Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mothers dilemma: which son should I save? (two sons, each needs one of her kidneys)
The Scotsman ^ | 12/6/04 | ALISON HARDIE

Posted on 12/06/2004 12:33:05 PM PST by dead

MELANIE Campbell is locked in a dilemma every mother would dread - she can save the life of one of her seriously ill sons but the other would face death.

Today she has said she cannot make that choice and that could mean both will die.

Luke and Ashley Campbell, both 14, who were born with their triplet sister Sinead, both suffer from cysts on their kidneys - a condition that will become fatal without a transplant.

Their mother is a perfect tissue match for both boys, but can only donate one of her kidneys and is facing choosing one over the other.

Their plight has again highlighted the chronic shortage of transplant organs available to seriously ill patients in Britain.

It will also increase pressure on the government to overhaul the law after attempts at both Holyrood and Westminster to introduce a system of "presumed consent" were thrown out by Labour ministers.

Mrs Campbell, 35, of Newport, South Wales, said last night the boys’ illness had put her under an almost intolerable strain, especially once she learned she was a perfect tissue match for both.

She had hoped that she and her husband Steve, a 36-year-old army sergeant, could both help the boys by donating one kidney each.

However, she was horrified to find that only she shared the same blood group and tissue type as Luke and Ashley.

Mrs Campbell summed up her dilemma: "What would I have to do - toss a coin?"

She went on: "I think about it all the time. I would give up my life for my children but there’s only one of me and two of them.

"I couldn’t give a kidney to one and leave the other. I love my boys so much. I’d do anything to protect them. It would be easy if there were just one, but I can’t save them both and I just cannot choose one.

"I wouldn’t want one of them to grow up and ask: ‘Why did you choose him instead of me?’"

Luke and Ashley were diagnosed with the hereditary condition - familial juvenile nephrophthisis. Both Mr and Mrs Campbell carry the gene which affects boys, however their triplet sister Sinead is not affected.

The boys, who must undergo dialysis treatment eight hours a day, six days a week, have been waiting 20 months for suitable organs to become available.

Although they are facing their medical treatment bravely, the family has had to accept that time is running out to find a donor to help them.

Mrs Campbell, yesterday described the moment when the family was told of the illness affecting both boys.

She said: "I was absolutely devastated. I can remember going into a room and I just wanted to punch somebody. I felt so angry.

"Steven and I both carry the gene, but we did not know it.

"We’d never even heard of this thing before - but it has had a huge effect on our lives.

"Luke and Ashley have been very brave. They don’t complain but they are going through it.

"They are very close and which ever one goes first for the transplant, the other will be supporting him all the way."

The Campbells were told early last year by the consultants at Bristol Children’s Hospital caring for Luke and Ashley that a transplant was the only option if the youngsters were to lead a normal, healthy life.

Mrs Campbell said children normally get a new kidney within four to six months but Luke and Ashley have waited longer because of their rare tissue.

Since the boys were born the family has lived in Hong Kong and Germany, where their father was based.

When they returned to Britain and lived in Oxfordshire it became clear the boys were not growing as quickly as Sinead and doctors did blood tests.

Mrs Campbell said: "It was then that doctors found an abnormality in their kidney function.

"The condition has worsened in the last few years and they get tired very easily."

But the two boys, who go to Bassaleg Comprehensive in Newport, are typical teenagers who play computer games and go swimming - although they are not allowed to play their favourite sport, rugby.

Mrs Campbell, who carries a pager in case a kidney becomes available, admitted the situation dominates their lives.

She said: "We are on call round the clock. Even if we go out for the evening one of us doesn’t drink just in case. We could get a call at any time of day or night."

Mrs Campbell criticised the transplant system in Britain where people have to carry a donor card if they want their organs to be used after death.

Even if a consent card has been signed, families can withhold consent.

She said she supports the campaign to adopt an "opt-out" scheme where people have to declare they do not want their organs used.

Her efforts to help her sons have also included fund raising for research charities and next year she plans to run a half marathon to raise funds for the National Kidney Research Fund.

She also raised more than £1,200 in Germany with a parachute jump, while two years ago she and sister, Julia, abseiled down a 12-storey hospital building.

Now Mrs Campbell has said she cannot possibly choose between her sons and will not make a choice now but, despite the already long wait for a suitable other donor, hopes she will not have to.

"When a kidney becomes available the doctors will decide which of the boys needs it most urgently.

"Then, all being well, I will give one of my kidneys to the other twin. It is the only way we can do it - if the decision was left to me it would be impossible."

Bill O’Neill, the Scottish secretary, of the British Medical Association, said the Campbell case underlined the need for reform of the law.

He said: "Clearly this is a devastatingly sad example of a dilemma that is created when there are insufficient organs for transplantation. There needs to be a change to a system of presumed consent to reverse the chronic shortage of transplant organs in Britain."

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: dead

A truly heartbreaking position for a parent to be in. However, the mother is making contradictory statements about how it would be easy to save one of one, but impossible to save one of two. Were I in such a postion, you can be damn certain I would chose one or the other. To let both die because you can't save both is wrong.

The solution to the scarcity of organs is to allow people to sell them. It is ironic that the people most likely to oppose such a system are the same one that laud the sanctity of one's body when the issue is abortion.

41 posted on 12/06/2004 1:55:46 PM PST by Yancey Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fritzz

no prob, we wouldn't even know about this if it didn't fit someone's agenda.

42 posted on 12/06/2004 1:56:17 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dead
It will also increase pressure on the government to overhaul the law after attempts at both Holyrood and Westminster to introduce a system of "presumed consent" were thrown out by Labour ministers.

This is the real meaning of this piece, the dilemma faced by those who think that the state has an obligation to order not just the lives of their subjects but their deaths and disposal as well.

The writer follows the standard line of introducing the reader to a very sympathetic person, fleshes out this poster person and then slams home the sword of guilt.

The method seemingly works for it is used to justify criminal acts by thugs as well as members of state from the punishment of ordinary people for acts of defense to the reward offered for reporting those few sane who still object.

The poor woman illustrated here cannot possibly make such a decision without harm but sickness is never fair.

43 posted on 12/06/2004 2:06:12 PM PST by Old Professer (The accidental trumps the purposeful in every endeavor attended by the incompetent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII misunderstood.I am not critisizing the mother.I made a observation of her statement,saying she would sacrifice herself and immediately contradicting it.
I sympathize with her.I just think there is more recourse than this article would have you think.

44 posted on 12/06/2004 2:13:03 PM PST by loboinok (GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOU AIM AT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: monday

She can give up both of her kidney's and go on dialysis and wait for a donor for herself. Dialysis works quite well. I have firsthand experience.

45 posted on 12/06/2004 2:35:00 PM PST by Shellback Chuck (Hey John, whose your daddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dead

This is a horrendous predicament, butr consider: If their kidneys are so difficult to match, isn't it likely that at some point a single kidney might become available from some other donor? How do they decide who gets it in that case? Isn't it the same decision? Would she turn it down because it would only save one of the boys?

46 posted on 12/06/2004 2:39:47 PM PST by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shellback Chuck
Why do that though? Is she more capable of being on dialysis than her sons? Who is going to pay for the extra operation and why in the world would anyone think that three people having kidney transplants would be better than only having two people having kidney transplants?

The idea that she should harm her health for no discernible advantage for her sons strikes me as absurd. If she really wants to get on with it, have her sons play a game of rock, scissors, paper for her spare kidney. Then she won't have to decide.
47 posted on 12/06/2004 2:55:33 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fritzz; camle

The movie is called "The Big Carnival" with an alternate title of "Ace in the Hole."

48 posted on 12/06/2004 3:00:31 PM PST by EllaMinnow (For the first time in over 20 years, I'm not represented by Bob Graham! Go MEL!! Viva Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: sandbar
**As is Shannon. And might I remind our readers that a main character in Gone with the Wind was named Ashley.**

Yes, indeed. :o)

51 posted on 12/06/2004 3:07:59 PM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow


52 posted on 12/06/2004 3:18:35 PM PST by fritzz (Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina

She said she would then give a kidney to the other boy.

I'm with the other posters in saying that I think I would have to give up both of mine and go on dialysis myself.

53 posted on 12/06/2004 7:15:50 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dead
They should go to China, where they have a very well established kidney transplant service, and no morals or ethics whatsoever.

Condemned prisoners there provide kidneys to people from all over Asia-- fresh, too! The boys could choose from a catalog of prisoners, to be executed to order when their blood type matches a recipient's.

If no match were found, the Chinese surgeons would be just as happy to take both of Mom's kidneys and put her on dialysis.


54 posted on 12/06/2004 8:25:48 PM PST by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Hello, yesterday I read this in our Dutch Paper "De Telegraaf" and I was shocked, is there a way to give my organ if I have the same blood group as those 2 kids? Them I'm able to rescue those lives.. can somebody tell me if it's possible? and how I can come in conversation with them?

I come from the Netherlands so maybe my english is not good as well.

You can also contact me at msn:

Thanks for the information

55 posted on 12/14/2004 3:32:03 AM PST by mauriceNL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson