Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim outrage at prophet slur
Herfordshire-Essex News (UK) ^ | Oct 3, 2004

Posted on 10/04/2004 6:11:52 AM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Tai_Chung
How old was his wife?

6. The marriage was supposedly consumated when she was 8 or 9.

Is her age in dispute?

I've never heard it seriously disputed.

61 posted on 10/04/2004 7:50:11 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black; Tai_Chung

Hadith: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:

Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).


62 posted on 10/04/2004 7:55:58 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe ( Jammin' in my jammies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
The Church, up until the 20th century, called it like it was, Islam is a HERESY!

The 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia entry on Mohammedanism

In matters political Islam is a system of despotism at home and aggression abroad. The Prophet commanded absolute submission to the imâm. In no case was the sword to be raised against him. The rights of non-Moslem subjects are of the vaguest and most limited kind, and a religious war is a sacred duty whenever there is a chance of success against the "Infidel". Medieval and modern Mohammedan, especially Turkish, persecutions of both Jews and Christians are perhaps the best illustration of this fanatical religious and political spirit.
Bring back moral clarity, please!
63 posted on 10/04/2004 7:57:49 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ruiner
"Judging someone who lived in a different culture over a thousand years ago by today's standards is pretty pathetic.
Hate it all you want but there were no statuatory rape laws back then."

You should add a /<sarcasm tag if you are not serious. You are a moron if you are serious. The child was prepubescent.
64 posted on 10/04/2004 8:01:02 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The Prophet Muhammad Had No Comment on the Controversy.


Above: The Prophet Muhammad, in an AP file photo
65 posted on 10/04/2004 8:02:16 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung

"It all depends on your definition of "underage".

How old was his wife?
Is her age in dispute?"

She was nine. and no there is no dispute.


66 posted on 10/04/2004 8:02:41 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

"hate it all you want but there were no statuatory rape laws back then"

Are you crazy? Obviously you have no female children and are not female yourself. You yourself must be a pervert to think that it's just A-OK to have sex with a nine year old child. Girls don't even usually have breast buds by then. You ought to be ashamed of your comment and ask God to forgive you right now


67 posted on 10/04/2004 8:17:51 AM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

These words were written at a time when the Church had moral clarity. Today, morality is governed by the "Proportionalists", although many of us Thomists are beginning to be heard. Proportionalism has clouded the intellect and enhanced and nutured moral relativism.


68 posted on 10/04/2004 8:50:33 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
Today, morality is governed by the "Proportionalists",

I'm not familiar with "Proportionalism." Is it like societal utilitarianism?

69 posted on 10/04/2004 10:22:19 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
There's a good explanation by William May here.
70 posted on 10/04/2004 11:01:34 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ruiner
Judging someone who lived in a different culture over a thousand years ago by today's standards is pretty pathetic.

So why do Muslims hold up Mohammed today as the perfect role model? They are not judging his behavior by today's standards, but they are using his behavior to create modern Muslim standards of behavior.

71 posted on 10/04/2004 11:05:58 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: everyone

MY POST WAS A JOKE!!! PLEASE GET OVER IT AND LOOK UP THE WORD "SARCASM" on www.m-w.com!

Thanks!


72 posted on 10/04/2004 11:13:49 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Hey Publius, Didn't ol' Mohammed also marry rich? I seem to recall something about one of his first wives being rich and influential. Did he use her to build his "religon"?


73 posted on 10/04/2004 11:20:52 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore
Thanks for the link.

Another variant—"proportionalism"—"by weighing the various values and goods being sought, focuses rather on the proportion acknowledged between the good and bad effects of that choice, with a view to the 'greater' good or 'lesser evil' actually possible in a particular situation"

It's very similar to old-fashioned utilitarianism. Mill:

As the foundation of his structure Mill asserts that every man necessarily acts in order to obtain his own happiness; but finding this ground logically insufficient to furnish a basis for an adequate criterion of conduct, and prompted by his own large sympathies, he quickly endeavours to substitute "the happiness of all concerned" for "the agent's own happiness". The argument over which he, the author of a formidable work on logic, endeavours to pass from the first to the second position, may serve as an example suitable to submit to the beginner in logic when he is engaged in the detection of sophisms. The argument, in brief, is that, as each one desires and pursues his own happiness, and the sum total of these individual ends makes up the general happiness, it follows that the general happiness is the one thing desirable by all and provides the Utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct.

74 posted on 10/04/2004 11:49:36 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Yes! That's why I found your post #69 so perceptive.


75 posted on 10/04/2004 12:12:14 PM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I'll be damned...the "Prophet" Mohammed and Michael Jackson DO have something in common.


76 posted on 10/04/2004 12:16:53 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (If arrogance was beauty, New England women would be supermodels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Oh, no..! Not my brand-new wireless keyboard...


77 posted on 10/04/2004 12:18:28 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (If arrogance was beauty, New England women would be supermodels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Question. At which point does an obvious demonstrable fact become a "slur"?

Just wondering...

78 posted on 10/04/2004 1:05:08 PM PDT by Publius6961 (I, also, don't do diplomacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demnomo; All

Can I get an "amen", brothers & sisters? :)


79 posted on 10/04/2004 3:46:49 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

An "amen" comin' right up. :)


80 posted on 10/04/2004 5:04:02 PM PDT by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson