Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Growing: Movement is new form of evangelism
Religion News ^ | Dec 7th,2004

Posted on 12/07/2004 5:12:03 AM PST by missyme

As we enter the 21st century, a vital new expression of Christianity is growing in the United States and worldwide. This movement even has a name. It is called "the Emergent Church."

This movement expresses what I call "progressive evangelicalism," because it emphasizes traditional evangelical beliefs - affirming the doctrines of the Apostle's Creed, a high view of Scripture and the importance of a personal transforming relationship with a resurrected Christ - yet rejects the structures and styles of institutionalized Christianity. The Emergent Church

The Emergent Church turns away from spending money on buildings. Instead, most congregations meet as "house churches" or gather in makeshift storefronts and warehouses.

Emergent churches espouse a decentralized grassroots form of Christianity that rejects the hierarchal systems of denominational churches. Each emergent congregation makes its own decisions by consensus.

Leadership is fluid, with all members sharing authority and participating in the mission of the church. Task forces are assembled to undertake such specific programs as feeding the homeless, establishing a partnership with a Third World church, developing an after-school tutoring program for disadvantaged children or organizing people in a poor neighborhood to solve pressing social problems.

The missionary programs of such congregations are committed to direct involvement with those they decide to serve. These churches want little to do with bureaucratic organizations with professional administrators. Members of these congregations want to be involved personally with those in need. They want to know the names and faces of the people they serve.

Emergent congregations must not be confused with those nondenominational mega-churches that seem to be popping up increasingly in communities across the nation. In fact, the two are markedly different.

Emergent churches often express a disdain for the "contemporary-worship music" heard in many mega-churches.

The worship in emergent churches often includes classical music, and such congregations often follow a more formal liturgical style that may even incorporate such ancient forms of praying as that of monastic orders.

The people who join emergent congregations are often folks who have tired of what goes on in churches that have "contemporary services."

A postmodern mindset

The Emergent Church is often somewhat indifferent to theological and social issues that seem urgent to mainstream evangelicalism. These church members tend to think that the crusade against homosexual marriage is a waste of time and energy, and they tend to reject the exclusivistic claims that many evangelicals make about salvation.

They are not about to damn the likes of Gandhi or the Dali Lama to hell simply because they have not embraced Christianity.

In many ways, these Christians express a postmodern mindset that may come across as being somewhat "new age."

They see care for the environment as a major Christian responsibility. They are attracted to Christian mysticism. They talk a great deal about "spiritual formation" and focus significant attention on the healing of illnesses through prayer.

This new expression of Christianity is growing faster than most sociologists could have predicted. It is thriving, in part, because so many people are fed up with the arguing and pettiness that they claim are all too evident in the rest of Christendom.

It remains to be seen whether the Emergent Church will fade away or become an ongoing expression of Christianity.

But there is no question that it is attracting many sophisticated Christians who contend that traditional mainline churches are devoid of vitality and mega-churches are irrelevantly narrow.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: emergentchurch; evangelicals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: missyme
Sounds good to me, but I was a member of just sort a group in the early 70's and for a few years after.. They(a group) can grow rapidly, but is prone to the same problems the early "church" had.. Namely, strange doctrine creeping in.. producing strange splinter groups..

Humans love a good story.. and after producing one(a good story) many will follow the story teller to hell and back.. just like in the first century A.D... and beyond.. I.E. Joseph Campbell, Wayne Dyer, Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Evolution Theory(many proponents), some main line "churchs", and many others.(you can add to this list, I'm sure)

Yeah.. cut a few sheeple out of the fold, come up with a good story and Viola!.. a "church".. The test is, as I see it, is not becoming a member of ANY church, but just "BEING the church" all on your own.. all by yourself. Becoming a CULT with only one member.. YOU... Fraternization with other "cults" couldn't hurt as long as you don't join them.. Its the joining thing that empties your head and heart and makes you a sheeple which is food for wolves-->> Who are dressed as sheeple with a good story or even a bad story(some humans are easier than others).. The study of Alpha male and female wolves and their underlings(Beta, Gamma etc.) is a TALE for another time... When approaching clergy, look for the tail, but they hide it real good..

41 posted on 12/07/2004 9:14:37 AM PST by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Everything sounded great til I got here:

The Emergent Church is often somewhat indifferent to theological and social issues that seem urgent to mainstream evangelicalism. These church members tend to think that the crusade against homosexual marriage is a waste of time and energy, and they tend to reject the exclusivistic claims that many evangelicals make about salvation.

Here they depart from Scripture. Alas, they are no improvement on the mainstream church that they reject.

42 posted on 12/07/2004 9:19:23 AM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlieOK1
"They are not about to damn the likes of Gandhi or the Dali Lama to hell simply because they have not embraced Christianity."

CharlieOK1: "I am a Baptist and strong in my Christian beliefs, but this is something that I have struggled with. Would be interested in discussion on this subject, but maybe I need to head over to the Religion board."

What's to struggle with? Remember the thief on the cross? He was one of God's Elect, but it wasn't evident until the very day he died.

Just because Gandhi or the Dali Lama don't embrace the ONE true God today, doesn't mean we can count them out just yet.

Where there's life, there's hope that they (and many others) are one of God's elect (that he chose before the foundation of the earth. Rev.13:7-8; 17:8; Acts 13:48; Romans 8:28-30; Romans 9:11-13; Romans 11:7; 2Thess.2:13; 1 Pet.1:1 (NIV); 2:9, etc., etc., etc.

43 posted on 12/07/2004 9:27:39 AM PST by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: missyme

The bible spells out that in the end times many will mistake Satan for the real thing.


44 posted on 12/07/2004 9:32:37 AM PST by OKIEDOC (LL THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ktupper; Tares
If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

Salvation: the free gift that costs everybody everything but is worth even more.

45 posted on 12/07/2004 9:42:07 AM PST by Theophilus (Save Little Democrats, Stop Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
St. John 14:6

?.................What part of,..... "NO".....don't you understand?

(Romans 10:17)

46 posted on 12/07/2004 9:46:17 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: maestro
.......The Emergent Gnostic Kristian Leach of Kristian Science......Haters of the 66 books of the bible? Another Ecumenical Kingdom Unity Theory.......of mess-ianic roots nonsense..... :-( (Romans 10:17)

Huh? Maybe another cup of coffee then you could try reposting this in traditional conservative English. Thanks.

47 posted on 12/07/2004 9:48:43 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randita
I kind of feel that the contemporary praise music seeks to manufacture a level of emotional involvement that feels manipulative to me, but that's my personal opinion. Others love that style of music and it works for them. To each his/her own.

Yeah, it does. But then go to a Black church and listen to *that* music. Talk about emotional involvement!

48 posted on 12/07/2004 9:51:44 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Just because Gandhi or the Dali Lama don't embrace the ONE true God today, doesn't mean we can count them out just yet.

Well the Dali Lama is still alive. Gandhi is dead. Does that make a difference? If you go to your death an unbeliever don't most mainstream Protestants (no path to the father except through me, etc) think you go to hell?

Where there's life, there's hope that they (and many others) are one of God's elect (that he chose before the foundation of the earth.

So here are you saying God has already decided who to save and who to damn? Calvinism? Where does that leave salvation through Christ?

49 posted on 12/07/2004 9:55:37 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: missyme

These nondenominational churches are not good. I attended one of these "churches" and the adult members were voting on what would be considered "sins" and what would not. It seems that their beliefs are based on majority rule. These groups are more like cults waiting for someone with a strong personality to take over.


50 posted on 12/07/2004 10:04:37 AM PST by oldbrowser (You lost the election.....................Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlieOK1
I am a Baptist and strong in my Christian beliefs, but this is something that I have struggled with.

What's the struggle? God isn't a nice guy. Heaven is the most exclusive country club there is. God is a tough love Judge of All.

Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: 8 For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. 9 Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? 10 Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent? 11 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him? 12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. 13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: 25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. 26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it. 28 And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at his doctrine: 29 For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes. -- Matthew 7

51 posted on 12/07/2004 10:04:44 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I have been involved in what this writers calls emergent churches. Met in homes and schools or Seventh Day buildings.

None accepted homosexuality as anything but sin, no more or less wrong than stealing or murder.

Most Christians take serious the good stewards command of the Lord, caring for the environment is not a emergent church phenomenon.

These Emergent Church are fundamentalists, true believers in the authority of Christ and His Word, not man made doctrine. Men are the head of the house, children are central to purpose, congregations function according to the Word.

While some fringe groups may be liberal and "accepting", the real movement towards these churches is conservative in nature. This author is either ignorant or is trying to sway Christians from even visiting these Congregations.

52 posted on 12/07/2004 10:04:45 AM PST by CyberCowboy777 (We want hard, tough, seasoned leaders who will methodically destroy the people who would kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Are you saying predestination contradicts salvation through Christ?


53 posted on 12/07/2004 10:12:03 AM PST by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tares
I think he is referring to the "I am saved and now I go on living my life" mentality of many "Christians".

I see it all the time. They are saved, but you'd have to ask to know it. They are still on mashed potatoes, no red meat. No doctrine or understanding of the Word beyond Sunday school lessons and cannot answer the difficult questions.

Obedience is not an option, it is a requirement and something to strive for daily.

While works will not save you, they are a demonstration of your Faith. If you love Him you will feed His sheep.

We are to be the salt and the light. If we look and act like the world we will only blend in.
54 posted on 12/07/2004 10:19:35 AM PST by CyberCowboy777 (We want hard, tough, seasoned leaders who will methodically destroy the people who would kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maestro; CharlieOK1
"St. John 14:6 ?.................What part of,..... "NO".....don't you understand?"

What did I write that made you think I disagree with that in any way? LOL

What I wrote AFFIRMS what is written there.

I also AFFIRM this: Luke 23:42-43.

Now - did the thief know EXACTLY who he was talking to or not?

Yes he did. And he believed in Jesus BECAUSE of one thing: Matt. 16:15-17; John 10:29; 17:6

Anything there with which you disagree?

55 posted on 12/07/2004 10:23:39 AM PST by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage

Yes.


56 posted on 12/07/2004 10:27:28 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

We have several of those churches locally. One is a merger of two small churches. Very evangelical and contemporary. They seem to have eschewed politics. The UMC plant is very touchy feely, like a social club. There is a Southern Baptist plant and an RP plant. The Southern Baptist is homey and the RP is very stiff and traditional.

Of course all of them hide their denomination links. The one old-timer, an independent startup, is very conservative and growing rapidly.


57 posted on 12/07/2004 10:31:08 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Salvation implies that the door is open to all. One chooses to walk through it. What does predestination assume. That it is already decided. So why prostelitize? And more important where does that leave free will? I realize these issues were all thrashed out in the reformation and early years of colonists in America. Sadly I'm not real familiar with the arguments. I have not studied Protestant Theology either in school, nor in much depth on my own. I was raised Catholic and predestination is definately not a part of Catholic teaching.

I would be interested in being educated, but not flamed.


58 posted on 12/07/2004 10:33:14 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
You are in my area, what Church are you going to?

Crossroads? New Beginnings?

I know of a "emergent" church down I205 and one in Brush Prairie if your interested.
59 posted on 12/07/2004 10:34:22 AM PST by CyberCowboy777 (We want hard, tough, seasoned leaders who will methodically destroy the people who would kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
"Well the Dali Lama is still alive. Gandhi is dead. Does that make a difference? If you go to your death an unbeliever don't most mainstream Protestants (no path to the father except through me, etc) think you go to hell?"

Oops! My mistake. I take it back about Gandhi. LOL (At least from what I know of him before he died).

M-PI: "Where there's life, there's hope that they (and many others) are one of God's elect (that he chose before the foundation of the earth."

".....Where does that leave salvation through Christ?"

You have a lot of objective studying to do - if you're emotionally capable of it.

And please excuse me, but I only engage in debate with objective people who don't begin with a false premise subject to preconceived, ill-conceived notions.

60 posted on 12/07/2004 10:36:45 AM PST by Matchett-PI (All DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson