Posted on 05/19/2005 6:44:26 AM PDT by AMTRepub
In violation of its promises to faculty of academic freedom and due process, DePaul University has suspended Professor Thomas Klocek without a hearing for engaging in a controversial out-of-class debate with students. After Professor Klocek and several pro-Palestinian students engaged in a heated argument over Middle East issues at a student activities fair, students complained to administrators who immediately suspended the professor, denying him the rights normally afforded to professors accused of wrongdoing. Statements from university administrators indicate that the professor was disciplined because of his harsh criticism of the students’ viewpoint. For full details, please read below.
Sincerely,
David French President Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) 210 West Washington Square Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:david.french@thefire.org tel (215) 717-3473 fax (215) 717-3440
----------
DePaul Professor Suspended Without a Hearing After Arguing with Students on Middle East Issues
CHICAGO, May 18, 2005—DePaul University administrators have suspended Professor Thomas Klocek without a hearing after he engaged in an out-of-class argument with pro-Palestinian students at a student activities fair. When the students complained to administrators, Klocek was denied the rights that DePaul guarantees to professors accused of wrongdoing and immediately suspended. Statements from DePaul administrators indicate that Klocek was disciplined because of his harsh criticism of the students’ viewpoint, despite DePaul’s stated commitments to free speech and academic freedom.
“DePaul has unquestionably violated Professor Klocek’s due process rights, and the university did so because his statements were allegedly offensive,” commented David French, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which wrote to DePaul on Klocek’s behalf.
The incident in question occurred on September 15, 2004, when Professor Klocek engaged in conversation with students representing Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and United Muslims Moving Ahead (UMMA). According to the DePaulia student newspaper and other sources, during the debate, Klocek cited a Chicago Sun-Times article that quoted the general manager of the Al-Arabiya television network as saying, “It is a certain fact that not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims.” A heated but strictly verbal argument ensued during which Klocek argued that a Christian viewpoint, in addition to Muslim or Jewish ones, should be considered in discussing Israel and Palestine. According to Klocek, SJP and UMMA students (several of whom had gathered around Professor Klocek) made their own controversial statements comparing Israeli Jews to Nazis. The argument concluded when Klocek walked away from the SJP and UMMA tables and thumbed his chin at the students in what he believed to be an Italian hand gesture meaning “I’m outta here.”
The offended students complained to DePaul administrators, who moved quickly to punish Professor Klocek for his part in the argument. Klocek reports that on September 24, 2004, Dean of the School of New Learning Susanne Dumbleton informed him that the university had received letters of complaint from SJP and UMMA students and had met with the students and their faculty advisors the previous evening. Dumbleton immediately suspended Klocek with pay and ordered him to stay off campus. Klocek was never given a copy of the complaint letters, nor was he given a hearing or any other chance to face his accusers before his suspension.
In an October 8 letter to the DePaulia about the university’s actions, Dumbleton explained, “The students’ perspective was dishonored and their freedom demeaned. Individuals were deeply insulted…. Our college acted immediately by removing the instructor from the classroom.” Dumbleton also made several other comments indicating that DePaul was primarily concerned with the content of Klocek’s remarks. On November 10, Klocek finally received a letter confirming his punishment and stating that he would be able to teach only one class the following semester, and that the class would be subject to observation.
Klocek’s suspension violated DePaul’s own policies guaranteeing academic freedom as well as its contractual promises of basic due process. Klocek was suspended without a hearing, which DePaul policies say can only be done in an “emergency.” Though DePaul now claims that the argument created the “emergency” conditions necessary for an immediate suspension, the university waited a full nine days before acting against Klocek—hardly the response of a school in the grip of an “emergency” situation.
“If DePaul professors aren’t worried about this situation, they should be,” remarked Greg Lukianoff, FIRE’s director of legal and public advocacy. “Due process is most important in cases like Klocek’s in which facts need to be sorted through and in which punishment can be severe and career-ending. By refusing Professor Klocek a hearing at such a crucial juncture, DePaul threw its stated commitments to basic procedural rights out the window and missed an opportunity to discover what actually took place.”
On March 24, 2005, FIRE wrote DePaul’s president, Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, on Professor Klocek’s behalf. FIRE asked the university to honor its own commitments and reminded DePaul that “[i]f every person had the power to punish those who expressed ideas they found offensive, we would all soon be reduced to silence.” President Holtschneider responded, saying this was not a matter of academic freedom and that “the university acted to address threatening and unprofessional behavior.” He also noted that Klocek had refused to pursue the university’s grievance process. This response contradicts Dean Dumbleton’s original justification for the school’s punishment. Furthermore, the grievance process available to Professor Klocek does not have the authority to restore his position.
FIRE’s French remarked, “While DePaul may now argue that the issue is one of professionalism, its public statements at the time of Klocek’s punishment make it clear that Klocek’s real crime was offending students during an out-of-class discussion of a controversial and emotional topic. Academic freedom cannot survive when professors who engage in debate on controversial topics are subject to administrative punishment without even the most cursory due process.”
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation’s colleges and universities. FIRE’s efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
David French, President, FIRE: 215-717-3473; david.french@thefire.org
Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, FIRE: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
Tom Ciesielka, President, TC Public Relations: 312-422-1333; tc@tcpr.net
Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, President, DePaul University: 312-362-8000; dholtsch@depaul.edu
Conservative Professor??
SNUFF HIM OUT!!
Meanwhile, Ward Churchill continues his madness unabated.
More tolerance brought to you by the Islamist loving left.
Should change the name from DePaul to Abdul.
This guys should immediately forge some Indian paintings and call Americans "little Eichmans" if he wants his job back.
Snot Nosed Commies: Mr. President, Professor Klocek doesn't agree with us on Middle East policy. He's being very intolerant of our views.
Depaul President: Well in that case we need to suspend him immediately.
Ya can't make this stuff up.
I thought it was a Professor's job to critique students' perspective.
and their freedom demeaned.
What? First, what does this mean? Second, so what?
Individuals were deeply insulted
Aww, poor babies. Why is this a suspendable offense?
What was the emergency? Was there a threat of violence? What was the danger here?
Higher Learning in America
The prof was in trouble over his opinion. He did not tow the official universty at 'Palestinians are oppressed by the evil jooz' PC groupthink. He must be assimilated and his resistance is futile.
Dumbleton = dumb + town, again in a diminutive form, so it translates to a "stupid little town"
So, Susanne Dumbleton = "stupid little pig from a stupid little town," and that sounds wonderfully descriptive of a mean, trough-feeding bureaucrat who peddles slops called "new learning." Those who cannot master the old learning are doomed to remain piggies.
How DARE HE not do anything but worship the Palestinian's and their plight!!!
Please don't kill Jews = hate speech
Ah, so Arafat was just using the Pali derivative, "Suuuuuuuuuuuhaaaaaaaaaaa", to call his wife.
The incident in question occurred on September 15, 2004, when Professor Churchill engaged in conversation with students representing Christian Students for Justice in America [CSJA] and United Christians Moving Ahead (UCMA). According to the DePaulia student newspaper and other sources, during the debate, Churchill cited a Chicago Sun-Times article that quoted Dan Rather of the CBS television network as saying, “It is a certain fact that not all Christians are right wing extremists but it is equally certain, and totally understandable, that almost all right wing extremists are Christians.” A heated but strictly verbal argument ensued during which Churchill argued that only a Muslim viewpoint, instead of a Christian one, should be considered in discussing The Constitution. According to Churchill , CSJA and UCMA students (several of whom had gathered around Professor Churchill ) made their own controversial statements suggesting The Founders were Christian. The argument concluded when Churchill walked away from the CSJA and UCMA tables and thumbed his chin at the students in what he believed to be a Cuban hand gesture meaning “I’m outta here.”
- - - - - - - - -
Different result maybe?
"Susanne Dumbleton"
'Nuff said....
Perhaps what they save in this professor's salary will help keep the PLO scum on a free ride. (Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought DePaul was a CATHOLIC institution.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.