Is this Ax handle long enough?
Wouldn't he be REACHING OUT enough ?
Posted on 11/04/2004 7:20:02 AM PST by ambrose
There are a lot of them. Nuclear weapons?
Mark Levin says the President should reach across the aisle and slap some of them. Maybe it will wake them up.
Give them their deportation papers, and march them into to the sea.
If the Democrats would just 1)expand their civil-liberties positions to cover the Second Amendment, 2)accept reasonable limits on late-term abortion (i.e. only to prevent serious physical risk to the mother after the cerebral cortex is distinctly developed), and 3)let the states take over most social programs and decide how to run them, I'd seriously consider voting for them. I'm not holding my breath.
I'm personally quite tired of this democrat question:
How can the President "Reach out" to hate spouting, morally corrupt types that embrace the Michael Moores and Ben Afflecks of the world while rejecting the Condoleeza Rices and Mel Gibsons?
The fact is this:
48% is the MINORITY.
How do we conquer this "divide"? How bout the minority start walking towards US.
Rangers Lead the Way.
Why do people assume that the winnner should 'reach out' to the losers? Shouldn't we at least examine the possibility that the losers should 'reach out' to the winner? I mean, he IS the winner. I just think this idea of the winner 'reaching out' is bass ackwards. Let the losers go 'hat in hand'...why should the winnner act like he lost?
Eliminate the free goodies and tell them to take the jobs "that Americans won't do" or lay down in the street and die!
Screw Them.
He can reach out all he wants to but it is up to us to pray and convert them to conservatism.
"Throw your weapons and down and walk toward the nearest republican with your hands up"!! ??
free passports to New Zealand.. libs,, get them now while they last..
A labotamoty.
Honestly, as a former Lib myself, it takes a bitch-slappin' of some sort. The election may be a wake-up call that they are NOT the majority, and that they are truly the bigots.
While France may deserve that, we don't need to speek to anybody including France with Kerry's dupliciousness.
The only role that I can think that would be appropriate for Kerry would be to attend Arafat's funeral. Because only Arafat is more duplicious than Kerry. But then I don't think the US should send a representative at all to Arafat's funeral.
Either that or let Kerry run out in front of the troops in Iraq and be the body armor that he refused to vote for.
Cut the deficit and work towards a balanced budget.
Win the peace in Iraq.
Secure the borders.
Eliminate the IRS.
Nominate conservative judges.
A self-sufficiency energy policy that lessens our dependency on other countries' oil.
A FAIR trade policy.
not necessarily in that order
I prefer the Secretary of State we got now. This is one thing I like about Bush is he gives Powell the freedom to speak his mind without coming down on him. That's something the Dems need to learn.
Now THAT is F-ing funny.
Brilliant.
I will use that MULTIPLE TIMES today.
The majority of those who voted for Kerry did so because Kerry is not Bush. Kinda hard for Bush to 'reach out' to those who rejected Bush for being Bush - he's still Bush.
Maybe the 48% need to reach out to the 52%.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.