Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bodies of 49 Iraqi soldiers found (Members of the new Iraqi army)
BBC ^ | October 24, 2004 | BBC

Posted on 10/24/2004 2:08:34 AM PDT by Former Military Chick

The bodies of 49 Iraqi army soldiers have been found near the town of Baquba, north-east of Baghdad, according to police. The bodies were laid out in four rows with about 12 bodies in each row, Gen Walid Al-Assawi, commander of the Diyala provincial police, has said.

"After inspection, we found out that they were shot after being ordered to lie down on the earth," he said.

Thirty-seven bodies were found on Saturday, and another 12 on Sunday.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiarmy; napalminthemorning; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: Robert_Paulson2
The Kurds controled northern Iraq.
They want there own nation.
Thats why Saddam used WMD on them.
The Kurds still want freedom.
41 posted on 10/24/2004 7:46:14 AM PDT by earplug (In god you trust. I like my silver and gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpFromTishman
" You're absolutely right about the need to tackle Fallujah and Sadr City. It has been our biggest mistake in the war so far, reverting to squishy State Department diplomacy and nicey-nicey gun buy-backs."

I think it started before the Fallujah compromise. Our biggest mistake was attempting to rebuild a nation before defeating it. That was tried in Vietnam, Somalia and Lebanon, all with identical results. You’d think all the “brilliant” people at the pentagon would have learned that by now.

42 posted on 10/24/2004 8:06:44 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: UpFromTishman
"Why on earth are we giving these thugs a safe haven for making bombs and cutting off heads instead of allowing the Marines to crush them?"

Probably because a bloodbath right before the elections would put the moderates out of power in three months. It needed to be done in April.

43 posted on 10/24/2004 8:10:32 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

The fact that this is good news in the minds of John Kerry and his minions tells me everything I need to know about them.

Socialism kills.


44 posted on 10/24/2004 8:14:11 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Socialism Kills...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lepton; Jonah Johansen

The History Channel recently ran a program on the post WWII SS insurgency. We were very brutal, executing saboteurs and their collaborators, and we outlawed reporting within Germany of saboteur activity.


45 posted on 10/24/2004 8:14:42 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Perhaps, but Allawi would probably lose by as much to people who would surrender it to the radicals.

Defeating Fallujah should have been done in April (or May of 2003). Now we have to either minimize casualties or dump the government and re-fight the whole war like it should have been done a year and a half ago. I favor the latter, but there’s not a chance we’ll go there.

46 posted on 10/24/2004 8:27:27 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
And Senators Biden and McCain TODAY are talking about their biggest concern; that the CIA removed terrorists out of Iraq w/o following the Geneva convention. How I wish they could be removed from power.
47 posted on 10/24/2004 8:57:05 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe ( Lobbying against vanities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

The Iraqi soliers are going to have to learn to shoot the enemy. Even if it is another Iraqi.


48 posted on 10/24/2004 8:58:44 AM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratCutie
this is just too sad... that bunch of folks, trying to have a good life, trying to have a good job, and psychos continue to kill them

What amazes me is the courage they display just by standing in line to sign up, much less being in the Iraqi force.

49 posted on 10/24/2004 8:59:17 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe ( Lobbying against vanities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Nov. 2nd - W surpasses 300 EVs.

Nov. 3rd - hellfire and fury on Fallujah and Sadr City, for starters, and the Dems scream "I told you so!" as our military kicks some terrorist butt. Meanwhile, Iraq starts to settle down in time for the Christians there to celebrate Christmas without getting their heads chopped.
50 posted on 10/24/2004 9:13:04 AM PDT by Carling (What happened to Sandy Burglar's Docs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

The terrorists have made a grave mistake in attacking Iraqis. They are only giving the Iraqis more reason to hate them and turn them in.


51 posted on 10/24/2004 9:18:03 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Hmmm


52 posted on 10/24/2004 9:19:13 AM PDT by Cheetah1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

Uh, No... he has great respect and support BECAUSE he is standing up to the terrorists...


http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/2004/10/pro-war-on-terror-voter.html

"He's capable and dynamic," she said. "He acts on his words. He always says that he will fight terrorism."

Bush supporter? No. Nor is it an Aussie voter explaining support for Austrialian Prime Minister John Howard's re-election. (See Belmont Club analysis on Howard's relection win - Howard won handily in an encouraging mirror of the Bush-Kerry matchup.)

Nope. It's an Allawi supporter in Iraq, quoted in an article on the upcoming Iraq election.

"I will vote for Ayad Allawi because he is tough and knows very well how to deal with Iraqis," said Suad Hamid, a 46-year-old Muslim Shiite housewife.

Iraqis are impressed with Allawi because he appears to be strong and decisive. "He is the only (one) who can bring security," said Saeb Salman, 28, who has a cigarette stand on a main street in central Baghdad.

Even Mona al-Hussein, who said she did not trust the former exiles, said she may end up voting for Allawi. "He's capable and dynamic," she said. "He acts on his words. He always says that he will fight terrorism." She conceded that Allawi has yet to succeed in crushing the insurgents. "I don't blame him, it's a difficult task."

Allawi's determination to end the militants' control of Samarra, Fallujah and Najaf has impressed many Iraqis, said Baghdad University professor Abdul-Razzaq Naas. Naas predicted that the religious parties will not do well in Baghdad. "Most Iraqis are secular when it comes to voting. They don't believe in religion as part of the state," he said.

With our 'hand-picked' Karzai likely to get re-elected, and Allawi likely to continue support for a time, the voters in both countries are signalling a "yes" to the question: "Are you on the side of Western civilization against the global terrorist network?"

There is a claim that 'confusion reigns' here. But these voters seem particularly discriminating on issues of leadership and being able to DO what it takes to eliminate a scourge. One that many Iraqis oppose as strongly as American voters.

Who are we to judge? We have idiots in America who actually claim that a draft is coming - despite a 402-2 vote to turn it down (only Democrats voted for it, 100% of Republicans against it), despite Bush's ironclad "it's not going to happen on my watch" comment, despite the Bush plan to bring troops home from Cold War deployments in Germany, despite the huge victories in Afghanistan and Iraq that proved we can do so much more with fewer troops than ever before. Yet idiots keep making ignorant claims about the draft coming back. HOW DAFT CAN THEY BE?

The Democrats are flunking, but Pro-War on Terror voters are passing the test globally. They know who we need to win this fight and they are picking accordingly.


53 posted on 10/24/2004 9:21:15 AM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: milemark
near the Iranian border

Perhaps not Iraqis at all but Iranian regulars. It's just a matter of time, Iran is looking for trouble.

54 posted on 10/24/2004 9:26:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I shocking and sad story... These 50 soldiers were most likely decent Iraqi men trying to make a decent living and providing security to their country.

The terrorists have given us another good reason to fight them without any mercy.


55 posted on 10/24/2004 9:32:29 AM PDT by Kurt_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

These were recruits in the new Iraqi army. I think it's not exaggerating to say things are getting out of control.


56 posted on 10/24/2004 9:33:10 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Let US commanders run the war on terror in iraq,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

so true..


57 posted on 10/24/2004 9:34:38 AM PDT by ArmyBratCutie ("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
I don't understand why the families and friends of the slain "good" Iraqis don't get mad enough to turn the terrorist pigs in and bring a semblance of security to their country.

Not too hard to understand. It's easier, and safer, for Iraqis to transfer their anger toward America and its military, so that's what they do.

58 posted on 10/24/2004 9:36:54 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Let US commanders run the war on terror in iraq,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
I can't help wondering why people (soldiers and civilians) under these circumstances surrender rather than to go down fightin?

That is a serious question. When you know that you are going to be shot in the head or have your head removed with a dull knife...

59 posted on 10/24/2004 9:37:36 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

"In Iraq, during Hussein's rule, an Iraqi could leave his doors unlocked. Crime was a...excuse me, a nuisance."

HORSEFEATHERS.

Do you really believe that? I think you had better go back and check the source of that informaion. After all, what is your basis for knowings such a fact?

Right.

It is probably something said by Bagdad bob.

A people does not change overnight. I am sure there was lots of crime going on in Saddam's Iraq. We just didn't hear about it, nor did it get reported.

By saying this you are implying that the nation went from extremely civilized to savage overnight - and just because we are there. Such a statement does not pass the smell test.

In addition, perhaps the Iraqi's under Saddam were required to leave their doors unlocked. After all, many of the thieves and hoodlums we are currently fighting were in power. Perhaps it was a requirement that you leave your doors unlocked so that they found it easy to steal whatever they wanted.


60 posted on 10/24/2004 9:37:47 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson