Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priority 1: Remove Specter from the Judciary (Day 2)
11-4-04 | Always Right

Posted on 11/04/2004 5:54:36 AM PST by Always Right

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-285 next last
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
Here is a great phone script just given to me by FReeper "JimB in Venice" (an advertising exec, so he sure knows how to sell!).

PLEASE CALL Bill Frist's number at (202) 224-3344 (they may switch you to a "comment line", and leave the following message:

Senator Frist, congratuations on the tremendous victory for the Republican Party. My name is _____ from ______-and my phone number is _______. I have been one of the volunteers working hard to help accomplish this great victory.. spending a lot of my own money and time. Americans have sent a strong message that we want a conservative Supreme Court bench. We want conservative federal judges. And we have a strong mandate for you to accomplish that task. Please don't let us down. The appointments we make in the next few years will have a resounding affect on our future. Please do not appoint Sen Specter to head a judiciary committee. Look for stronger conservative leadership in this position. You have the right.. and the will of the people as permission to do so. And again, congratulations.

Also, remember that we should NEVER be angry or threatening, especially to people on our own side. So congratulate, be upbeat, postive, victorious and reassuring!

And pass this info on to everyone else you know!

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

61 posted on 11/04/2004 7:05:33 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Add me!


62 posted on 11/04/2004 7:06:36 AM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Please add me to your ping list.


63 posted on 11/04/2004 7:06:52 AM PST by Elkiejg (The Democratic Party belongs in a 3rd. world country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sandalwood
Specter is a prime example of what’s wrong with our party, but the bigger problem is that Republicans refuse to eliminate impediments to supporting conservative policies and edicts. The RNC continues to give “leadership” positions to pansies like Lott, Hatch, and Frist, whose primary objective is to “make nice” with their socialist “friend from the other side.”

Their gutless and spineless actions to combat Democrat tactics or threats, when there are any, only serve to embolden pathetic scumbags like Specter and his liberal counterparts. Dasshole’s “supermajority” nonsense was met with nothing more than whining and hand wringing, followed by vacuous threats from Frist, which probably resulted in Democrats laughing their backsides off behind closed doors.

From Bush’s nonsensical “new tone” crapola to “working to unify the country”, its bovine excrement that serves only to impede the conservative mandate the President was given. The fact that Specter felt comfortable and confident enough to “warn” the President about his judicial appointments, seems to indicate that the limp-wristed Republican pansy “leadership” will continue as it has in the past.

The President was given a huge opportunity to guide this country back toward its founding principles well into the century, leaving a legacy demonstrable of his decency and moral conviction. To place a egomaniacal RINO pustule like Specter in a position where his efforts to “right” this country can be thwarted, is unbelievably stupid and inconceivable.

That being said, I fully expect that gutless pansy Frist to announce Specter as Chairmen of the Judiciary Committee.
64 posted on 11/04/2004 7:08:39 AM PST by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wdkeller

B-U-M-P


65 posted on 11/04/2004 7:13:46 AM PST by shezza (We will not tire, we will not falter, we will not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

bttt


66 posted on 11/04/2004 7:16:30 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Go for it. Keep me informed of every detail.


67 posted on 11/04/2004 7:17:03 AM PST by Liz (The man who establishes the reputation of rising at dawn, can sleep til noon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
FWIW- Laura Ingram is ripping Specter right now.

Glad to see some traction. The bright lights of talk radio need to shine on Specter and his vision of liberal judicial activism. We can not allow this back-stabber in position of power over these nominations. We really need Rush and Brit to get on board.

68 posted on 11/04/2004 7:17:30 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Always Right; cgk; Jim Noble
Here's my letter I just Faxed to Frist..........

Majority Leader Frist,

Please do NOT allow Senator Specter to become leader of the Judiciary Committee.

These comments were made by Senator Specter yesterday, as reported by (http://www.philly.com)

Specter, as presumptive chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, suggested that he would block any Bush nominee to the Supreme Court who opposed abortion rights. Reiterating his position that a woman's right to choose is "inviolate," he said overturning Roe v. Wade today would be akin to trying to reverse Brown v. Board of Education, the court's 1954 landmark desegregation decision.

"If you have a race that is won by a percent or two, you have a narrowly divided country, and that's not a traditional mandate," he said. "President Bush will have that very much in mind."

"The number-one item on my agenda is to try to move the party to the center," Specter said. "I want to focus on the politics of inclusion."


The results of the election on Tuesday clearly showed this is not a divided country. This is the 1st election since the 1930's that a President was re-elected and his party picked up both House and Senate seats.

I believe this country wants to move more to the right. We must take this opportunity that has presented itself by holding the Democrats feet to the fire and continue to push the agenda of LIFE!

Putting Senator Specter as head of the Judiciary would stymie and, to use one of Sec. Def. Rumsfeld's words, slog the Judicial appointment process.

Since Senator Specter has clearly stated that he has a "LITMUS TEST" (Roe Vs. Wade should stay) I hope this helps you see that Senator Specter is NOT the right man for the Head of the Judiciary committee.

I believe, as does President Bush, that we must project a culture of life not a culture of death.

I'll leave you with a question to ponder.......

"How do you teach a child to be responsible and accept consequences of their actions in life when you teach them that life can be eviscerated in the womb and there is no longer a responsibility to care for life?"

XXXXXXX

69 posted on 11/04/2004 7:22:43 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Have you seen the extent of Bush country in PA?

http://alt.cimedia.com/ajc/pdf/elect_results_uscounty.pdf


70 posted on 11/04/2004 7:24:26 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101
That being said, I fully expect that gutless pansy Frist to announce Specter as Chairmen of the Judiciary Committee.

Well, the only way to get Frist to act is to put as much pressure on him as possible. If we do nothing, you are right, Frist will allow Specter to become Chairman. Frist will only act if lots of pressure is applied.

71 posted on 11/04/2004 7:25:52 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

My gut is that the only way Specter will be denied Judiciary is if someone with more seniority wants it. Who would that be, I wonder?


72 posted on 11/04/2004 7:26:06 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Who's got Frist's email address?


73 posted on 11/04/2004 7:28:45 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

JimB is so much more solicitous than I.


74 posted on 11/04/2004 7:29:13 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

senator_frist@frist.senate.gov


75 posted on 11/04/2004 7:31:20 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Looks like your post is a quotation. Of what?

Dan


76 posted on 11/04/2004 7:33:01 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Thomas Sowell wrote: "Perhaps Dachle's defeat at the polls will send a message to other Senate Democrats that partisan obstruction is not what the voters sent them to Washington to do." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1270294/posts

Too bad there are Republicans who need the same message. Especially Spector, who owes his reelection solely to President Bush's choice to support his reelection.
77 posted on 11/04/2004 7:33:32 AM PST by The Great Yazoo (Why do penumbras not emanate from the Tenth Amendment as promiscuously as they do from the First?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

add me too


78 posted on 11/04/2004 7:37:04 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003

Capital Toll Free # 1-877-762-8762
I just called and all Frist's lines are busy.


79 posted on 11/04/2004 7:37:07 AM PST by stevio (Thank you Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I disagree. I think Arlen will play ball. He owes President Bush, and he doesn't want to be forever reviled in his own party.

I tend to see his statement as a feint--by positioning himself as a "moderate" he takes on enormous credibility with the media. If Spector supports a nominee, it will really take the wind out of the liberal's sails.

80 posted on 11/04/2004 7:38:53 AM PST by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson