Skip to comments.Americans in danger are vulnerable to dictatorship (Barf Alert)
Posted on 09/12/2004 4:15:16 PM PDT by Popman
TALLAHASSEE - A thousand dead in Iraq. For what? History's highest budget deficit. For what? George W. Bush has been so reckless with America's lives, wealth and reputation and so stupendously incompetent and untrustworthy overall as to defy belief that anyone but Halliburton and the House of Saud would want him to be elected.
And yet, if the polls are accurate, Bush is leading. Dismal as that news may be, what's more to be feared is the reason. Though they see through him in nearly every other respect, many people are convinced of his leadership, his courage, his sense of resolve.
This triumph for the art of propaganda - all we really know about his courage, after all, is how little of it he displayed during Vietnam - signifies mortal danger for American democracy.
The "man on horseback" mentality, the belief that a leader's strength is more important than where it leads them, defines a population that is vulnerable to dictatorship.
This is not to call Bush a dictator or suggest that he wants to be one. But let no one believe that it couldn't happen here, as has happened so often elsewhere.
It has happened here, and by the design of better statesmen than Bush.
John Adams, an original American patriot, signed the Alien and Sedition Acts that put people in prison for what they said or wrote.
Abraham Lincoln, one of our three greatest presidents, suspended the writ of habeas corpus.
Woodrow Wilson, a scholar by profession, jailed and deported people for opposing a war that, nearly a century later, still raises the question of what American interests compelled our participation.
Franklin D. Roosevelt put 110,000 men, women and children in concentration camps because of their race.
In each instance, danger was the pretext for suspending democracy and decency.
Dictatorship has struck even in the absence of danger. Right here, in Florida.
In December 2000, the Florida House of Representatives, in broad daylight, voted 79 to 41 to steal the 2000 presidential election by formally appointing the Republican slate of electors regardless of what a recount might show. Though presumptively legal under the Constitution, that was a dictatorial act in light of the modern expectation that the people, not the politicians, elect the president.
Florida rewarded the perpetrators by sending Tom Feeney to Congress and re-electing nearly everyone who followed his orders. If that disgraceful vote ever became even an issue in any of their campaigns, I am unaware of it.
The Senate did not follow suit, but only because of President John McKay's shrewd strategy of waiting to see what the Supreme Court would do. Nonetheless, a precedent was set for use in the next state where one party controls both houses and opportunity knocks.
Meanwhile, it is becoming clear that the great falsehoods of this administration were not limited to the phantom weapons of mass destruction, the fanciful link between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida, and (most recently) the phony Medicare drug benefit cost figures that were deliberately fed to the Congress.
To that list must be added the deception that the Republicans wanted Howard Dean for their opponent. The Washington punditry corps regurgitated that as fact and helped give the Republicans exactly what they did want: a senator (actually, two senators) on the opposition ticket.
It didn't matter who. Sitting members of Congress are sitting ducks because they come with the fresh baggage of complicated voting records that are easy to misconstrue and misrepresent.
The Homeland Security Act, for example, contained a poison pill for Democrats: Its labor-bashing component set up Max Cleland, a triple amputee Vietnam War hero, to be smeared as unpatriotic. If there is such a place as hell, surely it awaits the liars who did that.
In the entire history of the United States, there have been only four presidents who went straight from the Congress to the White House. The last of them - and the only Democrat - was John F. Kennedy, 44 years ago.
Former members of Congress have fared much better, but in recent years only by way of the vice presidency.
The Democrats should have learned by now. Of the six Democratic presidents directly elected since the Civil War, all but one (JFK) were governors: Grover Cleveland, Wilson, Roosevelt, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. (Michael Dukakis would have won too had he managed to show anger, or any other passion, at appropriate moments.) Truman and Lyndon Johnson would not have made the White House but for the vice presidency.
Governors, or former governors, have played well for the GOP too: e.g., Ronald Reagan, George Bush. A governor's record is rarely as complex as that of a member of Congress, and the job title itself conveys a sense of competence and authority.
Even if, as we see now, the competence is only an illusion.
If our leaders are dictators, wouldn't Mr. Dyckman's article land him in prison?
Has anyone else noticed that the leftwing nutcases seem to have more access to the media than normal people?
Yeah . . . he sets up an (almost) interesting premise and then fails to deliver.
This jackanapes consistently cites his own opinions as though they were facts. More evidence of lefty "intellect."
Who called Max Cleland unpatriotic? It seems only the Democrats affix this label to former Georgia Senator Max Cleland. Why are Democrats questioning Max Cleland's patriotism?
...because people who write nonsense like this are normally confined to a mental ward or admitted to the emergency room for swallowing copious amounts of dry kool-aid
Someone needs to change Dykman's diaper. Perhaps Al Gore is available.
When I read this article at lunch today, I scared the crap out of a nice lady sitting in the next table because I laughed out so loud.
Don't worry kerry will lose and give us 4 more years of grace ... after that ...
This is more, "Bush is a moron....why do the people laugh
when he out smarts us" bunk.
This guy's last name is all that needs to be said....what a Dyck!! :)
I thought it was Dyckhead and the above was a typo.
A "Barf Alert"? For this? For THIS??? This is one of the funniest items I have ever read! This piece is absolutely hilarious! Perhaps we need a "Split Your Sides Open in Laughter" alert...I know I can't stop the laughter!
It would be nice if he accused Bush of this gross incompetence with a little bit of actual facts besides "just because I said so"
...and this guy is an editor at the pager to boot....
I see another tin foil hat has come loose from Mr. Dyckman's noggin. Poor dear.
The quickest way to a dictatorship is when the politicians declare that the rules they pass for us to obey don't apply to our elected leaders. When politicians believe that they and their continued hold on power are more important than showing even a basic respect for the truth the rule of law and legal system. When current laws are ignored or changed after the fact. Look at Clinton deciding that he was too important to bother telling the truth. Al Gore getting the Florida courts to throw out the election law and creating new rules that would assist Gore in changing the election results.
Look how close Adolf Gore came to stealing the election. There maybe a point there.
Now that fact qualifies as a big time "BARF"!
Yeah, I'm also getting a little tired of this one. Cleland wasn't called unpatriotic by anybody, ever. He's just a sore loser who made up a goofy story to explain why he couldn't keep his seat. He was elected because he was a war hero; he was defeated because he was a crummy senator.
So Cynthia Mckinney had a more complicated job as congresswoman from Georgia than Jimmy Carter had as governor of Georgia. (Sorry, he DID run a state for a few years, after all.) I don't know what this guy is smoking but it can't be legal.
DYCKMAN is it? I am a legman myself.
He's smoking rolled up grape Kool-Aid.
I guess it's legal?
Martin Dyckman must be one of pat buchanan's drinking buddies...they seem to swill the same brand.
Our family continues to boycott the Communist Times and this is a perfect example why. As newspapers across the country wonder why their readership continues to decline, we'll just get our news from the Internet.
Obviously Mr. Dykeman doesn't approve of elected representives acting like dictators. He only approves of dictators in black robes.
DYCKMAN You are an Idiot deal with it.
>>Its labor-bashing component set up Max Cleland, a triple amputee Vietnam War hero, to be smeared as unpatriotic.<<
The whole purpose of the Homeland security act was to set Max Cleland up?
Is this guy really as stupid as this statement and "article" suggests?
C'mon. Fess up. You dipped this from the indymedia sewer, right?
I'm amazed at just how much that's been posted lately from the MSM reads like adolescent garbage from the imc's.
Thanks for the bump. You gotta wonder how these guys manage to avoid not getting caught while on the DNC payrole.
I'm betting Ivan is heading right to your doorstep.
These people are nuts.
At 150 MPH, there won't be a doorstep left!!!
Yes!! Absolutely!! Off with his head!!
(Oops. Sorry. Thirty years too early)
Though presumptively legal under the first amendment to the Constitution, Martin Dyckman's article is a piece of incoherent trash in light of the modern expectation that commentators exhibit even a modest shred of honesty and truthfulness in their writings.
This so funny...the Democrats who voted for them are absolved of responbility for who they nominated and somehow became puppets of the Republican party.
To your point: Obviously, if the GOP is cunning enough to deceive everybody and pull a bait and switch with Dean and Kerry, you would think they are cunning enough to pull off a dictatorship without anybody knowing it!!!