over this pro-gun bill resulted in a free-for-all which led to killer amendments being added to the bill -- amendments like the Feinstein gun ban.
GOA is urging Frist to learn from his mistakes and to use his leadership office to insure that the Feinstein amendment is not offered to S. 2062.
America is at a crossroads on the Second Amendment. If the pro-gun community can succeed in killing the extension of the semi-auto ban (due to expire on September 13) we will have inflicted a serious blow on the anti-gun zealots -- a blow from which they will not soon recover.
If, on the other hand, Feinstein is successful in forcing her amendment to the president's desk, Bush has indicated that he will sign the ban -- and the pro-gun community will be on the defensive and facing the anti-gunners' next priority: a comprehensive gun registration scheme.
ACTION: Please contact Senate Majority Leader Frist. Tell him to use whatever parliamentary tools are necessary to block consideration of the Feinstein semi-auto ban -- particularly as an amendment to the class action bill.
You can call Senator Frist at (202) 224-3344, or go to http://www.frist.senate.gov and select "Contact Senator Frist" under the "About Senator Frist" heading to send a message similar to the one below.
----- Pre-written letter -----
Dear Senator Frist:
America is at a crossroads. If we are successful in blocking the Feinstein semiautomatic ban, we will have inflicted a major blow to the anti-gun community -- a blow from which it will not soon recover.
Therefore, we would urge you to use any parliamentary tools at your disposal to prevent this amendment from being offered -- particularly to the class action bill. Thank you.
"Any Republican who would support a bill outlawing an otherwise legal rifle due to the presence of a bayonet lug, deserves no support from gun owners. Ever. The appearance of a Republican majority is of no use to gun owners if that majority includes people who would infringe the right to keep and bear arms."
I have been wondering why FReepers who know a lot about war haven't been making the point that war is happening on our own soil.
Lee Malmo, John Mohammed, the cells busted in Seattle, Portland, OR, and various other places are events in addition to
9-11. War is here.
We have to tell our political and cultural betters that we are going to need at least semi-automatic weapons in easy reach of all patriotic citizens everywhere. The others already have their weapons, have actually used them, and their numbers continually grow.
Frankly, I'd like my friends and neighbors to at least match the firepower of the terrorists amongst us.
We have a story to tell, and we're not doing it. I've been doing this for years now. At first I was insulted and ridiculed. Today the ridicule has markedly diminished.
Persuade first the choir, then the undecideds, that we need all the freedom to obtain our firepower right here at home, right in our home.
Let them ban whatever they would like....it won't matter...
There are only like 200 million semi automatic weapons out there right now....there isnt a chance in hell they would ever get them all....it would create a black market like we have never even seen before.
Since this witch is my rep, a call from me may have more weight. Of course, I won't use my screen name.
Because the vast majority of the R's are RINO's and part of the NWO along with the D's. There ain't a dime's worth of difference except in the presention.
Constitution Party next time.
The previous bill failed to pass muster in the Senate because of all the amendments.....people changed their votes to no at the urging of the NRA.
I think, even if Frist doesn't stop the riders from being attached, we will be fine. Enough Republicans would vote no that it would not pass if all the additions were made. That said, we should still contact Frist and tell him to make sure she doesn't add the rider.
Does he realize that the reason why they aren't used in crimes as much is that they are ILLEGAL? It doesn't mean we are any safer just because they are used in crimes less.
This stat only shows the decrease of assault weapons as a correlation to the ban, not a decrease in crime altogether due to it. So, how can he claim it makes us safer?
The criminals are just using pistols instead of assault weapons.
I am sure there have been several studies which showed so called "assault rifles" are used in so few crimes as to be statistically insignificant.
Any increase or decrease in their use in crime would be of such small numbers as to not be useful in a real scientific study.
Frist? Actually support conservatives? BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Why not mention one the very first, if not the first, Supreme Court Decision affirming the Second Amendment as an individual right - the Dred Scott decision?
There's nothing like strong convictions...
Oh come on now,let's have some hope.
Fairy tales can come true
They can happen to you
When your foe's not true
I'll try to finish this Limerick.
"What is a PATRIOT?"
PATRIOTS are not "Revolutionaries" trying to overthrow the government of the United States.
PATRIOTS are "Counter-Revolutionaries" trying to prevent the government of the United States from overthrowing the Constitution of the United States. - Unknown Author
Well it's separating the wheat from the chaff and the wolves from the sheep...time
God bless you and all your comrades in U.S. uniforms. Happy Fourth of July!!!!
That's an interesting analysis to explain a do-nothing except pork barrel Congress. Say a prayer that it backfires on the rats come Election Day. Happy Fourth of July!!!!
Happy Fourth of July to you too, neverdem. Yes, let's hope the gun issue bites the dems this time around too. Apparently the lesson Gore learned in 2000 is going to be lost on Kerry and the rest of the democrappers.
Happy Fourth of July!!!!
Agreed a 1 mile + range is a serious headache for body guards also the fact that there ain't concealed body armor that will stop a .50 BMG has gotta make the crooked politicians just a little nervous . Even if they are in a armored limo too.
Actually you can buy a semi auto version of the AK-47 for less than $400.00 with pre-ban standard capacity magazines.
The reason they are rarely used in crimes is that they are hard to carry concealed, are extremely loud without hearing protection,akward to use in confined spaces(inside a car), weigh 7-10 lbs.
Or in real simple terms they are to much of a hassle & were used in only 2% of crimes before the ban & even less now not because of the ban, but simply due the fact that they are akward for the punks to use.
No more banning of guns. We've had too many banned already! How about banning liberals?
I'm convinced there is a core of liberals in our country who are actively working to destroy it so they can put in a dictatorship and one of the ways they will get that power will be to first disarm all of us.
yes convictions are a heavy burdon when voting for someone who steps on them.
You assume that the Republicans really see themselves as engaged in opposing the Democrats, rather than having the job of maintaining a fiction that there is actually an opposing political party while making sure that no Dem initiative is ever rolled back
"Five or more people killed in a shooting at Kansas meatpacking plant, police say"
Got a link? Thanks.
Look in Websters, and next to the definition of "Elitist, limousine liberal hypocrite," is Di-Fi's picture.
Better not to ban them? Why go through the hassle of a black market if you don't have to?
Thanks for your response. I expect that the USA is going to become more civilized and polite as more and more Americans obtain their CHL's even though they do not believe the Government had the power to ban carry in the first place.
In the cases where the State denies the applicant a CHL for some reason, the "OHIO CARRY" option is still available in Ohio and, quite frankly, I frequently "Open Carry" in support of them even though I have my CHL. Plus, in order to comply with Ohio's Law, I need to "OPEN CARRY" when riding my Motorcycle! (Does the Uncle Remus Story about B'rer Rabbit and the Briar patch come to mind?)
I was watching the movie The Majestic (with Jim Carrey) yesterday and there was one part that really caught me. The lawyer (I think) for Carrey's character told him that the Constitution is a contract with the American people and that like all contracts is open to renegotiation. Seems that a lot of people believe that whether by choice or because it was ingrained into them. What we need is more people like Carrey's character, that are willing to stand up no matter what the possible reprucussions and state that the Constitution is a contract that is not open to renegotiation.
Thats funny, a constitution is supposed to be superior to a "contract" just like a constitutional amendment trumps a mere law.
Odd how VT is the only state where there is no need for a permit to carry a gun.
Last I heard Alaska was working on this also.
VT came about in the early 1900's pretty much like the "OHIO CARRY" came about in 2003. Not through the Legislature and the Governor signing a bill into law, but by a Supreme Court Ruling from the early 1900's that effectively said people in VT have the right carry guns wherever they wanted as long as they do not intend to use them in the commission of a crime. If you rob a gas station with a gun in VT, you get charged with robbery plus illegal possession of a firearm.
Ohio's Supreme court got too loose with their pen in writing their decision in Klein v. Leis (25-SEPT-2003). They were trying to have their cake and eat it too by saying that it is illegal to carry concealed guns, thinking that people would never even want to openly carry. They effectively declared the right to Open Carry a firearm is a Basic Fundamental Right in Ohio. While many considered this to be a set-back for the efforts to reclaim the right to Concealed Carry in Ohio, I personally started touting this as a GREAT VICTORY!
The Ohio Supreme Court had Pronounced that citizens of Ohio could Openly Carry Firearms as a Basic Fundamental Right with no need for Training, Licenses, Fees, regulations, limits, etc. This ruling and our reaction were undoubtedly instrumental in the Legislature and Governor passing and signing the new CHL law.
The "Open Carry" option is still available to anyone who is denied a CHL due to some stupid reason such as a 25 year old drug possession conviction, etc. While not able to carry in a car, they could follow the "Ohio Carry" procedures which we carefully spelled out to assure that they will be able to possess and carry firearms for their self defense and security.
ALASKA: Alaska, I believe, just declared by Law that everybody can carry "VT Style" PLUS they began issuing Licenses to qualified applicants which gave then Alaska Citizens the ability to be recognized in other states or to qualify for Non-Resident Licenses in other States, something that has been a problem for the citizens of VT.
Thanks for the further education!
I'm with you, but I guess what I said is more indicative of the result of such idiocy by the Dim-o-craps
Looks like the Communist from California, Diane Feinstein, isn't going to let up one iota on eroding our American inalienable rights that are GUARANTEED in the U.S. Constitution which SHE took an oath to uphold!
A large core of the Republican Party was highjacked several years ago by left-wingers, (progressives,liberals, communists, Trotskyites, etc.), when the Republicans took over both Houses in '94. They like to refer to themselves as "moderates" or Neo-Cons, but they seem to vote more with liberal Democrats than true Conservatives. It's best we concentrate more on educating our fellow citizens and neighbors on OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS that are ETCHED IN STONE. I don't care what Bills may come before Congress or what "opinion" the Supreme Court may render, I will NOT abide by it, period.
Absolutely right about the Left Wingers of the Republican Party. In Ohio, we finally got rid of Democrat Senator Metzenbaum and Senator Glenn, only to get 2 RINO's in Senator DeWine And Senator Voinovich.
But, in the past 20 years, the new technology boom has toppled the Soviet Union from within by FAX communications, The Chinese Government is under attack from within due to the Cellular Phone Text Messaging, and the Truth about Guns is being regularly spread over the Internet in Gun Grabbing countries like England, Australia, and Canada. Life is Good and the wider spread use of the Internet is going to make it better.
The USA needs to be run by "We the People" and not by the Liberal Politicians who want to take away our guns.
Free Republic Rocks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.