Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

14% Follow Advice On Breast-Feeding
The Washington Post ^ | August 6, 2004 | -- From News Services

Posted on 08/05/2004 10:53:05 PM PDT by neverdem

FINDINGS

Fourteen percent of American mothers exclusively breast-feed their babies for the recommended minimum of six months, according to government data released yesterday.

New state-by-state statistics show that Oregon has the highest rate of mothers meeting the minimum standard, but even there just 25 percent are able to give their babies breast milk and nothing else for six months, the report shows.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, the World Health Organization and most other experts recommend that mothers give their babies breast milk only -- no formula, juice or solid food -- until they are 6 months old.

Studies have shown that when babies are exclusively breast-fed for the first six months of life they grow better without getting too fat, are less likely to develop infections and may keep those benefits through childhood.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: breastfeeding; caraccidents; elnino
After mentioning that breast feeding should go up to age 2 if possible, and that kids should suckle for at least 1 year, motor vehicle accidents caused by animals and the periodic climate phenomena called el nino were discussed.
1 posted on 08/05/2004 10:53:05 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/05/2004 10:53:45 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What? No pictures?


3 posted on 08/05/2004 10:55:15 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yeah, but boiling the nipples is a real drag...


4 posted on 08/05/2004 10:55:32 PM PDT by null and void (Who crys for the krill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I breast fed both my boys. The oldest was a big baby and I made the addition of ceral and such at 2.5 months with the approval of his doctor. He was breast fed until 10 months. The youngest got nothing but breast milk until 6 months at which time adult table food was added. He refused to eat baby food. I continued to breast feed him until about 1.5 years. Both boys are healthy and rarely sick. When they do get sick it is minor. I was lucky in that I didn't work at the time. It was very difficult financially. I think work is the main reason many women do not breast feed.


5 posted on 08/05/2004 11:22:57 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; neverdem
" I think work is the main reason many women do not breast feed."

There is a HUGE stigma placed on breastfeeding in public spaces. A good question is where to breast feed outside of the home? Many changes in pediatrics since the '70's for sure. We need to support mothers who take the best choice for their babies! My wife breastfed our son for a year and he's QUITE healthy! (10lbs, 3oz - 3/15/03)

As a side note: The magazine Working Mother is a joke, more like CEO Woman With No Time For Being A Mom. Also, my wife just finished the book The Nanny Diaries, and it is sad to see inside track on how the rich "outsource" mothering.

6 posted on 08/06/2004 12:11:21 AM PDT by endthematrix (Go balloons. Go balloons. Go balloons, balloons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
At least some percentage of women are simply unable to breastfeed, work or no.
7 posted on 08/06/2004 4:34:09 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
At least some percentage of women are simply unable to breastfeed, work or no.

And the reason for this is. . . ?

8 posted on 08/06/2004 4:50:11 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: toddst
At least some percentage of women are simply unable to breastfeed, work or no.

And the reason for this is. . . ?

My wife was unable to produce adequately to feed our twins. Since they were hospitalized for 12 weeks due to prematurity, we thought the decreased production may have been due to being forced to use a breastpump. We thought that if the boys were able to suckle directly, it might improve. Unfortunately, our next child proved this not to be the case. Even with the singleton, she was unable to produce a significant amount beyond the first week or so, once his demands started to increase.

9 posted on 08/06/2004 5:01:33 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix; atomicpossum; neverdem; cyborg; Paleo Conservative
C'mon!

You're telling me that you wouldn't entrust the lives of your children to the care of a flaky, potentially homicidal, British au pair?

Control freak.

10 posted on 08/06/2004 5:05:45 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
My wife was unable to produce adequately . . .

Thanks for your thorough answer to my question.

11 posted on 08/06/2004 5:06:55 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It's friday and you said breast.


12 posted on 08/06/2004 5:08:13 AM PDT by biblewonk (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid
You're telling me that you wouldn't entrust the lives of your children to the care of a flaky, potentially homicidal, British au pair?


Yes.

No.

13 posted on 08/06/2004 5:16:40 AM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Touche!
14 posted on 08/06/2004 5:18:19 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: null and void
Re your "Yeah, but boiling the nipples is a real drag... ">

Gad! Doesn't that hurt?

16 posted on 08/06/2004 5:24:20 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2
That's all well and good.

But who are Stephen J. Fry and Leila supporting?(!)

17 posted on 08/06/2004 5:25:44 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

Yes, but are the effects achieved because these mothers are willing to care just a little bit more and would be attentive in other areas of the child's life as they grow up, or are the results achieved because mother's milk is more healthy OR because of.....


18 posted on 08/06/2004 5:32:58 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid
Well, Fry says he's not going to vote...

But as soon as I get finished whipping Kirk's hinney,

I'm taking Fry to the woodshed...

BTW

all future scientists are voting for W. One, he is the best choice and two, we already know he won!

---------------------------------------

"Leela really kicked your ass, didn't she, Captain?"

"Shut up, you little Russian troll!"

19 posted on 08/06/2004 5:37:22 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2; bentfeather; Darksheare; King Prout; Xenalyte
SCIENTISTS OF THE FUTURE, UNITE!

Jonas Salk's head:

I agree. Though, it's kind of difficult to invent new vaccines when you're only a head. I may be a genius, but come on. INVENT ME A FRIGGIN' TORSO ALREADY!

20 posted on 08/06/2004 5:49:38 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: toddst

My mom was unable. Sometimes it's not about making a choice but rather a physical inability to produce milk.


21 posted on 08/06/2004 5:53:14 AM PDT by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: toddst

Breast milk production is a result of the action of certain hormones within the body, particularly prolactin. If the mother's hormone levels are not sufficient to milk production, then she will not be able to breast feed. It is possible for a woman to be unable to breast feed, regardless of her intention.


22 posted on 08/06/2004 7:01:14 AM PDT by AQGeiger (Have you hugged your soldier today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cjshapi; AQGeiger

Thank you both for your responses. I am now much better informed. From what I have seen, breast-fed children are generally very healthy.


23 posted on 08/06/2004 7:07:45 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Studies have shown that when babies are exclusively breast-fed for the first six months of life they grow better without getting too fat, are less likely to develop infections and may keep those benefits through childhood.

What studies? Has anyone ever seen those studies? I haven't and I've looked for them.

What organization out there is paying the cost of a legitimate, scientific study that monitors the health of breast-fed and non-breast-fed children throughout childhood? Think about it. That would be a very large and difficult undertaking. Do you know anyone who has every participated in such a study? I thought not.

I have a friend who is a pediatrician and who works in research at a large university. She is an advocate of breast feeding and is always referring to the "studies". I asked her one day to show me the studies. She sent me some referrences to governmental studies that she claimed supported the claims of the breast feeding advocates. But upon close examination, those studies did nothing of the kind.

I'm not saying that breast feeding is not worthwhile. My wife just finished breast feeding our youngest daughter at age 3-1/2. However, I do think that breast feeding's benefits are way over-hyped. Our 3-1/2 year old had her share of the common childhood illnesses. Breast feeding didn't seem to provide her with the supposed benefits.

Mother's who don't breast feed shouldn't be made to feel that they've let their children down. I think the evidence is clearly out on that.

24 posted on 08/06/2004 7:18:45 AM PDT by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the World Health Organization and most other experts recommend that mothers give their babies breast milk only -- no formula, juice or solid food -- until they are 6 months old.

With our first, the doc said 4 months, we made it three until breast milk just wasn't cutting it. My wife was making enough, but a bellyful of milk just didn't hold her over for very long.

For the second, the doc said 6 months and we said yeah, whatever doc. She was eating table food by six months, having little use for baby food.

Every one is different and it is best to give them what works, not what some committee of academics pulls out of their posteriors.

25 posted on 08/06/2004 7:35:38 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
or are the results achieved because mother's milk is more healthy OR because of.....

I understand your point and think that may play a roll but the studies that have come out on breast milk show that it contains more of the essential proteins and immune protections than can be achieved artificially. This said I would not think badly of any woman who chose another route, it's just better to breast feed if you are able.

26 posted on 08/06/2004 8:19:08 AM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Every one is different and it is best to give them what works, not what some committee of academics pulls out of their posteriors.

And when the gov't enforces what the academics pull, what then???

27 posted on 08/06/2004 8:20:47 AM PDT by null and void (Who crys for the krill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
There is a HUGE stigma placed on breastfeeding in public spaces.

This is true although I breast fed in public and never received any of the dirty looks or comments etc that you hear about. But then I was discreet. Most of the time it was at a booth in the local eatery. Feed the baby and he was quiet through our meal.

28 posted on 08/06/2004 8:22:07 AM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rum Tum Tugger
Here's a bunch of studies. The links ought to work. If you can think of a better search strategy, then by all means, go for it. The algorithm that I used was "breast feeding AND childhood (morbidity OR mortality)".

NCBI PubMed NLM PubMed
Entrez PubMed Nucleotide Protein Genome Structure OMIM PMC Journals Books
 Search for
     
spacer gif About Entrez

Text Version

Entrez PubMed
Overview
Help | FAQ
Tutorial
New/Noteworthy
E-Utilities

PubMed Services
Journals Database
MeSH Database
Single Citation Matcher
Batch Citation Matcher
Clinical Queries
LinkOut
Cubby

Related Resources
Order Documents
NLM Gateway
TOXNET
Consumer Health
Clinical Alerts
ClinicalTrials.gov
PubMed Central


 Show: 
Items 1-20 of 380
 
 of 19
  
1: Tripathy AK, Mishra L, Bakhshi S, Arya LS. Related Articles,
Free Full Text Breast feeding and childhood hematological malignancy.
Indian J Pediatr. 2004 May;71(5):417-8. Review.
PMID: 15163870 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2: Mahe A, Meertens L, Ly F, Sow PS, Diop CT, Samb ND, Diop OM, Valensi F, Gessain A. Related Articles,
Abstract Human T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma virus type 1-associated infective dermatitis in Africa: a report of five cases from Senegal.
Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):958-65.
PMID: 15149509 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt RW, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Collet JP, Shapiro S, Chalmers B, Hodnett E, Vanilovich I, Mezen I, Ducruet T, Shishko G, Bogdanovich N. Related Articles,
Abstract Does previous infection protect against atopic eczema and recurrent wheeze in infancy?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 May;34(5):753-6.
PMID: 15144467 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Taylor DR, Greene JM, Cowan JO, Flannery EM, Herbison GP, McLachlan CR, Poulton R, Sears MR. Related Articles,
Abstract Relationship between socioeconomic status and asthma: a longitudinal cohort study.
Thorax. 2004 May;59(5):376-80.
PMID: 15115861 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: Menegaux F, Olshan AF, Neglia JP, Pollock BH, Bondy ML. Related Articles,
Abstract Day care, childhood infections, and risk of neuroblastoma.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 May 1;159(9):843-51.
PMID: 15105177 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6: Bray KK, Branson BG, Williams K. Related Articles,
Abstract Early childhood caries in an urban health department: an exploratory study.
J Dent Hyg. 2003 Fall;77(4):225-32.
PMID: 15022522 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7: Mavale-Manuel S, Alexandre F, Duarte N, Albuquerque O, Scheinmann P, Poisson-Salomon AS, de Blic J. Related Articles,
Abstract Risk factors for asthma among children in Maputo (Mozambique).
Allergy. 2004 Apr;59(4):388-93.
PMID: 15005761 [PubMed - in process]
8: King NM, Wu II, Tsai JS. Related Articles,
Abstract Caries prevalence and distribution, and oral health habits of zero- to four-year-old children in Macau, China.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec;70(3):243-9.
PMID: 14998209 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9: Plate DK, Strassmann BI, Wilson ML. Related Articles,
Abstract Water sources are associated with childhood diarrhoea prevalence in rural east-central Mali.
Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Mar;9(3):416-25.
PMID: 14996372 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10: Martin RM, Ness AR, Gunnell D, Emmett P, Davey Smith G; ALSPAC Study Team. Related Articles,
Abstract Does breast-feeding in infancy lower blood pressure in childhood? The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).
Circulation. 2004 Mar 16;109(10):1259-66. Epub 2004 Mar 01.
PMID: 14993142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11: Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A. Related Articles,
Abstract Associations of birth weight and length, childhood size, and smoking with bone fractures during growth: evidence from a birth cohort study.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Feb 15;159(4):343-50.
PMID: 14769637 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12: Kurugol Z, Geylani S, Karaca Y, Umay F, Erensoy S, Vardar F, Bak M, Yaprak I, Ozkinay F, Ozkinay C. Related Articles,
Abstract Rotavirus gastroenteritis among children under five years of age in Izmir, Turkey.
Turk J Pediatr. 2003 Oct-Dec;45(4):290-4.
PMID: 14768791 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13: Jose B, King NM. Related Articles,
Abstract Early childhood caries lesions in preschool children in Kerala, India.
Pediatr Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;25(6):594-600.
PMID: 14733478 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14: Jourdan-Da Silva N, Perel Y, Mechinaud F, Plouvier E, Gandemer V, Lutz P, Vannier JP, Lamagnere JL, Margueritte G, Boutard P, Robert A, Armari C, Munzer M, Millot F, De Lumley L, Berthou C, Rialland X, Pautard B, Hemon D, Clavel J. Related Articles,
Abstract Infectious diseases in the first year of life, perinatal characteristics and childhood acute leukaemia.
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 12;90(1):139-45.
PMID: 14710221 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15: Olmez S, Uzamis M, Erdem G. Related Articles,
Abstract Association between early childhood caries and clinical, microbiological, oral hygiene and dietary variables in rural Turkish children.
Turk J Pediatr. 2003 Jul-Sep;45(3):231-6.
PMID: 14696801 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16: Dubois L, Girard M. Related Articles,
Abstract Social inequalities in infant feeding during the first year of life. The Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Quebec (LSCDQ 1998-2002).
Public Health Nutr. 2003 Dec;6(8):773-83.
PMID: 14641948 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17: Neutzling MB, Taddei JA, Gigante DP. Related Articles,
Abstract Risk factors of obesity among Brazilian adolescents: a case-control study.
Public Health Nutr. 2003 Dec;6(8):743-9.
PMID: 14641944 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18: Mash D, Aschenaki K, Kedamo T, Walternsperger K, Gebreyes K, Pasha O, Manoncourt S. Related Articles,
Abstract Community and facility surveys illuminate the pathway to child survival in Liben Woreda, Ethiopia.
East Afr Med J. 2003 Sep;80(9):463-9.
PMID: 14640167 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19: Hallett KB, O'Rourke PK. Related Articles,
Abstract Social and behavioural determinants of early childhood caries.
Aust Dent J. 2003 Mar;48(1):27-33.
PMID: 14640154 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20: da Costa Lima R, Victora CG, Menezes AM, Barros FC. Related Articles,
Abstract Do risk factors for childhood infections and malnutrition protect against asthma? A study of Brazilian male adolescents.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Nov;93(11):1858-64.
PMID: 14600053 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Items 1-20 of 380
 
 of 19
  
 Show: 
     
   
 

29 posted on 08/06/2004 8:35:17 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal; farmfriend
This said I would not think badly of any woman who chose another route, it's just better to breast feed if you are able.

I couldn't have said it any better.

30 posted on 08/06/2004 8:41:12 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xzins

In the long run, "If momma ain't happy, ain't nobody happy!"

I breastfed each of mine for 2 years, one has increased blood pressure and they both show signs of glucose intolerance that's the early sign of diabetes.

Nevertheless:



: Lancet. 2001 Feb 10;357(9254):413-9. Related Articles, Links


Comment in:
Lancet. 2001 Feb 10;357(9254):406-7.
Lancet. 2001 Jun 9;357(9271):1880-1.
Lancet. 2001 Jun 9;357(9271):1880; author reply 1881.
Lancet. 2001 Jun 9;357(9271):1881.

Early nutrition in preterm infants and later blood pressure: two cohorts after randomised trials.

Singhal A, Cole TJ, Lucas A.

Medical Research Council Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London, UK. a.singhal@ich.ucl.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: Despite data relating body size in early life to later cardiovascular outcomes, the hypothesis that nutrition affects such outcomes has not been established. Breastfeeding has been associated with lower blood pressure in later life, but previous studies have not controlled for possible confounding factors by using a randomised design with prospective follow-up. We undertook such a study to test the hypothesis that early diet programmes blood pressure in later life in children randomly assigned different diets at birth. METHODS: Blood pressure was measured at age 13-16 years in 216 (23%) of a cohort of 926 children who were born prematurely and had participated at birth in two parallel randomised trials in five neonatal units in the UK. Dietary interventions were: donated banked breastmilk versus preterm formula and standard term formula versus preterm formula. FINDINGS: Children followed up at age 13-16 years were similar to those not followed up in terms of social class and anthropometry at birth. Mean arterial blood pressure at age 13-16 years was lower in the 66 children assigned banked breastmilk (alone or in addition to mother's milk) than in the 64 assigned preterm formula (mean 81.9 [SD 7.8] vs 86.1 [6.5] mm Hg; 95% CI for difference -6.6 to -1.6; p=0.001). In non-randomised analyses, the proportion of enteral intake as human milk in the neonatal period was inversely related to later mean arterial pressure (beta=-0.3 mm Hg per 10% increase [95% CI -0.5 to -0.1]; p=0.006). No differences were found in the term formula (n=44) versus preterm formula (n=42) comparison. INTERPRETATION: Breastmilk consumption was associated with lower later blood pressure in children born prematurely. Our data provide experimental evidence of programming of a cardiovascular risk factor by early diet and further support the long-term beneficial effects of breastmilk.

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial


31 posted on 08/06/2004 11:31:34 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rum Tum Tugger

Take a look at my last post


32 posted on 08/06/2004 11:33:05 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
children randomly assigned different diets at birth

Given true randomness, size of sample, and strength of effect, then that should indicate that breast-feeding is beneficial.

33 posted on 08/06/2004 11:55:57 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
You want pictures of my healthy breastfed babies?


34 posted on 08/06/2004 12:02:20 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
For the second, the doc said 6 months and we said yeah, whatever doc. She was eating table food by six months, having little use for baby food.

I breastfed my oldest for roughly 6 months, not exclusively. He had lots of trouble with allergies, sensitivity, ear infections, etc. Because of the allergies, in particular, I chose to breastfeed my second child exclusively for 6 months (allergies are very common in both my husband's and my family ).

My second child is now 6, and is just now showing signs of spring allergies. He had his first ear infection at 2, and that was the first sick visit of his life.

I don't KNOW that breastfeeding had anything to do with it. I would recommend it for people with strong history of allergy. It certainly won't hurt, and it might help.

35 posted on 08/06/2004 12:47:08 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson