Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21 ^ | Feb 3, 2005 | Nancy Levant

Posted on 02/03/2005 10:37:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer

Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21 Nancy Levant

I keep waiting, and waiting, and waiting for Bill O’Reilly or Shaun Hannity or Oprah Winfrey or somebody…..anybody, who has daily access to the multitudes, to say the words, “Agenda 21.” I’m still waiting, and for the life of me, I don’t understand the refusal to talk about the greatest threat to America that has ever existed. However, it dawns on me that wrapping a brain around Agenda 21 requires time, effort, interest, and a lot diligence. No one told me about Agenda 21. I found it by accident on the Internet. Then I went to the U.N.’s website and read Agenda 21. From there I went to Buenos Aires, The President’s Commission of Sustainable Development, my local sustainable development commissions and planners, to local visioning commissions, ecology conglomerates, and then back to the U.N.. After about six months of reading about a whole lot of global, national, and philanthropic organizations, I started documenting and keeping running lists because, I discovered, Agenda 21 was huge, highly developed, and a done deal. “How is it,” I asked myself, “that in 50 years, I never heard of any of this before? Where were my trusted newscasters? And why hasn’t my President, or the previous Presidents, ever talked about Agenda 21, the meetings in Buenos Aires, and Agenda 21’s connections to the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and a thousand other global organizations?”

So, I kept researching the Net. And lo and behold, I finally realized that Agenda 21 would never be publicized to Americans. It really can’t be.

As my running lists were now becoming encyclopedic, I also realized that there was no way to explain Agenda 21 easily. It’s too big, profoundly sophisticated, intentionally masked and hidden by corporate agendas and ecological ideologies that are, themselves, exploited by corporate agendas. But more than that, I realized that for Americans to understand Agenda 21, they would have to come to terms with a truth that, I fear, they won’t believe. What would that truth be? Let me try to say it in one sentence: Agenda 21 is the end of America.

As I read that sentence I think, “Well, Nancy, now everyone is going to think you are an extremist and no one will believe anything you say from now on. Everyone knows there can be no end to America….”

But unfortunately, my dear Americans, there can be an end to America, for America is a way of life. The place on Earth - where we are – the beautiful and bountiful lands between Canada and Mexico, might retain the name of “The United States of America,” but I’m not even sure that that is a given. If you believe even half of Agenda 21 and it’s dealings with the World Trade Organization, The World Bank, The President’s Commission on Sustainable Development, The Commission on Global Governance, The World Conference on Global Governance, The Millennium Project, The Court of Criminal Justice, The Nature Conservancy, The World Summit on Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, AND the “visioning” training and manipulation of American people, then you realize what has happened right under our noses over the past 35 years and without one national personality ever mentioning Agenda 21.

So, let me offer a list of website addresses to help readers research for themselves. I suggest you take notes and collect new website addresses. I believe that, as Americans, we owe it to our history and our sense of ourselves, to do the following:

· Read Agenda 21. If you read the other information via the web addresses in this article, you will wrap your brain around Agenda 21. It’s unbelievable and it’s dastardly, because not one politician or national media outlet has had the guts to tell us what was being taken from us.

· Pass your knowledge on to others. Don’t stew and be paralyzed. Take your knowledge to churches, civic organizations, and any other groups or individuals you can, and resolve yourselves to spread the news. Have an Anti-Agenda 21 Parade or Day to draw attention to the cause. Without fail, it’s the most important thing you will ever do in your lives as patriotic people. Write to your representatives and tell them you know what they have hidden, and that their manipulations of American citizens are shameful. Do it.

· Try so very hard to home school your children. Public schools are governmental institutions embroiled in Agenda 21 and its plans for the United States and our children. As you read and study Agenda 21, you will see it alive, well, and operating most obviously in the public schools. You will also see it clearly in the newest communities in all states across the country. Agenda 21 is everywhere, and it wants your children’s intellects and value systems as well as your land and land rights.

· Finally, teach your children about Agenda 21, what it is, and what it is doing to their country. Children have unique wisdoms at every age. Teach them truths so that they can faithfully and fearlessly speak truths. They must understand what is happening in their country. They cannot fight hidden and masked manipulations if they don’t understand how and where they operate.

Now is the time for Americans to help Americans. We cannot fight the loss of our rights unless we understand the game, and most Americans are totally unaware of what is happening to them and their communities. However, I do believe that the bulk of American people “sense” that something is amiss. Let’s commit to them, our children, and our futures. Let’s spread the news and make the media and politicians talk. They have counted on our stupidity, our silence, and our laziness. They have even counted on us not really caring.

We have to remember – it’s our government. It does not belong to politicians. They work for us. Unfortunately, they have not done that, and furthermore, they have advanced a worldwide mission without our knowledge, our votes, or even our opinions. So I say, one town at a time, here we come, and any elected official found to be complicit or a silent player in the Agenda 21 game needs to go.

Agenda 21 – Learn All About It

Basic Explanation of birth of Agenda 21

Timeline of development of world governance and agenda 21

Key players of Millennium Project

HABITAT II – U.N. Housing Requirements


Global Governance – key international players

Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Millennium Goals Project

Rocky Mountain Institute

Sustainable Development in the United States – natural resources goals:

Henry Lamb

The Sustainable Development Institute

American Policy Center – Tom DeWeese invasive species legislation: the Wildlands Project, Smart Growth Project

American Farmland Trust & the Nature Conservancy & OSU

Human Settlements – goals ***Education for sustainability: An Agenda Action United Nations dissolves USA Sovereignty Visioning Training-How To Re-Envision People and Communities People and their organizations and schemes: How to force visioning upon the public as quoted from the United Nation’s Agenda 21 document: World Summit on Sustainable Development

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 21tinfoilsalute; agenda; agenda21; aliens; blackhelicopter; chickenlittle; contrails; development; ducttape; environment; humanhabitats; itspeople; jbs; landuse; milleniumsummit; msm; nwo; propertyrights; sovereignty; soylentgreen; sustainable; theyrecoming; tinfoil; tinfoil21; totakemeawayhaha; un; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 781-795 next last
To: Free2BeMe
Very weird indeed.

World domination by the Jews, Hell, Koffee anus hates Jews. It's the UN that is the problem.

101 posted on 02/04/2005 12:41:19 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Survivors Sue UN for "Complicity" in Rwanda Genocide
The United Nations is being sued, for the first time in its history, for alleged complicity in the crime of genocide. Lawyers are instituting a case on behalf of two Rwandan women whose families died during the 1994 genocide in which 800,000, mostly Tutsi people, were slaughtered by Hutus.

The women, the widow of a former Rwandan supreme court judge and the sister of a Tutsi former cabinet minister, accuse UN soldiers who were meant to defend their families of either handing them over to their killers or running away.

The UN secretary general, Kofi Annan, has expressed regret, and admitted UN failings in responding to the genocide.

--Karen MacGregor

In its preamble, the U.N. Charter says it was formed to "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war." The truth is, that the U.N. has done more to prevent peace, than to prevent war. In its entire history, the U.N. Security Council has voted to authorize military intervention only three times: in Korea, in the 1991 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, and in the 2002 intervention in Afghanistan – all at the request of the United States.

While hundreds of thousands of people were being hacked to death in Rwanda, the U.N. talked, but did nothing. While ethnic cleansing was occurring in the Balkans, the U.N. talked, but did nothing. The chronology of slaughter during the life of the U.N. is inescapable evidence of the U.N.'s abject failure to "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war."

--Henry Lamb

102 posted on 02/04/2005 12:42:31 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

First destroy the family stucture than you can get away with anything. We are fighting with each other like the Arabs use Israel to divert attention from the real problems. I know it's all for the good of the planet but it's the way they are going about doing it that is disturbing.

103 posted on 02/04/2005 12:42:59 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
It shows. Your posts and opinions are appreciated!

I'm glad he posted this or I would have never known about Agenda 21.

104 posted on 02/04/2005 12:43:48 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Good post! Thanks for the info, I am adding it to my research notes.

105 posted on 02/04/2005 12:44:06 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

And yes, I've paid attention to recent Islamofascist leadership moves and some of their other alliances. It's also very noticeable that our Navy is and has been hard at work in those areas (nothing class'd, but in the world civilian news for many months).

History involving the Protocols of the Elders of Zion Nazi forgery figures very much into that, too. It and similar literature are being republished in some of those areas. ...don't know what it has to do with the socialist land grab racket, though.

106 posted on 02/04/2005 12:45:28 AM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
we had foreign jets in our skies almost immediately afterwards.

Those were AWACs planes provided by NATO. I just can't see how that was so troubling.

You do realize that the German Luftwaffe has been co-located with the Army at Fort Bliss for something like forty years?

I refuse to believe that the UN and toads like Ted Turner will be able to overcome our innate Americaness. I don't deny that there are groups who seek the outcomes many of you fear. I just don't believe they can win. I don't think they'll even come close.
107 posted on 02/04/2005 12:45:50 AM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
"911...I do recall we had foreign jets in our skies almost immediately afterwards. Not American jets. For some reason I never felt safe with our air sovereignty being given to foreigners for that period of time. I know I would have felt better to have our own Navy jets guarding our country."

Don't worry, they were Cayman Island jets. They came with the package deal with the UN for the Liberty Bell.

108 posted on 02/04/2005 12:46:49 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

Are you kidding ? The US governmet is in on it.

109 posted on 02/04/2005 12:47:40 AM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Do current moves regarding that Treaty have anything to do with China's obvious efforts to own certain ocean spots (trade/military routes)?

110 posted on 02/04/2005 12:48:05 AM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The UN is a black hole. Everything goes in....nothing goes out. Look at the scandal with the O.F.F. program. Koffee is untouchable. Millions of humans have been slaughtered. Billions of dollars have been stolen and he walks free.
111 posted on 02/04/2005 12:48:49 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

I was hoping W. would be more like his mother than his father.

Bush disappointed me the day he made the speech to the UN saying they were irrelevant and in the same breadth he committed us to UNESCO. I also didn't like the fact that we had foreign planes in our skies after 9/11 for months. It still galls me that the UN was invited to monitor our elections. OSCE was created by the UN to monitor elections.

112 posted on 02/04/2005 12:48:50 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
I think his point is the book was a HUGE lie that people believed because they were kooks, so we're kooks believing this about the UN. He's comparing the people who believed that anti semantic trash to the people who believe the UN wants to destroy the U.S.
113 posted on 02/04/2005 12:49:29 AM PST by Free2BeMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Re: After about six months of reading... oops, is Nancy Levant's story.

My story is different, but I certainly appreciate your appreciation!

114 posted on 02/04/2005 12:50:45 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Actually, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was a forgery made by the Czar's secret police.

The root of many later conspiracy theories of powerful groups attempting to dominate the world through deceptive means.

I'm sorry, but our national story doesn't end with us as UN chattel. We've beaten far worse then that bunch of dopes.

115 posted on 02/04/2005 12:51:49 AM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Yes they do. In the paperwork I have it states ...."Empower rogue nations such as China".

Senator Lugar is involved in getting L.O.S.T. passed.

116 posted on 02/04/2005 12:52:18 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Free2BeMe
Hell, he slammed me and I didn't even know it.

This is real. I cannot thank hedgetrimmer enough for bringing this to my attention.

I can't believe I had never heard of it before.

Didn't they call the Wright Bros. kooks for saying they could fly?

117 posted on 02/04/2005 12:56:20 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

read Dave Kopel's reports on it -

many live links within the story and a must read.
Kopel is not a Bush supporter... at least he wasn't in "00. not sure now..

The two-week conference was the result of General Assembly Resolution 54/54, adopted Dec. 15, 1999. According to the U.N. itself, the conference "was convened to address the increasing threat to human security from the spread of small arms and light weapons and their illegal trade." Note that "illegal trade" is only one part of the threat. "The spread of small arms" is considered a threat in itself.

At the conference, speaker after speaker made it clear that "excessive" quantities of guns (i.e., any guns in civilian hands) was a problem in itself, separate from the issue of illegal trade. Rey Pagtakhan, the Canadian secretary of state, condemned "The excessive and destabilizing accumulation and uncontrolled spread of small arms."

Ireland's U.N. delegate declared, "States must stop exporting of small arms and light weapons to all except other governments. All states must suppress private ownership of small arms and light weapons."
Likewise pushing for severe domestic restrictions was the "Eminent Persons Group" (no kidding) consisting of 23 anti-gun busybodies. American members included U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein and Robert McNamara, who followed his tenure as the worst defense secretary (leading the U.S. into what he knew was an unwinnable war in Vietnam) with an even more destructive, albeit quieter, tenure as president of the World Bank, in which he shoveled aid and loans at third-world kleptocracies which used the money to oppress their subject peoples. The indigenous victims of the World Bank/kleptocracy alliance are the kind of people whom the Eminent Persons Group does not want to have guns.


U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan equated small arms to nuclear weapons or chemical warfare weapons — thus demonizing them, and implying that they should never be in civilian hands. He said that small arms are "'weapons of mass destruction' in terms of the carnage they cause." Annan compared the current campaign against small arms to the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) — whose objective, of course, is total prohibition. The ICBL, by the way, proclaims that it is about "much more than the eventual elimination of landmines", and is furious at the Bush administration's stance at the U.N. Small Arms Conference

118 posted on 02/04/2005 12:56:28 AM PST by sdpatriot ("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
Part of it was lifted from the French satire,"Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" but it was written as Propaganda to flame antisemitism.
119 posted on 02/04/2005 12:57:32 AM PST by Free2BeMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
Then why give the UN a toe-hold? They need to know that we won't stand for it...well, some of us won't.

Never underestimate your enemy. That is a critical mistake.

120 posted on 02/04/2005 12:59:24 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 781-795 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson