Skip to comments.Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21
Posted on 02/03/2005 10:37:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21 Nancy Levant
I keep waiting, and waiting, and waiting for Bill OReilly or Shaun Hannity or Oprah Winfrey or somebody ..anybody, who has daily access to the multitudes, to say the words, Agenda 21. Im still waiting, and for the life of me, I dont understand the refusal to talk about the greatest threat to America that has ever existed. However, it dawns on me that wrapping a brain around Agenda 21 requires time, effort, interest, and a lot diligence. No one told me about Agenda 21. I found it by accident on the Internet. Then I went to the U.N.s website and read Agenda 21. From there I went to Buenos Aires, The Presidents Commission of Sustainable Development, my local sustainable development commissions and planners, to local visioning commissions, ecology conglomerates, and then back to the U.N.. After about six months of reading about a whole lot of global, national, and philanthropic organizations, I started documenting and keeping running lists because, I discovered, Agenda 21 was huge, highly developed, and a done deal. How is it, I asked myself, that in 50 years, I never heard of any of this before? Where were my trusted newscasters? And why hasnt my President, or the previous Presidents, ever talked about Agenda 21, the meetings in Buenos Aires, and Agenda 21s connections to the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and a thousand other global organizations?
So, I kept researching the Net. And lo and behold, I finally realized that Agenda 21 would never be publicized to Americans. It really cant be.
As my running lists were now becoming encyclopedic, I also realized that there was no way to explain Agenda 21 easily. Its too big, profoundly sophisticated, intentionally masked and hidden by corporate agendas and ecological ideologies that are, themselves, exploited by corporate agendas. But more than that, I realized that for Americans to understand Agenda 21, they would have to come to terms with a truth that, I fear, they wont believe. What would that truth be? Let me try to say it in one sentence: Agenda 21 is the end of America.
As I read that sentence I think, Well, Nancy, now everyone is going to think you are an extremist and no one will believe anything you say from now on. Everyone knows there can be no end to America .
But unfortunately, my dear Americans, there can be an end to America, for America is a way of life. The place on Earth - where we are the beautiful and bountiful lands between Canada and Mexico, might retain the name of The United States of America, but Im not even sure that that is a given. If you believe even half of Agenda 21 and its dealings with the World Trade Organization, The World Bank, The Presidents Commission on Sustainable Development, The Commission on Global Governance, The World Conference on Global Governance, The Millennium Project, The Court of Criminal Justice, The Nature Conservancy, The World Summit on Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, AND the visioning training and manipulation of American people, then you realize what has happened right under our noses over the past 35 years and without one national personality ever mentioning Agenda 21.
So, let me offer a list of website addresses to help readers research for themselves. I suggest you take notes and collect new website addresses. I believe that, as Americans, we owe it to our history and our sense of ourselves, to do the following:
· Read Agenda 21. If you read the other information via the web addresses in this article, you will wrap your brain around Agenda 21. Its unbelievable and its dastardly, because not one politician or national media outlet has had the guts to tell us what was being taken from us.
· Pass your knowledge on to others. Dont stew and be paralyzed. Take your knowledge to churches, civic organizations, and any other groups or individuals you can, and resolve yourselves to spread the news. Have an Anti-Agenda 21 Parade or Day to draw attention to the cause. Without fail, its the most important thing you will ever do in your lives as patriotic people. Write to your representatives and tell them you know what they have hidden, and that their manipulations of American citizens are shameful. Do it.
· Try so very hard to home school your children. Public schools are governmental institutions embroiled in Agenda 21 and its plans for the United States and our children. As you read and study Agenda 21, you will see it alive, well, and operating most obviously in the public schools. You will also see it clearly in the newest communities in all states across the country. Agenda 21 is everywhere, and it wants your childrens intellects and value systems as well as your land and land rights.
· Finally, teach your children about Agenda 21, what it is, and what it is doing to their country. Children have unique wisdoms at every age. Teach them truths so that they can faithfully and fearlessly speak truths. They must understand what is happening in their country. They cannot fight hidden and masked manipulations if they dont understand how and where they operate.
Now is the time for Americans to help Americans. We cannot fight the loss of our rights unless we understand the game, and most Americans are totally unaware of what is happening to them and their communities. However, I do believe that the bulk of American people sense that something is amiss. Lets commit to them, our children, and our futures. Lets spread the news and make the media and politicians talk. They have counted on our stupidity, our silence, and our laziness. They have even counted on us not really caring.
We have to remember its our government. It does not belong to politicians. They work for us. Unfortunately, they have not done that, and furthermore, they have advanced a worldwide mission without our knowledge, our votes, or even our opinions. So I say, one town at a time, here we come, and any elected official found to be complicit or a silent player in the Agenda 21 game needs to go.
Agenda 21 Learn All About It
Basic Explanation of birth of Agenda 21 http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/basic_info/unced.html
Timeline of development of world governance and agenda 21 http://www.sovereignty.net/timeline.html
Key players of Millennium Project http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/tf6interim.pdf
HABITAT II U.N. Housing Requirements http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html
Global Governance key international players http://www.sovereignty.net/p/gov/gganalysis.htm
Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Millennium Goals Project http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/about/director/
Rocky Mountain Institute http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid61.php
Sustainable Development in the United States natural resources goals: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm
Henry Lamb http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/strong.html
The Sustainable Development Institute http://www.susdev.org/
American Policy Center Tom DeWeese http://americanpolicy.org/ invasive species legislation: http://americanpolicy.org/prop/main.htm the Wildlands Project, Smart Growth Project http://americanpolicy.org/un/darkside.htm
American Farmland Trust & the Nature Conservancy & OSU http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/articles5/rustling_america_in_ohio.htm
Human Settlements goals http://www.nlihc.org/mahn/habitat.htm ***Education for sustainability: An Agenda Action http://www.gcrio.org/edu/pcsd/toc.html United Nations dissolves USA Sovereignty http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a33916.htm Visioning Training-How To Re-Envision People and Communities www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/rlc/comm/outcome.htm People and their organizations and schemes: http://www.southern-style.com/conspiracy_of_the_left.htm How to force visioning upon the public as quoted from the United Nations Agenda 21 document: http://doncasey.home.mindspring.com/vision.htm World Summit on Sustainable Development http://www.minambiente.it/Sito/settori_azione/pia/docs/forum_chairman_summary.pdf
Yep, the term "Agenda 21" and the "U.N." involvement typically brings out that response. However, many of the components of this "agenda" are clearly taking place across the country.
Have you read any of the information that has been posted on this thread?
This is a tangible flesh and blood boogie man.
I did that last night. This thread is a keeper.
Is he still alive? I haven't heard a thing about him in ten years!
Fr. Malachi Martin,
Hey, that's tellin' him! Ha ha! Great rebuttal.
Why are you telling me?
>>Treaties don't override the Constitution. But you and a bunch of liberals believe it does.<<
Yes they do by our voluntary signing of the treaty we forfiet the protections of the Constitution!
If Hillary manages to be president (somehow), and Bill is head of the UN - America is really doomed.
If people think that's far out .. just read Bill Sammon's book, AT ANY COST - HOW AL GORE TRIED TO STEAL THE ELECTION. Once you read that book .. there will be no doubt in your mind that the Clintons are willing to do anything to destroy what America is.
I will go so far as to suggest they would perpetrate an attack upon America (because they have already accused Bush of doing that) in order to declare martial law - suspend elections - confiscate weapons, etc. I know that's harsh .. but if Hillary is already castigating Bush for "overreaching, hubris and arrogance", you can be sure that is exactly what she would do.
However, at the rate of destruction the dems are perpetrating upon themselves .. they will not be in power for at least 40-50 years. I might be long gone by then so I won't care.
wait a minute...let put on my fart bell cap, aw, ... thanks!
Hey hedge. If you notice, there are a lot of posters on the forum who are new, that seem to frequently deride those long time FReepers who are more inclined to look at the facts. I can't decide if they are leftist plants who are just here to disrupt and confuse, or if they are just naive and clueless.
Your observations are right on the money. I think there is a lot of subversion going on in this forum right now. Fortunately FReepers are armed with cogent reasoning and the truth.
What a brilliant analysis of the material on this post. Can I have your autograph, professor?
What does signing a treaty do if not place restrictions on our "independence" and "freedoms" to do as we wish?
Where do you think gun control comes from? Read the UN Charter before you continue.
Agenda has been going on for 50 years with basically nothing to show for it.
How you doing, hedgetrimmer. Here's a court decision from your neck of the woods that people might be interested in -
It appears something has been afoot for 30 years or so and a few of us are just hearing about it.
Here is another one. Signed up in November.
You need to keep reading, Sir.
Stock up on your ammo, now! I don't believe black helicopter crap like this, but there's absolutely no reason to discredit it. Every movie I can think of that falls in the future shows a "Unified Earth Initiative" type government.
Also, isn't there a UN mandate on the docket this year for a worldwide ban on small arms? What happened to the Constitution of the United States? Thank GOD for W!
Have you even asked yourself why presummably sane Americans would elect federal representatives who are members of the DEMOCRAT SOCIALIST (formerly COMMUNIST) PARTY ..??
I guess that might explain why agreements are made with organizations which support Communism and Socialism.
That answers (a) (b) and (c)
(d) they're communists or socialists - who lie for a living
(e) President Clinton has a DEMOCRAT COMMUNIST for a wife
(f) We are the RICHEST COUNTRY ON THE EARTH
(g) Since Senator McCain supported John Kerry - I would never call him a "patriot" - for America anyway. And .. President Bush DOESN'T WRITE LEGISLATION - THE CONGRESS DOES .. whine to them.
(h) The conservative movement in this country - proves that we are no longer walking in that direction. But .. everything cannot be undone overnight.
And .. I beg to differ with you .. we are NOT "dissolving our sovereignty" - not by a long shot.
I do not support the Law of the Sea Treaty - not at all. But the American public does not get to vote on this. If you want to rant and scream - you need to be sending this info to the people who will get to vote - the Congress!!
I am sure I am not interested at all in what kind of headgear you choose to wear.
You're correct .. and that's why it's so important that Hillary never be allowed to be president and Bill never be allowed to be Secy Genl of the UN.
A) Empowering communities
3.7. Sustainable development must be achieved at every level of society. Peoples' organizations, women's groups and non-governmental organizations are important sources of innovation and action at the local level and have a strong interest and proven ability to promote sustainable livelihoods. Governments, in cooperation with appropriate international and non-governmental organizations, should support a community-driven approach to sustainability, which would include, inter alia:
(a) Empowering women through full participation in decision-making;
(b) Respecting the cultural integrity and the rights of indigenous people and their communities;
OK, given that points (a) and (b) are in direct conflict with each other in most poor countries, just how does the author of this document expect these things to occur?
>>>I might be long gone by then so I won't care.<<
Your kids will certainly have fond memories of you, won't they>
Follow this up with some 'impartial' coverage of the heroic Greenpeace trying to interfere with a U.S. Navy exercise, as narrated by the whale-huggers themselves. Watch the fearless battlers for the environment against the mean old military and their water cannons.
Agenda? What agenda?
I'm sure you'll get along, idiots often agree with other idiots.
>>In this precedent-setting case, the Court of Federal Claims ruled that four California water districts must pay $16.7 million to farmers for water the government took for fish.<<
I'm confident the World Court would overturn that decision, given the chance.
Hmmmmm? They'll be with me ..!! For I gave them the real truth when they were children!
Excuse me .. your holier than thou attitude is very condescending. When I said I would not be here - that's because I believe Christians will be gone when all this mess happens in America.
Why do I believe that. Because it's the prayers of the Christians that keep America on the right path. When the prayers of Christians are no longer supporting America - even you don't want to be here.
I don't intend to be here. I have made my choice.
President Bush DOESN'T WRITE LEGISLATION - THE CONGRESS DOES
True! But he does sign it, does he not?
Until he signs, is it law?
Not when I went school it wasn't.
Have there been changes?
If you want to rant and scream - you need to be sending this info to the people who will get to vote - the Congress!!
Apparently you don't follow my posts. I do send it and spend quite a bit of time on the phone with them.
Are you getting upset beccause you are beginning to see that our President is involved in this? No need to get upset, the last six Presidents have been working for it, just some harder than others.
Because I said it earlier on the thread!
>>And .. I beg to differ with you .. we are NOT "dissolving our sovereignty" - not by a long shot.<<
You explain to all of why we are NOT "dissolving our sovereignty" when we sign a treaty.
As a parent YOUR responsibility is to keep fighting, not sit on your butt and relax when the enemy is still at your door.
Hey pbrown. I was just commenting on what I see, which is that there are a LOT of new posters and so many of them are fringe-like. At least as FReepers they are. They all seem to want to roast Bush over immigration, think the U.N. is filled with fine upstanding "leaders," and that Islam is just misunderstood. They frequently posit that "hey, Hillary might not be so bad if she's tough on immigration," wink-wink.
Just look at how rabid this A Balrog of Morgoth guy is. He just absolutely sure the UN is a wonderful orgarnization.
No .. I'm getting upset apparently because your questions seem to imply that I'm responsible for the mess we're in .. or that I somehow have the responsibility for fixing the mess we're in.
I'm telling you .. if you're going to elect COMMUNISTS into your govt you have to expect you're going to get legislation which supports their point of view.
I don't help elect those types of people - and I actively work against their election. That's my part - and that's the best I can do. I call, I write letters (yes snail mail) to 18 of our senators and I basically told them off; I email. To seemingly hold me responsible for what these COMMUNISTS in the UN and the US govt are doing is just foolish.
We'll be by to pick you up shortly. Please do not run, as we can track you via the bug implanted in your nasal cavity.
Have you heard of the LOST treaty that was defeated in the Reagan administration, defeated again last year? It is being brought up again pushed by senator Lugar. It includes a global tax efectively. Henry Lamb's last article quoted our new secretary of state wanting it passed and Bush has said he would like to see it passed.
You may want to stick your head in the sand while the UN trys to pass aglobal tax, but I for one won't.
I don't agree with Bush on immigration. It is wrong.
Here you go insinuating that I'm not doing anything.
What do you know ..?? I take care of my mom who is 92 years old and suffers from demenia. The rest of the time, I go to school to learn a new trade because I need to have extra income. I'm writing a book. I run the San Diego Chapter of FR - although we're not really that active at the moment - but I'm sure we'll gear up as we get closer to 2006.
If you call that "sitting on my butt" and "relaxing" .. you're in la la land.
I have seen maps where the sustainable development crew have divided the whole west coast into areas for humans and the rest to be returned to nature. The scope of their plans is stunning. They want you to eat mass produced foods (think Soylent Green) with little or no animal product and live in multi-family dwellings. In other words they want to herd the people and let the animals run free.
A treaty does not give up out sovereignty. I don't know where you get that from .. but you need to investigate that assumption.
That was harsh.