Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/21/2004 9:25:10 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Remember_Salamis

So why didn't they call the DC police?


99 posted on 07/21/2004 10:09:47 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Privatizating environmental regulation is critical to national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
Berger, his attorney Lanny Breuer said, checked his office and realized for the first time that he had walked out -- unintentionally, he says -- with important papers relating to the Clinton administration's efforts to combat terrorism.

They take us for fools don't they?

The spin, including from Dan Rathernot, and Katie the Cutie that the timing of the release of this information is the crime is beyond reprehensible. There is EVIL among us.

106 posted on 07/21/2004 10:13:38 PM PDT by ladyinred (What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about? Become a monthly donor and find out!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis


Things that make you go hmmm....

109 posted on 07/21/2004 10:14:45 PM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

They need to put hidden cameras in all National Archive reading rooms, after this debacle.


113 posted on 07/21/2004 10:16:12 PM PDT by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
this sounds bad. so, maybe dick clarke told the clintonistas that certain of the millenium review documents would be damaging to the former president, and sandy boy was the lamb sent in to review them to find out what they said for sure, and maybe retrieve the things. anyway, with the bastion of leftist journalism, the washington post, involved to this degree, perhaps there's blood in the water.

if nothing else, it certainly knocks kerry off the top of the news . . . HEY, now that I think about it, that's probably good for him. everytime he opens his mouth, he drops three points in the polls.

123 posted on 07/21/2004 10:20:06 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

Daschle To Demand Probe of Berger Missing Documents



Soon-to-be-former Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) today demanded a Senate investigation into the disappearance of highly classified documents from the National Archives. Daschle, speaking from his Senate office, said "I am troubled, very troubled, really really troubled by this event." He continued "the notion that Sandy Berger, an honorable former government employee, sightseeing at the Archives with his grandchildren, could have a cascade of paper files accidently fall on him and into his sock and jock shows just how much the Bush tax cuts have endangered our infrastructure." Given the number of documents reported to have penetrated Berger's clothing, Daschle expressed surprise that he did not die from a thousand paper cuts.

In a related development, New York Senator Hillary Clinton today asked for an FBI investigation after numerous marked up pages from the National Archives records mysteriously showed up in a box on a coffee table in her Chappaqua residence. "I thought we had fixed that problem when we ditched the White House maid years ago!" said Clinton.


130 posted on 07/21/2004 10:23:12 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
Did Kerry know? Check out the video interview with Brokaw at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619

Brokaw asks Kerry if he knew about the investigation of Berger, and twice Kerry says he had no clue. Did you know? No clue. Berger didn't tell you? No clue.

It must be very hard for Kerry to proclaim himself clueless on anything. Makes you wonder if the alternative was just too horrible and too risky.

I think he knew and he benefitted from Berger's paper shuffling. Otherwise there'd be no need to distance himself so thoroughly, to claim ignorance of the sort of thing he couldn't possibly have been ignorant about.

165 posted on 07/21/2004 10:37:42 PM PDT by Graymatter (Kerry medical records are none of our business---and his veep pick is, who???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
A Grand Jury in place, an investigation that has been ongoing this long and the fact that Berger has yet to be officially questioned indicate the investigation of a conspiracy.

With all of the expanded powers put in place by the Patriot Act the FBI must have put taps on Berger's phones, computers, etc.

171 posted on 07/21/2004 10:39:57 PM PDT by NCnodeLOGICBOMB (Noise is a byproduct of inefficiency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

....A government official with knowledge of the investigation said Archives employees took action promptly after noticing a missing document in September. This official said an Archives employee called former White House deputy counsel Bruce Lindsey, who is former president Bill Clinton's liaison to the National Archives. The Archives employee said documents were missing and would have to be returned....

I wonder what the written procedure is for employees when documents are found to be missing, I doubt it involves contacting the person and asking for them back...Would they do the same for you me or any Republican?


172 posted on 07/21/2004 10:40:00 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

As important and potentially damning as this story is to the Clintonistas, I will almost guarantee that the Dems will close ranks on this, and the story will sputter out like the end of one of Billy Jeff's cigardildos.

The media will cover for Berger the Burglar, and the handwritten notes on the Millenium Memo will go the way of Hillary's Rose Law firm billing records.

No one cares except those who care about the future of our Republic. This effectively precludes all Democrats and their whorehounds in the media....


197 posted on 07/21/2004 10:53:00 PM PDT by freebilly (Vote Kerry-- A billion Muslims can't be wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

Man alive, these guys and gals had to have REAL non-gender-specific reproductive organs of brass to set this up. Can you imagine the possible damage to career, not to mention the risk of arkancide, that these people are taking?

These people are real heroes, in my book. I doubt any of them are even conservative - but in my mind, they are still patriots. Their job was to protect those documents, and they did their job. But archivists against the most powerful figures in politics? They need protection, and support for what may lie ahead for them...


198 posted on 07/21/2004 10:53:03 PM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
If anyone wonders why we are talking about 3,000 innocent murdered today when Bill Clinton and his gang were in charge here is one reason. Take a look at who was "helping" Clinton with NATIONAL SECURITY (he was on with Dan Abrams tonight trying to tell us that Sandy Berger stealing documents was NO BIG DEAL). Listed as a "policy advisor" to the Clinton Administration. NEVER AGAIN do we turn this country over to a bunch of "buddies" of immoral RATS.

******

Ten and a half years ago just before Sean Maloney was to depart for Little Rock Arkansas, to serve as deputy director of advance scheduling for Bill Clinton’s ’92 presidential campaign, he decided to go clubbing. In an inspired moment of fate, he met his partner Randy Florke on the dance floor of the New York nightclub Roxy. At the time, Randy was working for an interior decorator and architect in upstate New York, building a real estate and design career. Their story, and the way they brought light into the live of three children who needed a family, is a testament to perseverance and dedication and offers living proof that gay men make incredible parents.

206 posted on 07/21/2004 10:56:59 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
"but I think he also feels a sense of injustice that after building a reputation as a tireless defender of his country that many Republicans would try to assassinate his character to pursue their own ends."

What a typical democrat elitist statement. No acknowledgment of the fact that Berger ruined his own reputation by his own actions - but points blame at Republicans because they "dare" to mention it in public.

What idiots would want to vote for such people that consider themselves above the law. The law is deemed only for the little people (that vote) and all conservatives - not the leadership of the democrat party. So - they are a bunch of crooks - pure and simple and definitely unworthy of being handed our country to lead.

211 posted on 07/21/2004 11:03:00 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - It's just not safe to vote Democrat.-a bunch of crooks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

ping


237 posted on 07/21/2004 11:29:39 PM PDT by Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
'He took 'lots of bathroom breaks'...

Sounds like our MAD and LOONIE ex-VP AL GORE after all that iced tea (I was out of the room.).

253 posted on 07/22/2004 1:09:47 AM PDT by beyond the sea (There's always one to turn and walk away ........ and one who just wants to stay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis

If the staff saw him stealing papers, why didn't they stop him? That is a good question that was asked on O'Reilly last night.

It will soon become a very common question from the Dem attack machine, so we'd better come up with a good answer.


266 posted on 07/22/2004 2:35:03 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NCjim

Mark for later...


268 posted on 07/22/2004 3:36:34 AM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
"...This official said an Archives employee called former White House deputy counsel Bruce Lindsey, who is former president Bill Clinton's liaison to the National Archives...."

Policy and procedure question:
Is it the norm [for NARA] to call an attorney first when something is missing? Why would they not call Berger? Bruce Lindsey may be the Clinton point man, but Berger took the documents, not bubba.

"....They devised a coding system and marked the documents they knew Berger was interested in canvassing, and watched him carefully...."

A coding system takes a little planning. Call a spade a spade. It was a sting operation. Would this have been done on their own initative or at the behest of the FBI?

Previous reports had him reviewing the docs for the Clinton administration to prepare for testimony before the commission. This article states Berger was reviewing docs for the Bush administration to determine what should be declassified for the 9/11 panel. If that was the case, why would they not call White House Counsel instead of Bruce Lindsey? Any significance?

I am somewhat surprised to find this article in the Washington Post. No apologies, no excuses, no "much ado about nothing" spin. Does this mean the story really does have legs?

Lastly, is Berger one to "fall on his sword" for anyone? If, as has been reported he is cooperating, does anyone have an educated guess as to whether or not he is naming names?

279 posted on 07/22/2004 4:23:07 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
Has Berger been arrested yet? No!

Has the DOJ issued an indictment yet? No!

How much time has elapsed since Berger is allegedly to have stolen classified materials? 9, nearly 10 months!

It is pathetic that the law has to be enforced by the media and congressional committees and not the DOJ as intended?

288 posted on 07/22/2004 5:09:07 AM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remember_Salamis
Archives Staff Was Suspicious of Berger, and didn' say a F'ing thing.
291 posted on 07/22/2004 5:23:04 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Flush the john/john rat ticket in 2004. #1 & #4 liberals in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson