Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather climbing down from the pinnacle
Houston Chronicle ^ | March 6, 2005 | MIKE MCDANIEL

Posted on 03/06/2005 8:27:35 AM PST by Dog Gone

NEW YORK - Dan Rather, gracious and in good spirits, points with pride to an old map of Houston hanging in the corner of his office.

As his anchorman career comes to a close this week, he is fully aware of the significance his hometown has meant to his long and storied life. After 24 years on the job, he steps down Wednesday from his job as managing editor and anchor of the CBS Evening News.

Speaking a week before his sign-off, Rather is coatless but looks dapper in his striped tie and suspenders. His hair is mostly salt with a hint of pepper. His face is lined with the creases earned in his 73 years.

Perhaps he's earned more than his share these last six months, since his Sept. 8 report about George W. Bush's tenure in the Texas Air National Guard aired on 60 Minutes Wednesday. The report immediately came under scrutiny, with bloggers and critics arguing that the memos on which it was partly based were fraudulent.

"Memogate," as the resulting crisis has been coined, has plagued CBS News ever since, a lightning rod for the conservatives who say the media exudes a liberal bias.

"Listen, I've made every mistake in the book at least twice," Rather says, "and I'm very much aware of how short I've fallen and how often."

Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer called the report "the most blindingly partisan bungle in recent journalistic history."

Rather initially stood by the report. Twelve days after it ran, he issued an apology. He's been tight-lipped about it since.

Rather's is the most public face of that report, and his many critics think he championed it. An internal investigation came down hard on CBS but spared Rather and CBS News President Andrew Heyward.

"This is my personal view, but there are two things that have not gotten the attention they deserve," Rather says. "One, this panel found that whatever mistakes were made, they were not born out of political bias. No. 2, after spending four months and $5 million trying to establish that the memos were 'forgeries,' as so many have called them, the panel was unable to do that.

"I think it's fair enough to say that the documents weren't conclusively authenticated. I've acknowledged that, said I'm sorry and taken steps to see it doesn't happen again."

To an outsider, the most striking thing about the second floor of CBS News' headquarters on 57th Street is how dark and quiet it is. Few people roam the halls, and many offices sit empty, giving the place a ghostly feel.

RESOURCES


PAINTING WITH LANGUAGE
Some of the Ratherisms:
How hot is it?

 •The presidential race is hotter than a Laredo parking lot. (2000)
•This race is hotter than a Times Square Rolex. (2004)
•This race is hotter than the Devil's anvil. (2004)
•Ohio becomes like a sauna for the two candidates. All they can do is wait and sweat. (2004)
•The presidential race has been crackling like a hickory fire for at least the last hour and a half. (2004)
•In some ways, George Bush's lead is as thin as November ice. (2004)
•Florida, that race, the heat from it is hot enough to peel house paint. (2000)
•It was as hot and squalid as a New York elevator in August.
How tight is it?

 •This race is as tight as rusted lug nuts on a '55 Ford. (2000)
•The election is closer than Lassie and Timmy. (2004)
•His lead is as thin as turnip soup. (2004)
Keep it folksy •In Southern states, they beat (Kerry) like a rented mule. (2004)
•One's reminded of that old saying, 'Don't taunt the alligator until after you've crossed the creek.' (2004)
•He swept through the South like a tornado through a trailer park. (2000)
•If he doesn't carry Florida, Slim will have left town. (2000)
Misc. •It would be Shakespearean for Al Gore to lose because of his home state.
•Kerry's rapidly reaching the point where he's got his back to the wall, his shirttails on fire, and the bill collector's at the door. (2004)
•We've lived by the crystal ball. We're eating so much broken glass, we're in critical condition.
•Texas: 32 electoral votes, another of the so-called big enchiladas, or if not an enchilada, at least a huge taco.

'Well of support' at network

Rather's departure has affected the mood of the network, says Susan Zirinsky, an executive producer at CBS and a Rather colleague for 30 years.

"People feel very sad about Dan's leaving," she says. "It has pushed CBS to look at where the evolution of CBS is. You're always going to find someone to say something that's not nice, but there is such a well of support for Dan at this network."

Zirkinsky, portrayed by Holly Hunter in the movie Broadcast News, has produced a Rather retrospective that will air at 7 p.m. Wednesday.

"It's the journey of a journalist," she says. "He was in those riots, at those churches, on the floor of the conventions, in Bosnia ducking shots. There isn't a single other person that has lived that man's life."

Most people suspect Memogate was key to Rather's decision, announced in late November, to step down as Evening News anchor. But he contends that his retirement was imminent, without regard to the incident.

He considered stepping down as early as 1996. Then in 1999 came a stunning offer from CNN — a 10-year contract, with a salary in excess of $60 million, sources say. CBS countered and persuaded him to stay.

After the 2000 election debacle, he again looked at retirement. "Florida was a screw-up all the way around," he says.

After the election, "things got complicated. Then we went into Sept. 11," and thoughts of retirement evaporated.

"There's no conceit in this," Rather says. "Anchorpeople can be some of the most arrogant, narcissistic, egomaniacal people around. But on 9/11, everything I saw in the street ... " he says, his eyes welling and his voice trailing off.

"I do remember getting strapped into the chair. ... I remember thinking, 'This is horrible, this is terrible. I remember thinking, you've prepared all your life for this,' " he says, his voice breaking. "In a way, I had.

"All those years of ad-libbing has probably been the spine of my being able not only to make it but to last as long as I have."

Grew up in the Heights

He was born Daniel Irvin Rather Jr. in Wharton on Oct. 31, 1931, the son of a pipe layer. A year after Dan Jr.'s birth, the family moved to the Heights, where he attended William G. Love Elementary, Alexander Hamilton Junior High and John H. Reagan High.

He went on to Sam Houston State Teachers College, as Sam Houston State University was then called. He covered sports and news for the Huntsville radio station.

"I tried desperately to get on with the Chronicle," he recalls, "but I was a horrible speller."

So he ended up in radio.

Rather was given an assignment by KTRH to write a 15-minute and a 5-minute newscast. He had it done in half an hour. By late 1954, Rather was the anchor of the 50,000-watt "Voice of the Golden Gulf Coast."

It was at the radio station that he met Jeannie Grace Goebel.

She was an "absolute teetotaling knockout, one where pickup trucks not only stopped but would back up to get a look," Rather says. "She had a great smile. Wide as Texas. She wasn't there very long before I asked her out."

They married in 1957.

Making $87.50 a week

"We lived in a very small, no-bedroom apartment," he remembers. "I came in one night, and she had made my favorite dinner, a Mexican salad. I knew something was up. She had circled a couple of ads for houses in the Chronicle. At this time I was making $87.50 a week, and we could barely afford where we were at."

Two years and two children later, Rather was bringing home $9,000 a year, supplemented by doing play-by-play of University of Houston football and basketball games. He also began calling baseball games for Houston's minor-league team, the Buffs.

He heard about an opening at KGUL, the TV station in Galveston. To get the job, he wrote a script in 10 minutes and then did the entire on-camera audition without looking down at what he'd written.

"Frankly, it was no big deal because I was used to ad-libbing for ball games," Rather says.

Shortly thereafter, KGUL became KHOU, a CBS affiliate, and Rather was its anchorman.

The station quickly became known for its aggressive coverage, one with a reputation for cutting into regular programming with news.

His break came with Hurricane Carla in 1961. The CBS network picked up his coverage. CBS executives were not only watching, they were charmed with Rather's ad-lib reporting style.

By the end of the year, the network had hired him. He was so naive about the business he didn't know that reporters had agents; when he was asked who his was, he said American General, his insurance agent.

His career took off after coverage of President Kennedy's assassination. Rather broke the news of the story to the nation for CBS.

He also found himself in the middle of the tumultuous 1960s with the civil rights struggles and Vietnam. He would go on to become White House correspondent and, in 1981, anchor.

Friends and critics

Even to some of those who call him a friend, Rather can be an enigma.

Mike Wallace and Walter Cronkite were both critical of Rather in a report in the current issue of New Yorker magazine.

Others admire him, and have for years.

"He's always been a man of integrity," said Ron Stone, whom Rather hired away from a station in Oklahoma to work here for KHOU.

"We have spent 20 years working together and against each other," says ABC anchor Peter Jennings. "When I was in London, my two best friends were the chief correspondent from CBS (Rather) and NBC (Tom Brokaw). ... We are very competitive but very good friends."

Newswoman Linda Ellerbee's first exposure to Rather was when she was in high school in Houston, watching him report on Hurricane Carla.

"Like most Texans, when we first met, we got along," says Ellerbee, who recently sent Rather a note thanking him "for never giving up and never giving in" and "for showing us how to spread the credit and take responsibility when things go wrong."

Careless and rushed to air

CBS' internal investigation faulted producers and executives for not fully vetting the memos in question. It also said the story was careless and rushed to air because of a "myopic zeal" to be first in reporting the story.

Rather says that he warned his boss, Heyward, that the Air National Guard story "could be something big but also could have a heavy backside, that this could be radioactive."

Rather says now that he and CBS were "remarkably unprepared to meet the reaction and, in some portions, counterattack."

"We didn't handle it," he says. "We should have been prepared, and we should have reacted to it. And I wish we had worked harder to further authenticate."

His unwavering support of the report sparked further criticism. Does he regret that now?

"It's a hypothetical question because you can't go back."

Was the report rushed to air?

"The decision to go to air was not mine. My job (for 60 Minutes Wednesday) is to report stories."

He bristles at the suggestion that it was the result of his being overworked. In addition to being newscast anchor and 60 Minutes reporter, Rather writes a syndicated column and hosts a daily radio segment. Rather plans to work full-time as a correspondent for 60 Minutes.

"I'm a can-do Houstonian," he says.

"I had to leave Houston to find out how special it is. Houston is the capital of can-do.

"The greatest compliment my father could pay to anybody was to say he's a hoss. Which is to say he has a strong back, you can ride him forever, he's going to get you where you're going. You bet, I always wanted to be a hoss."

Tears again well in Rather's eyes. "It's in that spirit that I reject this notion, this whole theory that somehow I was taken advantage of. That is not true. It's very much in my nature ... that if it's worth getting done, get up, stand on your feet and say, 'Send me.' "


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; rather; seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last


1 posted on 03/06/2005 8:27:37 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

May he go quietly into the night, as is befitting his disgrace.


2 posted on 03/06/2005 8:29:38 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Manoshevitz, did you hear Trump take off after him with Chris Wallace on Fox this morning?


3 posted on 03/06/2005 8:31:24 AM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

"Gracious"?....baloney! Good riddance to this lying, treasonous, pompous, pretentious, flatulent gas bag.


4 posted on 03/06/2005 8:31:37 AM PST by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
His unwavering support of the report sparked further criticism. Does he regret that now?

"It's a hypothetical question because you can't go back."


way to avoid the question you idiot....
5 posted on 03/06/2005 8:31:39 AM PST by MikefromOhio (The DUmmies: Showing us daily how screwed up people can really be!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
That's it. I have to get new glasses!

I thought the headline said...

Rather climbing down from the PINEAPPLE
(that probably would have made a better story)
6 posted on 03/06/2005 8:31:58 AM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

You mean he's cliff diving off the top of the pinnacle?


7 posted on 03/06/2005 8:32:00 AM PST by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"I think it's fair enough to say that the documents weren't conclusively authenticated. ---

Put it on your tombstone (as an understatement), Dan.

You will always be known by 90% of America as a con man.

8 posted on 03/06/2005 8:32:35 AM PST by beyond the sea (Barbara Boxer is Barbra Streisand on peyote .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Sorry your anchor-for-life thing didn't work out, Dan...


9 posted on 03/06/2005 8:33:45 AM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Yeah, Trump ripped him a new one. "You're fired!"
10 posted on 03/06/2005 8:33:55 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Climbing down from the pinnacle?

Bwah! More like shot down in flames, run out of town, tarred and feathered.

11 posted on 03/06/2005 8:34:04 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Too bad he did not meet Vlad the Impaler, it would have given him a new idea of pinnacle.
12 posted on 03/06/2005 8:35:03 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
It's funny in light of how well Fox is doing compared to everyone else lately that you would think everyone would get that we are tired of yellow dog liberalism.

Dan was brought up in that age, so to succeed he had to become (or perhaps always was) far far left.

What I can't get is why they can't understand that we are tired of them. And the sweeps results are proving this point. Hello? Anyone...
13 posted on 03/06/2005 8:36:23 AM PST by nomad5132005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Didn't they mean climbing down from the pedestal?
14 posted on 03/06/2005 8:41:55 AM PST by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"One, this panel found that whatever mistakes were made, they were not born out of political bias. No. 2, after spending four months and $5 million trying to establish that the memos were 'forgeries,' as so many have called them, the panel was unable to do that.

Somebody better break the news to Danno that the above is exactly why "the panel"'s report was laughed off as a lame whitewash the same day it was released.

15 posted on 03/06/2005 8:44:25 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomad5132005
What I can't get is why they can't understand that we are tired of them. That's because (IMHO) they all exist in their own little 'echo chamber' world.

And the sweeps results are proving this point. Hello? Anyone... Nope nobody is 'home' at the networks. Their porch lights are on, but nobody is there.


I predict that in a 'few' years that network news will go back to what it was in the early 1960's - 15 minutes of 'National News' that interrupts your local news and comes on before your weather forecast.

In other words, completely and utterly irrelevant to 94.6523% of America. :-)

16 posted on 03/06/2005 8:45:14 AM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
May he go quietly into the night, as is befitting his disgrace.

HELL NO!

I want him to pull a Howard Beale (Peter Finch-Network) as he signs off.

17 posted on 03/06/2005 8:45:54 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

18 posted on 03/06/2005 8:46:01 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

The staff of the Houston Chronicle is all teary-eyed over his departure. This article was a tribute to a man they adore.


19 posted on 03/06/2005 8:47:14 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Dan Rather has set the standard for Yellow TV journalism.

Good riddance Dan, you won't be missed.


20 posted on 03/06/2005 8:47:23 AM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Is he still married to the same wife?


21 posted on 03/06/2005 8:48:51 AM PST by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
gracious and in good spirits

Hardly describes Dan Rather as a man dealing with what he considers political opponenets.

He's a mean-spirited, power abusing hack.

22 posted on 03/06/2005 8:49:13 AM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
The headline should read, "Rather, Crawling Back in His Hole."
23 posted on 03/06/2005 8:49:40 AM PST by Goldwater4ever (Aut Pax Aut Bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
Photo
Chronicle file
CBS news anchor Dan Rather and his wife, Jean, arrive at CBS' 75th anniversary celebration Nov. 2, 2003, in New York
24 posted on 03/06/2005 8:50:16 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Climbing down from his "pile" would be nearer the truth.


25 posted on 03/06/2005 8:51:43 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
...and yet in a rich form of irony, tonight Leslie Stahl is doing a hit piece on 60 Mins on Tom DeLay. On Nov 22 2004,(41 years to the date that Rather became famous) CBS NewsWeb site reported that Tom DeLay was off the hook http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/03/politics/main664541.shtml and NOW in an uncanny deja'vu a 60 Minutes program is going to make a story out of a story that was already discredited, only this time it was CBS News itself that stated DeLay was off the hook.
26 posted on 03/06/2005 8:54:38 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Dan Rather is Geraldo Rivera without the journalistic integrity.


27 posted on 03/06/2005 8:56:12 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

MORE WHERE THOSE CAME FROM


28 posted on 03/06/2005 8:56:25 AM PST by FreeKeys ("...as phony as a Dan Rather memo." -- James Taranto, OpinionJournal.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
My job (for 60 Minutes Wednesday) is to report stories."

Ahh, the good ol' Sgt. Schultz defense:

"I know nothing."

29 posted on 03/06/2005 8:58:49 AM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
weren't conclusively authenticated.
================================================

One word is sufficient, Dan. FAKE.

30 posted on 03/06/2005 9:00:03 AM PST by doug from upland (Ray Charles --- a great musician and safer driver than Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I'm doubting that very many citizens of Houston even want to claim Dan these days.


31 posted on 03/06/2005 9:01:19 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Please leave a message after the burp....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Ha! Good one.

Somewhere in the great beyond, Nixon is enjoying a good laugh.


32 posted on 03/06/2005 9:05:27 AM PST by Zman516
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone


33 posted on 03/06/2005 9:06:05 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Rather climbing down from the pinnacle.

Like a southern baptist preacher caught in a cat house.

34 posted on 03/06/2005 9:09:07 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Great collection!


35 posted on 03/06/2005 9:09:52 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
HEY!!!

Where in his bio is the part of his service as a "former Marine"....??????? He used to make that a hallmark of his defense against being "hard on the military" or "liberal".

lying liberal sack of solid nitrogenous waste.... good f'ing riddance... don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya... Dan...

uh........ buh-bye.....you hump. Go spend some of that CBS money getting a makeover for that monkey you call a daughter.

Image hosted by TinyPic.com

36 posted on 03/06/2005 9:10:46 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
An internal investigation came down hard on CBS but spared Rather and CBS News President Andrew Heyward.

In other words it was a whitewash. The report was designed for damage control. It speaks in a vague, passive tone ("Mistakes were made." "Sources were not adequately authenticated.") The wonderful institution of CBS that set the gold standard of journalistic integrity for the last 40 years suddenly doesn't know what makes water boil.

37 posted on 03/06/2005 9:11:26 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Please leave a message after the burp....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Perhaps he's earned more than his share these last six months, since his Sept. 8 report about George W. Bush's tenure in the Texas Air National Guard aired on 60 Minutes Wednesday. The report immediately came under scrutiny, with bloggers and critics arguing that the memos on which it was partly based were fraudulent.

What a nuanced statement.

We didn't argue that they were fraudulent.

We PROVED they were fraudulent.

38 posted on 03/06/2005 9:13:11 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Rather climbing down from the pinnacle

Good riddance and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

39 posted on 03/06/2005 9:13:51 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Our rebuttal to Dan's statements:

http://ratherbiased.com/news/content/view/760/2/


40 posted on 03/06/2005 9:13:52 AM PST by RatherBiased.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

May he be given a "ROTTEN ROPE"!


41 posted on 03/06/2005 9:15:04 AM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Rather says. "One, this panel found that whatever mistakes were made, they were not born out of political bias. And 2, after spending four months and $5 million trying to establish that the memos were 'forgeries,' as so many have called them, the panel was unable to do that.

Gosh, you mean that a CBS panel was unable to find out something that would disgrace them?

Imagine that.

Sounds like Dan is sticking by the memos after all.

42 posted on 03/06/2005 9:16:44 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

He grew up in the Heights? I wonder if he knew Elmer, "Mom I killed him", Wayne Henley.


43 posted on 03/06/2005 9:18:35 AM PST by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

ah yes! more on the mating habits of swine.


44 posted on 03/06/2005 9:18:35 AM PST by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Dan Rather, gracious and in good spirits, .....

ie. highly medicated.

So9

45 posted on 03/06/2005 9:19:43 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; All
Sorry, Dan, Sorry, SeeBS, WE WHO DO OUR HOMEWORK can tell even the "story" the phony documents are supposed to be about is phony 
____________________________

Find an overview of the FACTS about GWB's Texas Air National Guard Service at http://www.hillnews.com/york/090904.aspx

A summary of the salient points are at  http://boortz.com/nuze/200409/09152004.html#guard

STAUDT FINALLY SURFACES: DUBYA DID NOT GET SPECIAL TREATMENT AND "SUGAR COATING" WAS NEVER REQUESTED BY ANYBODY.  See http://snipurl.com/c1iu  and   http://snipurl.com/9bny

Ed Morrisey, the guy who swore W into the TANG weighs in here:  http://www.thedailytimes.com/sited/story/html/173996   (the paper's front page is at  http://www.thedailytimes.com/  )

Find this:  "The Air Force, in their ultimate wisdom, assembled a group of 102's [F-102 pilots] and took them to Southeast Asia. Bush volunteered to go.  But he needed to have 500 [flight] hours, but he only had just over 300 hours so he wasn't eligible to go,” Morrisey recalls. ... Despite that, Lieutenant Bush stayed busy. ... "He flew in active air defense missions, training missions.    Day, night, regardless of inclement weather," Morrisey says. ... Colonel Morrisey assured us that to the best of his knowledge Lieutenant Bush was treated like any other officer in the Texas Air National Guard. ... Morrisey says he considers himself to be more of a Libertarian than Republican or Democrat.  Nonetheless, Morrisey says he is voting for George Bush come election day. -- in BOTH printable version AND video clip at   http://www.volunteertv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2346701

See what Dubya's Wing Men (NOT boaters or yachtsmen, now, but FELLOW FIGHTER PILOTS) had to say (they were not in the SAME supersonic fighter plane with him, but they DID SERVE WITH HIM AND FLEW ALONGSIDE HIM) here: http://snipurl.com/6qkp

A Commentary by Col. John H. Wambough, Jr. USAF (Ret.) is at:  http://jb-williams.com/guest-kerry.htm

Major General Hodges says GWB didn't get preferential treatment, didn't need any, and besides, he's mad at CBS for misleading him here:  http://snipurl.com/a3y2

4 Eyewitnesses who saw GWB serving in Alabama are quoted and sourced HERE: http://snipurl.com/a3y3

See Exactly WHERE George W. Bush's TANG service fits in The REALLY Big Picture here:  http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3919

And don't forget, IT WAS GWB who signed the Standard Form 180 asking that ALL his military records be released and JFK who DID NOT.  Physical exams were irrelevant to someone like GWB who'd already taken physicals and flown for 3 years and no more flying was required (on top of that, the F-102 had started to be phased out anyway); they were never considered worth writing him up for except in the FAKE memos, the source of which SeeBS refuses to identify. 

"In Texas in the late sixties and early seventies, it was so Democratic that no Republican had enough pull to have a parking ticket fixed [let alone get someone into the National Guard]." -- Robert, Lubbock, TX -- email to Fox NewsWatch, 9-18-04

Besides, Daddy Bush (GHWB) was only a junior Republican U.S. Congressman at the time and had absolutely NO influence in the LBJ/Barnes-dominated state government in Austin.   THE reason they took W was because the Texas Air National Guard didn't have enough applicants to be pilots at the time, while almost all the other services did.

Bush served HONORABLY, with multiple links HERE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1230803/posts

"The [Texas Air National Guard] records released Tuesday also include orders for an August 1971 training mission in Canada, where Bush impressed his commanders. An evaluation written nine months later said Bush's 'skills as an interceptor pilot enabled him to complete all his ADC (Air Defense Command) intercept missions during the Canadian deployment with ease'." -- The Wichita Eagle, 10-5-04

Kerry's questions are answered here:  http://snipurl.com/a71g

This whole SeeBS fiasco was based on such an irrelevant non-story from the git-go that one can only presume there was a complete breakdown, or even lack, of standards and possibly, even malice aforethought, especially if you review the timeline of the SeeBS fiasco here:
http://snipurl.com/a3y6

Golly, it would have been nice to say, well, they both were irresponsible kids who got away with really, really bad stuff, but hell, it's all water over the dam, etc.  EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT IT TURNS OUT IF W GOT INTO ANY MISCHIEF, IT HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH WHAT THEY'VE TRIED TO FRAME HIM FOR.  The NYTimes' and Flim Flam Dan Rather's claims that yes, the memos are fake, but what they say is true -- amounts to saying it's OK to fabricate and plant evidence if you think -- or at least hope --  someone's guilty.

"This is the same media that spent months investigating George W. Bush's military record and, even after key allegations were revealed to be based on forgeries, continued publicizing rumors and innuendoes. They didn't stop even after the President signed Form 180, opening all his military records to the public." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell, here: http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=4142
 

As far as the documents go, their fraudulence is PROVEN here: http://snipurl.com/c1k0
See what a REAL Texas Air National Guard document from the '70s looks like HERE: http://www.geocities.com/bush_not_awol/document40.html

The latest attempt to prove the phony memos are "real" (this time by Utah Professor David Hailey), is shown to be yet ANOTHER fraud here:  http://wizbangblog.com/archives/003851.php

The Texas forgery code provides that publication of two or more fake government documents is a felony.  Follow the updates on CBS's tampering with the evidence in this crime HERE:  http://snipurl.com/9eqw   Further, there may have been a criminal conspiracy to use forged documents in an attempt to influence a Presidential election, a federal crime.

-- all from  http://freedomkeys.com/w-tangfacts.htm

find an easier-to-copy-and-email version of this page HERE.


46 posted on 03/06/2005 9:26:02 AM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
[ "Memogate," as the resulting crisis has been coined, has plagued CBS News ever since, a lightning rod for the conservatives who say the media exudes a liberal bias. ]

No... Memogate.. was yet another democrat folly...
from the war-room in their war against America...
But that one died a slow death in a republican Rino hell...

Dan Rathers folly was an alleged memo not an actual one..
The cBS folks just made it up... They just thunk it up for propaganda value..
not counting the actual Sedition and seditious value in a Presidential election cycle.
Its kind of like the King county(WA.) stealing of the Governorship that DID work.
Repubicans don't seem to care who wins, its the game that counts to them..

Except for a bunch of irate bloggers this sedition of Rathers would not be even noticed.. One wonders what other mischief the democrats have been up to low the last say, 50 YEARS.... The mind boggles.. The democrats KNOW republicans will not fight BACK... WHich, no doubt, just encourages them more..

47 posted on 03/06/2005 9:26:19 AM PST by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

48 posted on 03/06/2005 9:29:17 AM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

"Listen, I've made every mistake in the book at least twice," Rather says, I work too hard, care too much, speak truth to power too much. But the one thing I can't figure out is why nobody tunes in to watch me anymore.


49 posted on 03/06/2005 9:30:10 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
after spending four months and $5 million trying to establish that the memos were 'forgeries,' as so many have called them, the panel was unable to do that.<<<<

Speaks volumes about the "panel"...it was established the memos were typed with a computer that didn't exist at the time...How much more proof does one need?????????...GEEZ!
50 posted on 03/06/2005 9:31:22 AM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson