Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Int. Criminal Tribunal findings: George W. Bush guilty of war crimes(Is this Clown Court for real?)
Pravda ^ | 09/22/2004 | Michael Berglin

Posted on 09/22/2004 11:17:42 AM PDT by demlosers

In the final opinion of the court, Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, rules against Bush.

Citing: George Walker Bush, President of the United States and Commander -in-Chief of US military forces for serious crimes ; waging a war of aggression on Afghanistan, war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Afghan people, against prisoners of war ; and the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and around the region.

In a court action not seen since Nuremburg, 1946, the court issued its ruling in no uncertain terms that the US has used weapons of mass destruction, protracting an illegal military conflict, and crimes against humanity. Very serious allegations indeed.

The entire ruling can be found at:

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm.

Bush has never acknowledged this ruling, nor was the American people ever informed of it. Is the concealment an effort by Bush to keep the American people in the dark about what is really happening in the world?

In the final findings, the court said: "The Defendant [George Walker Bush] is a convicted war criminal consequently unfit to hold public office ; citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation from the Defendant and his government ; and in declining to obey illegal orders of the Defendant and his administration ;including military orders threatening other nations or the people of the United States on the basis of the Nuremberg Principle, that illegal orders of Superior must not be obeyed".

The court has also faulted the US for using weapons of mass destruction; something the US invaded Iraq for in an effort to halt the creation of WDMs. The UN inspectors have said that Iraq did not have WDMs, the US can show no evidence that Iraq even had WDMs.

The court has also introduced a new word into the vocabulary of court proceedings and that is: "omnicide" - in relationship to the US"s use of depleted uranium that retains it"s radioactive threat for approximately 4.5 billion years. Not only are the present victims of American hostilities directly suffering the after effects of radioactive poisoning, but future generations will suffer equally.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lefties; stupidjoke

1 posted on 09/22/2004 11:17:43 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers

I'm sure the Kerry Kamp will love this one.


2 posted on 09/22/2004 11:19:26 AM PDT by MisterRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

yawn


3 posted on 09/22/2004 11:19:57 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Soooooo....is this court going to send someone to arrest President Bush, and haul him before the court for sentencing? That would be interesting to watch.


4 posted on 09/22/2004 11:20:33 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Can I phone in an artillary strike?


5 posted on 09/22/2004 11:20:49 AM PDT by theDentist ("John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Proving once and for all that international institutions are the tools of brutal dictators and tyrants, and the enemy of the free world?


6 posted on 09/22/2004 11:21:12 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
My reaction:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA- *snort, choke, cough* -HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *Gasp gasp gasp*

Come on, does ANYone take these clowns seriously?

7 posted on 09/22/2004 11:21:26 AM PDT by Luircin (PROUD to be a member of Generation W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

What court?


8 posted on 09/22/2004 11:21:35 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

:::::BURP:::::: yea right.....


9 posted on 09/22/2004 11:21:44 AM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
This just in:

"Coalition of Chicago gangsters declares Elliot Ness to be guilty of harassment"

10 posted on 09/22/2004 11:21:51 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
I'm sure the Kerry Kamp will love this one

I wish they would run with it - more lead for their balloon.

11 posted on 09/22/2004 11:22:17 AM PDT by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction

Doesnt depleted mean that it is no longer radioactive?
12 posted on 09/22/2004 11:23:05 AM PDT by Spackidagoosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
...and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise...

So now they're the ultimate arbiter of our constitution?

13 posted on 09/22/2004 11:23:44 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican

the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and around the region.




Evidently this cabal of clowns hasn't clue #1 what DU is ised for nor it's total lack of radioactive properties. This alone tells me this entire "investigation" is a crock.


14 posted on 09/22/2004 11:24:01 AM PDT by USVet6792Retired (Keep up the Fire!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Keep 'em coming. This is the reason we didn't opt for the ICC.


15 posted on 09/22/2004 11:24:43 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

I didn't know that Bagdad (sp) Bob was a judge.


16 posted on 09/22/2004 11:24:52 AM PDT by jerri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw

I'd like to see them f*cking try...

Bush liberated two countries and ousted a hated dictator...and some kangaroo court calls BUSH the criminal?


17 posted on 09/22/2004 11:24:55 AM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Hmm, a trial where the defendent does not speak for himself? Yeah....


18 posted on 09/22/2004 11:25:07 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
These IDIOTS have no idea what they are talking about...do they?

citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation from the Defendant and his government

Maybe someone should send them a copy of the US Constitution.
19 posted on 09/22/2004 11:25:36 AM PDT by swilhelm73 ("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things" -- Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.....heh, no rulings against Osama bin Laden?.....

.....no rulings against Saddam for Crimes against Humanity?...

.....international nutbags!.....


20 posted on 09/22/2004 11:25:39 AM PDT by inconspicuous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
WHATEVER SHALL WE DO?

21 posted on 09/22/2004 11:26:58 AM PDT by Old Sarge (ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USVet6792Retired
Evidently this cabal of clowns hasn't clue #1 what DU is ised for nor it's total lack of radioactive properties.

Unlike radioactive materials which can put off a soft glow, DU'ers* are known for being dull and the antithesis of bright.

*DU=DemocratUnderground
22 posted on 09/22/2004 11:27:39 AM PDT by swilhelm73 ("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things" -- Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Oh brother!.I googled the author and found this hate America piece.

http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14130_opinion.html

America has many opinions about how the world should be run, and we are not afraid to say so either

"We've grown up wrong. When Bush is reelected, Americans won't have to worry about journalists that don't follow party line or the ministry of propaganda - we'll all be in prison or dead. Which should make the right wing happy for awhile, but soon the words of dissent will surface again."

Michael Berglin


23 posted on 09/22/2004 11:27:58 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

...and how many divisions does the International Court have? About as many as the Pope does, I guess...


24 posted on 09/22/2004 11:28:06 AM PDT by HenryLeeII (sultan88, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Is this Clown Court for real?

No.

Article III, section 1:

"The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish".

This "court" is not the US Supreme Court, nor is is ordained and established by Congress as an inferior Article III court.

As pertains to Americans, therefore, it does not exist.

25 posted on 09/22/2004 11:28:08 AM PDT by Jim Noble (FR Iraq policy debate begins 11/3/04. Pass the word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.....btw, who pays the salaries for those nutbags?.....


26 posted on 09/22/2004 11:28:16 AM PDT by inconspicuous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
what next?

President Bush should use a line from comedian Dave Chapelle as a politician at the podium:

"you don't like it? you know what you should do? sanction me!"

27 posted on 09/22/2004 11:34:21 AM PDT by rake (contact the sponsors of CBS! keep the heat on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Kangaroo court...


28 posted on 09/22/2004 11:34:28 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inconspicuous
....btw, who pays the salaries for those nutbags?.....

I checked the website this was supposedly posted on, but the document is no longer there. After checking their homepage , I'd say their salaries are being paid by the likes of Tah-Ray-Zah and George Soros.

29 posted on 09/22/2004 11:34:39 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

.....I think they indicted Clinton for using depleted uranium in Kosovo.....

.....if anyone wants to search for it.....


30 posted on 09/22/2004 11:39:19 AM PDT by inconspicuous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Here's who is behind this thing: Akira MaedaiProfessor, Tokyo Zokei University Sarah Flounders iInternational Action Center, US Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA) Narihiko Ito (Professor, Chuo University) Tokushin Yamauchi (Former Yomitan Village Chief) Special Advisor Ramsey Clark International Action Center, US That should tell you all you need to know. It has no real authority or jurisdiction and began on the assumption that the US had attacked innocent people in the name of "antiterrorism".
31 posted on 09/22/2004 11:40:23 AM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble


In related news, the Court also indicted Mother Teresa for her failure to end world hunger and disease.

Her body will be exumed to face charges.
32 posted on 09/22/2004 11:49:34 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (President Kerry - - there, scared ya didn't I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The DNC spreading false rumors again????
33 posted on 09/22/2004 11:57:59 AM PDT by Getsmart64 (LANTIRN - Designed to kill, maim, and destroy ....America's enemies...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Go look at the document posted, 95% of the Lawyers are Nips. Trying to get even for WWII I'd bet!


34 posted on 09/22/2004 12:00:27 PM PDT by 50 Cal (Next time you think nobody cares if you exist just don't pay the IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50 Cal
"Go look at the document posted, 95% of the Lawyers are Nips. Trying to get even for WWII I'd bet!"

Hey...not to be racists or anything...I lived in Japan for over 5 years...the average Japanese citizen do not like Americans....they still teach in school that we were the bad guys in WWII....
35 posted on 09/22/2004 12:02:54 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (LANTIRN - Designed to kill, maim, and destroy ....America's enemies...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

More like the Monkeys running the zoo


36 posted on 09/22/2004 12:06:39 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (The only way to fight terrorism is to exterminate all of the terrorists..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Uh, guys, this is an obvious hoax. No court ever wrote such a thing. The posted piece itself doesn't even purport to be a court order, but some odd, bastardized description of an order with putative partial quotes (that are certainly bogus). (Anyone who wants to argue, post a link or a news story that shows this order or a news story about it. It doesn't exist, at least as described.)

None of this is to say that the overall point, that there are many international forces that would do this if they could, is false--surely it is true. But they don't have the cojones, and they would hide behind foggy bureaucratic language if they did.

But let's not be all Dan Rather and get all tizzy over garbage.


37 posted on 09/22/2004 12:13:02 PM PDT by Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

MLRS. Cluster Munitions 24/7, 365


38 posted on 09/22/2004 12:23:06 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (The only way to fight terrorism is to exterminate all of the terrorists..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Citing: George Walker Bush, President of the United States and Commander -in-Chief of US military forces for serious crimes ; waging a war of aggression on Afghanistan, war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Afghan people, against prisoners of war ; and the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and around the region.

Come and try and get him, if you think you've got the balls.

39 posted on 09/22/2004 12:27:55 PM PDT by BFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Those who support terrorists should be treated as terrorists! This judge is nothing but a terrorist!


40 posted on 09/22/2004 12:30:45 PM PDT by NavyCaptain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

Now all we need is an address and a copy of "Microsoft dnCBS News Fraud-Print" and boom! legitimate firing orders. :-)


41 posted on 09/22/2004 12:37:54 PM PDT by theDentist (Proud Member of the FreeRepublic "Pajama Hadeen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mak5

RAWA? I suppose women were better off under the Taliban?


42 posted on 09/22/2004 12:42:54 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MisterRepublican
Probably reminds Kerry of the good old days. The winter soldier meetings come to mind.

It's interesting that PRAVDA is running the story like it's real. Birds of a feather???

43 posted on 09/22/2004 12:44:41 PM PDT by snooker (French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson