Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

William F. Buckley, Jr.: What Did Goldwater Mean?
National Review Online ^ | 12/10/04 | William F. Buckley, Jr.

Posted on 12/12/2004 2:19:17 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: wagglebee
I read Goldwater's biography and what struck me was how stupid the man was.

Yes, he was an anticommunist and helped revive the conservative movement. But the movement was created at the grass roots level and he was the only leader available.

He never liked Reagan and supported Nixon up and till he resigned. His '64 campaign was idiotically run and his vote against the civil rights act (well intentioned) was stupid.

As TR once said of another senator "He meant well, feebly"
21 posted on 12/12/2004 4:54:44 PM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; B4Ranch
IMHO, Goldwater's greatest contribution was in laying the foundation for Ronald Reagan. Reagan took Goldwater's principles and revitalized California and later the entire nation.

Bump! Also, I think people fail to realize that in solving the problems introduced by big government and cultural relativism poverty would diminish greatly.

I do think we need to focus on those things. We need to make sure that we aren't disadvantaging our willing American workers at the bottom of the social heap by our immigration laws, our red tape, and our taxation law.

Reagan's efforts to improve those matters translated into the boom that Clinton always claims for himself.

22 posted on 12/12/2004 5:08:03 PM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
When I read Buckley's articles, there's at least once that I have to go to the dictionary. I thought I had this one whipped then word "exegete" go me in the last paragraph. I wonder if he does this on purpose.

If the Court said it’s okay, then it’s okay.

I hear a lot of this and it concerns me a little. All the Supreme Court can do is rule on a question according to the constitutions, laws and customs of the people. It did this in Dred Scott, regardless of Lincoln's reasoning, which was correct but only indicated a minor flaw in the law regarding the transport of slaves.

What the Supreme Court can't do is rule on the mysteries of life, like when a developing child gains a human soul. It did this in Roe.

Therefore, if the Supreme court says its so, there is a definite limit to its jurisdiction.

23 posted on 12/12/2004 5:10:25 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risk

http://www.nationalcenter.org/Goldwater.html

Read the acceptance speech from the Cow Palace, prophesying the course of the next 25 years, then call him stupid. The truth is, he was a drunk and it got to his gray matter.


24 posted on 12/12/2004 5:13:21 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

I think Buckley uses obscure words to remind the leftists that you don't have to be a liberal in order to be an intellectual snob (George Will does the same thing, although not as much).


25 posted on 12/12/2004 5:14:11 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
I'm not saying Goldwater was on the wrong side or wasn't right on the big issues of the 60's or didn't have good speech writers.

But when it came to judging people and events, running a political campaign, keeping ones emotions in check, etc. - the man was a dummy.

He meant well, he surrounded himself at times with good smart people, but he was himself a weak sister.
26 posted on 12/12/2004 5:19:47 PM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Buckley does "intellectual snob" real well; he has the intelligence for it.

27 posted on 12/12/2004 5:21:25 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

From what I've heard, GWB has the intelligence (and education) to do it also; however, he realizes that his appeal is in not doing it.


28 posted on 12/12/2004 5:23:36 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
No, Goldwater never changed.

I guess his child bride may have had a little to do with his changing views....

29 posted on 12/12/2004 5:38:14 PM PST by itsahoot (There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

if you think Bush vs. MSM, Michael Moore, Rather and Soros was tough, you should have been there for Goldwater against "the consensus." As to the speech, I'm not referring to the phraseology , the province of the speech writers-- I'm talking about the content and the guts and vision to elucidate it.


30 posted on 12/12/2004 5:43:14 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KTpig

I recall people who were "on the floor" (of the Senate) at the time he was "in the cups" a lot before he took the backward turn. That's what I see of VA's Warner, too.


31 posted on 12/12/2004 6:02:29 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Goldwater was never the same after his landslide loss to LBJ in which Blacks shifted en masse from the Party of Lincoln over to the Party of FDR.Didn't that shift begin during FDR's own administration, early on therein?

ff

32 posted on 12/12/2004 6:11:39 PM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spirited

Darn, I made it through Buckley...to have you use the unfamiliar term "in the cups." Does it mean drinking, or does it have to do with his 2nd wife (who was 30 years younger)?

Not that there is anything wrong with that.


33 posted on 12/12/2004 6:23:29 PM PST by KTpig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: foreverfree
Reformatted...

Goldwater was never the same after his landslide loss to LBJ in which Blacks shifted en masse from the Party of Lincoln over to the Party of FDR.

Didn't that shift begin during FDR's own administration, early on therein?

ff

34 posted on 12/12/2004 6:29:00 PM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KTpig

Drinking habits changed.....


35 posted on 12/12/2004 6:47:07 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
I liked Goldwater, but he wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. He did have a good speechwriter, Karl Hess.
36 posted on 12/12/2004 7:17:41 PM PST by Bismark (Do you understand "fish or cut bait?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.


37 posted on 12/12/2004 7:24:06 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
"Buckley does 'intellectual snob' real well; he has the intelligence for it."

Lol, yes he does...But perhaps Buckley's bit too smart for his own good: An IQ of a thousand, the ultimate wordsmith, and someone of whom nearly NO ONE understands.

38 posted on 12/12/2004 7:25:14 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"I think Buckley uses obscure words to remind the leftists that you don't have to be a liberal in order to be an intellectual snob..."

"judicial ultramontanism"

Yeah, Bill...that's the ticket....

39 posted on 12/12/2004 7:28:15 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

I still think Reagan was the greatest President we've had, in that he moved the country right again out of a clearly moderate funk, but we have had no President willing to get things even remotely back on the right track to limiting government since.

Goldwater would have been an ideal president.

Of course, you could have guessed that from my freeper home page. :)


40 posted on 12/12/2004 7:53:21 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson