Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Zap Dad Accused Of Stealing Salad At Chuck E. Cheese
newsnet5.com ^

Posted on 03/02/2005 7:09:34 AM PST by esryle

AURORA, Colo. -- Aurora police have reviewed a weekend incident in which a man accused of stealing salad from a Chuck E. Cheese salad bar was hit with a stun gun twice by officers and said that proper procedures were followed.

The incident began at 4:05 p.m. Sunday when officers were called to the restaurant on a report of a larceny in progress.

Police talked to the Chuck E. Cheese manager, who told them that a customer had refused to show proof that he had paid for food. The manager said the man was seen "loading" his plate at the salad bar.

The officers confronted Danon Gale, 29, who was at the restaurant with his children, aged 3 and 7. Patrons said the popular kids pizza parlor was packed with children and families at the time.

According to police, Gale was asked to step outside to discuss the incident.

"According to witnesses (Gale) refused to cooperate with police and a struggle ensued," said Larry Martinez, a police spokesman. He said that Gale became argumentative and shoved one of the officers, a fact disputed by another patron.

"One of the officers kept poking the gentleman in the chest," Felicia Mayo told the Rocky Mountain News.

She was there with her 7-year-old son. She told the newspaper that Gale told the officer "You don't have to do that." She said Gale never put his hands on the officer who was confronting him

The argument escalated until Gale was shoved into the lap of Mayo's sister, who was sitting two booths away, holding a 10-month-old baby. That's when police pulled out a Taser stun gun to subdue him.

"They beat this man in front of all these kids then Tased him in my sister's lap," Mayo told the newspaper. "They had no regard for the effect this would have on the kids. This is Chuck E. Cheese, you know."

Gale's two children were "screaming and hollering and crying" as Gale was hit two times with the stun gun.

Police arrested Gale as his children and other customers watched. They took him outside, leaving his children inside the restaurant.

Gale was arrested for investigation of disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and trespassing.

His two children were picked up by a relative.

The manager of the restaurant declined comment and Gale said he couldn't talk about it, after hiring an attorney.

An Aurora Police spokesman said that the sergeant on the scene wrote a report on the incident and forwarded it to his commander who determined that proper police procedures were followed relating to the use of the Taser gun .


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; cheese; chewnscrew; chuck; chuckecheese; dinendash; donutwatch; food; lawenforcement; police; restaurant; salad; taser; tazer; theft; waronsalad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-552 next last
To: chuckwalla

LOLOL


301 posted on 03/02/2005 10:16:29 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff

Thanks. To answer your question...If the "witness" story is correct, then they are falsifying their report that he was resisting and it's certainly abuse of power to use a taser to zap someone while they are sitting on a woman with a baby...wouldn't you think? I'm not willing to condemn the police without a better picture of what really happened. In particular, this account doesn't sound right. The woman makes the police sound...well, very unpolice like. So I won't be rushing to conclusions, but if this is really the way it happened then they were out of line.


302 posted on 03/02/2005 10:16:46 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl

I believe that the proper taser policy was followed. BUT, the officers should have never let the incident rise to that level. The perp became agitated to the point whereas the cops were right in the using of the taser, but any cop worth his salt should have been able to talk him, or at least drag this guy, outside and away from the other patrons.


303 posted on 03/02/2005 10:20:01 AM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All

What amazes me about this story is that the police showed up before the guy could eat the salad and leave...Where my business is you have to have a real physical disturbance or weapon involved or you will be waiting at least an hour for the police, if you called dispatch and said someone was stealing a salad they would probably give you an estimated time of arrival of next Tuesday...

My first thought is exessive force was used...apparently he was asked to step outside and discuss the incident, not told to leave the premises or he would be arrested for trespassing...videotapes may be telling...

It will be interesting to follow this story and see where the truth lies...kinda like the cops who shot the family dog when it jumped out of the car after the family was taken out of the car at gunpoint because the guy left his wallet on the roof of the car when he left a restaurant in Tennessee...

Take a look at the poll on the news site..kinda interesting


304 posted on 03/02/2005 10:20:59 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Graycliff didn't claim he was. The point being that the police were called because of the dispute over the larceny was not being resolved civilly, perhaps because the alleged thief was a Me-ocrat who felt entitled to other people's property and rights.

Try again. There was an ACCUSATION of thief so the comment about "you approve of theft" was silly. If the police were unable to charge him with theft - it is likely he did not commit theft unless you believe people are guilty until proved innocent.

Your statement has very little to do with the known facts (you have filled a lot in from your imagination). There was an accusation of theft yet the police did not find enough evidence to charge the man.

The man could have come up with a receipt, or opened his wallet to pay for the salad, but he chose not to for whatever reason or lack thereof.

When the man says jump, you better say "how high"

I read you loud and clear.

305 posted on 03/02/2005 10:22:40 AM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: esryle

Actually I wish they would 'taze' all thieves. I hate thieves.


306 posted on 03/02/2005 10:22:42 AM PST by zoobee (If you can't feed em...don't breed em. Men....don't want kids? Don't have sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

Funny ! We'll get to 500 posts easy.


307 posted on 03/02/2005 10:22:49 AM PST by SalukiLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
You could just let it go - but what do you do when he figures out he can get freebies, and shows up the NEXT day?

Any establishment reserves the right to refuse service and could do so the following day. One "simple" incident isn't worth all this bad publicity!

But, in all honesty, have you ever been to CEC? The food is S.A.D. Maybe he couldn't digest the cardboard pizza and wanted a salad. Maybe he paid for a salad and was feeding his kids with it. I'm sure they ordered a pizza, which is pretty much worthless, and thought they were entitled to a salad. Who knows - maybe the guy thought the salad bar was free and couldn't understand that it wasn't?

It was a simple misunderstanding, I'm sure, that sparked the whole thing, but it just shouldn't have gone down this way.

308 posted on 03/02/2005 10:23:40 AM PST by arizonarachel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
You don't know that for a fact, nor what actually transpired between them. But since everyone else is idly speculating and conjecturing . . .
309 posted on 03/02/2005 10:25:08 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You don't know that for a fact

Then why did he ask for a receipt?

310 posted on 03/02/2005 10:26:09 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
You believe everything the press writes?

No,,you?

Now, about that information you have which didn't come from the press and which you claim proves there is no dispute as to the facts of what occurred?

Please enlighten me.

311 posted on 03/02/2005 10:26:17 AM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
FYI, the CC restaurant here in my area of California has one entrance/exit, with a roped station for hand-stamping and checking of hand-stamps. The ink is invisible, but is seen under black light.

You eat at Chuck E. Cheese? I feel bad for you Californians who can't get a decent pizza. Of course, y'all do have In and Out Burger which is better than any burger joint here in the east.

312 posted on 03/02/2005 10:26:41 AM PST by jmc813 (Fiesta in the making at the Moontower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
If the "witness" story is correct, then they are falsifying their report that he was resisting and it's certainly abuse of power to use a taser to zap someone while they are sitting on a woman with a baby...wouldn't you think?

Who should we beleive? The Police State or a citizen?

313 posted on 03/02/2005 10:28:01 AM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Bushforlife
You cite a lot of things which are not in dispute,,,and then a bunch of things which are.

So, no bottom line is possible. The facts are in dispute. His cooperation or lack thereof is in dispute.

Unless you are privy to some knowledge that no one else here has, if so, please share it.

314 posted on 03/02/2005 10:31:20 AM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Yes, I endured one recently, for the sake of some nephews and neices who seemed to enjoy their time there. Luckily there were no Me-ocratic customers out with a chip on their shoulders about how they have all the rights which no one else does.


315 posted on 03/02/2005 10:33:37 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff
It's just like the HamBurgler - but different.


316 posted on 03/02/2005 10:33:47 AM PST by Dashing Dasher (Once you lose your fear, you become the people you once envied....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
Aurora, Colorado is not too far from Littleton, where the police cowered behind their cars rather than face down Klebold and Harris during their killing spree at Columbine High School six years ago. Do Denver area cops take aggressive action only in situations where there is no risk to them, as was the case with this unarmed civilian in a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant? Or perhaps these LEOs regard petty larceny as a more serious crime than homicide? It's hard to tell if we are dealing with KGB wannabes or modern day Barney Fifes.
317 posted on 03/02/2005 10:34:02 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
The Police State or a citizen?

Police officers aren't citizens too?

Fair-minded people don't make snap decisions about credibility based on simplistic labels they stick on people.

318 posted on 03/02/2005 10:34:34 AM PST by JCEccles (If Jimmy Carter were a country, he'd be Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

so USING a taser, poking the man in the chest, is all ok, and all this over a salad ,I dont know where your from ,but here, IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the worst the cops and the manager should have done, was issued a citation, there is a reason we have courts for minor infractions of the law ,and that is to keep cops and over zealous managers from pulling out real guns, like I sayed I dont know where your from.


319 posted on 03/02/2005 10:34:37 AM PST by douglas1 (MY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That seems a polite way of asking an alleged thief to prove his version of events, and indeed, is the whole reason why receipts are printed in the first place. If everyone were honest then a person's word would be proof enough.
320 posted on 03/02/2005 10:35:31 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 541-552 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson