Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: No passports at borders
Fox.com ^ | 4/15 | Fox News

Posted on 04/15/2005 6:49:37 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility

WASHINGTON — Plans requiring passports from people entering the United States don't pass muster with President Bush

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: border; bordersecurity; bush; bushamnesty; illegal; illegalaliens; immigration; minuteman; passports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last
I am stunned by this comment. Whats it going to take to get some border security here? This is insane! Now we should not ask for passports because it might inconvienience people and take some time? This is nuts!
1 posted on 04/15/2005 6:49:38 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Bush: "Passaports! They don't need no stinkin' passaports!"


2 posted on 04/15/2005 6:52:31 AM PDT by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
It really hurts business and I don't want my biometric data taken just because I want to spend a day or two in Mexico or Canada. It's pointless while we still have such porous borders.
3 posted on 04/15/2005 6:54:34 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Bush not concerned with border security ping.


4 posted on 04/15/2005 6:55:20 AM PDT by Marine Inspector (Customs & Border Protection Officer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
It really hurts business and I don't want my biometric data taken just because I want to spend a day or two in Mexico or Canada. It's pointless while we still have such porous borders.

Exactly. We need to use market forces to address this 'so called' border problem. It's funny how most on this thread seem to think ANOTHER piece of paper required by government is going to make them feel better.

5 posted on 04/15/2005 6:56:42 AM PDT by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
"I thought there was a better way to expedite the legal flow of traffic and people," he said.

How do you determine who is legal vs. illegal without checking their ID's? This is Bush's way of ratifying the Free Trade of the America's without having to have that pesky legislative branch (the will of the people) involved.

6 posted on 04/15/2005 6:57:18 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

"Whats it going to take to get some border security here? "


It's gonna take a MASSIVE terrorist attack that results in the loss of thousands of American lives and billions of dollars of damage.

Oh wait - we've already had that....

Just another reason why it's impossible to take Bush seriously on the WOT when he steadfastly refuses to protect even his own borders.


7 posted on 04/15/2005 6:57:27 AM PDT by Blzbba ("Under every stone lurks a politician. " Aristophanes, 410 BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Would you believe..................Guestports?


8 posted on 04/15/2005 6:57:39 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
I am stunned by this comment.

I'm not. But then again I read the entire article so I could take this comment in context. It's not a big deal to me.

9 posted on 04/15/2005 6:57:40 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

Who's he think he is, anyways.


10 posted on 04/15/2005 6:57:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Time Ebbs No Rankle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone

You mean like punishing businesses who hire illegals?


11 posted on 04/15/2005 6:58:03 AM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

And so it begins...... Bush relaxing his security stance....boosting Tancredo for 08....Tancredo loses....Jeb in 2012. Sorry to sound like a conspircy theorist, but slowly but surely my assessment is coming to light.


12 posted on 04/15/2005 6:58:43 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

The thing at issue is absolutely no one told the White House about the change to requiring passports; Bush was completely blindsided and said he found out about it on the radio.

Heads are gonna roll.


13 posted on 04/15/2005 6:58:51 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
How do you determine who is legal vs. illegal without checking their ID's? This is Bush's way of ratifying the Free Trade of the America's without having to have that pesky legislative branch (the will of the people) involved.

Friendly suggestion: Read the article before commenting.

14 posted on 04/15/2005 6:59:28 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko
Bush relaxing his security stance....boosting Tancredo for 08....Tancredo loses....

You mean Tancredo gets the nomination and loses? BWHAAHAHAHAHAHA.

15 posted on 04/15/2005 6:59:29 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
Just another reason why it's impossible to take Bush seriously on the WOT when he steadfastly refuses to protect even his own borders.

Did anyone read this article? Or is everyone too busy jumping to conclusions?

16 posted on 04/15/2005 7:00:08 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Tancredo will not win. Whatever party that nominates a moderate will win.


17 posted on 04/15/2005 7:00:36 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

I agree. We need passports. People have told me that when they go to Canada, it's harder for them to get into Canada then it is to come back to the US. Now that's saying something.

President Bush, the Canadian and Mexican borders are INTERNATIONAL. I needed a passport to go to France. I also have to have one when I go to China. Just because Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean nations are our neighbors, that does not mean that we are to give them special status.


18 posted on 04/15/2005 7:00:40 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility; HiJinx
"The president said Thursday he was surprised by the proposed rules announced last week by the State and Homeland Security departments."

That's what we've been telling the President all along - WE WANT TIGHTER BORDER CONTROL!

Walk around with yer head in a fog ignoring everyone else but Fox and when it lifts a bit yer surprised.

Well, surprise! surprise!

I would expect the resignations of those department heads who made the recommendations on the President's desk, stat. How dare them not agree with his open border policy.

19 posted on 04/15/2005 7:02:59 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

The family and I are driving to Michigan this week, we have to go through Canada to get to Michigan. Requiring a passport would be A HUGE F-NG PAIN IN THE ASS!!!!!

Illegals aren't passing through gated entry points...they are coming across unguarded territory. So guard it better and don't burden the average citizen.


20 posted on 04/15/2005 7:03:03 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson