Kerry and Pot

ABC Morning News | 7-27-2004 | me

[Reagan Man]

You present no hard evidence, just libelous remarks about PresBush and ad hominem responses. A sure sign of desperation. I warned you. Told you to STFU but you wouldn't listen and now you've made yourself look like a first class fool. All I can say is, carry on.

[weegee]

True LSD was legal in the early 1960s, this isn't about "criminality". The President was incapacitated for hours at a time when he was under the influence. Highly irresponsible for the leader of this nation (as the Cuban missile crisis showed us).

[sakic]

Your inability to deal with my questions and statements offers proof that you stand against common sense and decency and operate solely on partisan lines.

The undeniable proof is in the fact that if we change the name "Bush" to "Kerry" or "Clinton" in these statements your opinion of it all would no doubt change.

Translated:

That makes you a piece of irrelevant garbage who stands for nothing. Tell me you would react differently to all of this if it was Clinton or Kerry or prove that you are a lying piece of human waste product.

[Reagan Man]

More ad hominem responses. Why am I not surprised. Par for the course.

[sakic]

Coming fron a fellow who initially responded to the topic at hand with STFU twice makes your vapid non-responses even more bizarre. Or perhaps that is all you are capable of?

I have a feeling that my previous sentence should not include a question mark but I'm feeling generous today.

[sakic]

Just for fun and to make you look stupid again I'll ask again:

If the statements by Bush had been uttered by Kerry would your responses be the same?

I confess that I do get a kick out of your inabilty to respond, although it also makes me feel bad because it is kind of like poking a caged animal, I suppose.