Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN - Asked Directly About Missing Weapons, Pres. Bush "Declined to comment."
Judy Woodruff, CNN Inside Politics ^ | 10/26/04 | CNN - Inside Politics

Posted on 10/26/2004 12:12:58 PM PDT by freestyle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: freestyle

I sure hope he know something we don't -

Perhaps she hit him before he had gotten the facts - a wise man will hold an answer until certain of such - There is a time and place for everything -


just my thoughts - Mrs. Bush was ever so right about the media - and what they can and will do during an election -


41 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:24 PM PDT by Pastnowfuturealpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lahargis

he knows that no matter what he says, it will be spun the way MSM wants it spun. he (or his surrogates) will speak at the right time, IMO.


42 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:30 PM PDT by tazannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bungarian
I've got a question for John Kerry. Does he intend to let all the soldiers who would be disgusted having him for a Commander in Chief resign?

Kerry declined to comment.

43 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:38 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Does that mean that she yelled the question at him along with every other reporter there and he didn't answer her?


44 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:42 PM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freestyle

Anything Bush says is pulled apart, dissected and taken out of context...I think it is wise he lets someone else in his campaign handle these and the rest of the accusations that are coming....they are truly desperate...but America is tired of this...and the media bias is now very transparent...


45 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:48 PM PDT by IndianPrincessOK (Native American pleading for Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight

By the way, I lean toward the genius theory. They probably have internal polling that shows this crap is suffocating Kerry's message and they don't intend to give him any oxygen.


46 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:48 PM PDT by LikeLight (__________________________)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: puroresu
The lie is being exposed. They are probably going to let lurch get up to his neck in the hole he is digging, and then bury him with new TV ads and stump speeches.
48 posted on 10/26/2004 12:20:59 PM PDT by ol painless (ol' painless is out of the bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freestyle
Bush checked to the flop.
49 posted on 10/26/2004 12:21:05 PM PDT by bmwcyle (I wear sleepwear therefore I think (When they are off I am single minded))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
The problem is, people are early voting.

I doubt that many undecideds are voting early...

50 posted on 10/26/2004 12:21:38 PM PDT by danneskjold (All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Rush Limbaugh did a job on the New York Slimes, PMSNBC, NBC and best of all the phony Irishman Kerry. This guy Kerry is out of the same mold as Madam Albright.


51 posted on 10/26/2004 12:21:54 PM PDT by hgro (You make)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

I have suspected that Rove had an "October Surprise" for some time; and based on what he learned in 2000, it will NOT come out until Fri. or Sat., when it is too late for Francois to refute it. I have no inside knowledge, just a hunch. Don't know if this is part of it or not.


52 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:05 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tazannie

You hit the nail on the head! Why speak directly to the MSM that just put a knife in your back.


53 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:19 PM PDT by ol painless (ol' painless is out of the bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: freestyle

In silence it implies: You stepped in dog poop. Don't come to me. Clean up your own mess.


54 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:30 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freestyle

Ed Gillespie is all over this. I just received this email:

______________
It's October, but it's no surprise. Remember last week, when I highlighted a quote by Newsweek editor Evan Thomas that the media's desire to see John Kerry elected may be worth five-to-twenty million votes, and urged you to be on the look-out for evidence of that desire in articles and news programs?

Well, yesterday the front page of New York Times featured a flawed article asserting, "The Iraqi interim government has warned the United States and international nuclear inspectors that nearly 380 tons of powerful conventional explosives -- used to demolish buildings, make missile warheads and detonate nuclear weapons -- are missing from one of Iraq's most sensitive former military installations. The huge facility, called Al Qaqaa, was supposed to be under American military control but is now a no man's land, still picked over by looters as recently as Sunday."

CBS News' "60 Minutes" admitted today they were saving the same story to air the Sunday before the election.

John Kerry seized on the New York Times headline to launch a political attack on President Bush, saying U.S. troops "failed to guard those stockpiles" and that is "one of the great blunders" of the war.

Senator Kerry and the New York Times leave the impression that these weapons went missing recently and U.S. troops were derilict in their duty to guard the stockpile--neither of which is true.

Network and cable news programs repeated the incomplete report and Sen. Kerry's attacks more than 100 times on Monday.

But last night NBC "Nightly News" reported that on April 10, 2003, one day after Baghdad fell, U.S. troops entered Al Qaqaa, accompanied by an embedded reporter from NBC, and found no such weapons.

It also turns out that our troops have found and destroyed or are destroying 400,000 tons of weapons and explosives.

There was no mention of either one of these facts in today's New York Times front page story, which regurgitated yesterday's charges and Senator Kerry's attacks based on them.

Liberal groups like MoveOn.org have already blasted out e-mails repeating the discredited report and urging people to vote against President Bush based on the flawed coverage.

We can not count on the media to set the story straight. We have to get the truth out to our friends and neighbors ourselves.

We are counting on YOU to set the record straight. Please forward this e-mail and the attached fact sheet to family and friends, call your local network, call talk radio, write letters to the editor, and post facts on blogs.

I suspect you'll be hearing from me again in the course of the next seven days as Mr. Thomas's prediction proves true again.


Sincerely,

Ed Gillespie
Chairman, Republican National Committee


55 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:35 PM PDT by Deo et Patria (Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bungarian
The MSM would love a Bush quote to make it more news.

Exactly...Strategery...

56 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:35 PM PDT by danneskjold (All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freestyle
Kerry is making the case Iraq was dangerous. The whole country was an ammo dump. If we use this to educate folks what Saddam was actually running there and that the UN IAEA was complicit in keeping him in business it may help. This will take a bit more than a 7 second sound byte
57 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:40 PM PDT by DaveMSmith (I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, nevermind. - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomeSlice

I don't know if even Kerry will try to keep going on this line of silliness.

It would be a criticism of the troops on the ground and not the President.

Although, they have already done that and don't even realize it. How is Kerry supposed to lead these people he keeps using as proof of failure?


58 posted on 10/26/2004 12:22:57 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freestyle

Did he actively "decline to comment" on this particular issue - or was it a question (among others) launched at him on the trail today to which he did not respond at all??? That makes a big difference.


59 posted on 10/26/2004 12:23:05 PM PDT by Kylie_04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freestyle

That F*****g B***h "Judy Woodruff"


60 posted on 10/26/2004 12:23:32 PM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson