Posted on 12/16/2004 8:15:22 AM PST by OB1kNOb
If the historical society is a public body and it allows other (non-religious) groups to use the space for their meetings, it cannot exclude you from the space because you are "religious."
If this is the case, go back to the historical society and point this legal fact out to them. By excluding you from public property due to the religious nature of your group, they are violating your civil rights.
We have to start recalling/ impeaching these criminal, traitorous judges!!! Does anyone know if there is a process by which this can be done? ANYONE? Seriously! How can we get rid of these idiots?
Check http://www.lc.org/
It's Liberty Counsel, a legal organization focused on defending the religious side of these disputes (Jerry Falwell mentioned it this morning on local radio)
They have a place with frequently asked legal questions, and to request legal assistance.
This is unreal.
The time is not coming. The time has come.
Not taking a stand is taking a stand. For the side of darkness.
This is Mississippi not Pennsylvania.
ethnic intimidation??????????
You know they all somehow come to the same conclusion that these stories are suspect because they are reported by Christians.
I have seen these groups jump on similar stories here on FR before. Almost seems like they notify each other.
It pretty much is outlawed now. It`s called the infection of liberalism in this country. They were voted out of office November 2nd but for some reason they and our courts still think they are the majority in this country. Only Islam can be promoted according to liberals, much like it is in California where the California legislature mandated that all 8th graders take a 3 week course in Islam and adopt Islamic names. Isn`t that lovely? Your kid comes home one day and tells you his new name is Mohammed. Can you imagine Christianity being mandated ina California public school? The minority liberals would get their liberal press buddies to make pretend they are the majority and make their protests seem like "the country is outraged".
World Net Daily was the first place I saw the story. There is a video link as well of the protestors and how they behaved before they were arrested. According to Steven Crampton, one of the attorneys for AFA, the tape was filmed by an independent group out of San Fran, there to film OutFest. The person who filmed the protest offerred it to the AFA after hearing about the charges.
From the WND article:
The charges were: criminal conspiracy, possession of instruments of crime, reckless endangerment of another person, ethnic intimidation, riot, failure to disperse, disorderly conduct, and obstructing highways.
Here to watch the video:
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41916
Of course they'll be right back hooting and hollering in joy just as soon as cops give protesters they don't like the "wooden shampoo".
They think (I guess you can call it that) that rights can be taken from others without losing their own in the process. The logical disconnect is amusing, to say the least.
Most people on this site have absolutely no desire for a consistent policy applied to everyone. They singularly care about positive outcomes for favored groups.
Well hypocrites you've made your own bed. Now lay in it.
If this is a "Godhatesfags" type of group then we may not be getting the whole story.
I can't believe what I'm reading. What can we do to help these people?
Jesus said "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword." -- Mathew 10:34
That's ridiculous. The debate on whether sexual orientation should be a protected class or not is a completely different subject. But, no matter what a person's view on that debate is, they should clearly see that sexual orientation and ethnicity are two VERY different concepts.
You need to watch the video.
Put it on the Census. Then we will find out how few there actually are. Their political clout is based on imaginary numbers.
I remember you. You were the guy who thought it was wrong for police to arrest trespassers on private property.
I have read many articles about this incident. Try a FR search (if it's working properly) and see what you come up with.
The "Outfest" was on a public street or street, not closed off, no admission fees, totally public. The protesters either needed no permit, or obtained one. Don't remember.
They moved when the cops asked them to move. Homosexuals didn't like them, created a ruckus - up to and including shoving, yelling, spitting, pushing.
There is a lot of info about this. Try the link and see the video.
BTW, taxpayers funded at least some of the "gay" celebration. You think that's right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.