Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Predators & Pornography. A disturbing link.
NRO ^ | May 19, 2005, 8:15 a.m. | By Penny Nance

Posted on 05/19/2005 11:05:47 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 641-645 next last
To: Conservatrix

Trite.


61 posted on 05/19/2005 11:53:03 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I think both sides of this are right and wrong. I'm sure that there is a small hardcore group of people that porn leads to commit violent sexual crime. The trouble is, 90% of the people who watch porn will never commit such a crime. I practiced criminal law for 15 years and there is no question in my mind that alcohol was linked in some fashion with the vast majority of violent crimes committed. If alcohol could actually be banished today the crime rate would plummet. BUT....90% of the people who drink alcohol will never committ a violent crime. SO...is it right to try to ban alcohol or porn for the honest majority who sample it just to deal with the 10% who it effects in an incredibly socially destrctive manner? I don't know the answer but the results of prohibition and our current drug laws indicate that banning isn't the answer. (note: I do not drink alcohol, do drugs or view porn other than the occaisional racy e-mail I get)


62 posted on 05/19/2005 11:53:37 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I am not a libertarian and I am proud not to be part of the "everything should be legal, moral relativism" crowd.


63 posted on 05/19/2005 11:53:42 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

"Every single one of those predators also drank water and ate bread at some point in their lives. This does not mean that bread and water drove them to predation"

I agree. To blame porno for the problem would be no different than blaming guns for violence - which I assume most of us here would not.


64 posted on 05/19/2005 11:54:24 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
80 percent of rapists and serial killers are heavy pornography users.

Coincidence.

Correlation isn't causation.

We have a God-given right to view obscene images.

It's a victimless crime.

Did I miss any other sophistries?

65 posted on 05/19/2005 11:54:36 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Oh boy another porn thread. The evangelicals will be coming out of the woodwork on this one.


66 posted on 05/19/2005 11:54:46 AM PDT by holdmuhbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

That's an opinion. Many on the left see a device such as a gun, dezigned for he specific task of killing to be immoral. Some really left wackos think cars are immoral too. I find the female figure to be beautiful in its raw form, not immoral.


67 posted on 05/19/2005 11:55:44 AM PDT by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Alcohol is not immoral in and of itself, the abuse of alcohol is. Porn is by its very nature immoral. There is no morally correct way to enjoy pornography.


68 posted on 05/19/2005 11:56:00 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"I guess if one person isn't allergic to bee stings, no one else could possibly be allergic either."

Well that doesn't mean if a single person were allergic to bee stings we should eradicat all bees, does it?


69 posted on 05/19/2005 11:57:10 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Probably about the same as football Sunday or a golfing vacation. Are you saying that if women don't like it, that men must give it up and ban it?

If your watching of football and taking a golf vacation causes your wife extreme emotional distress, you might want to think about it...
70 posted on 05/19/2005 11:57:24 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Did you by chance see last night's Inside Edition?
71 posted on 05/19/2005 11:57:40 AM PDT by Houmatt (Jeb Bush is a moron. Tracking devices on sex offenders? Give me a break!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bird4four4
I find the female figure to be beautiful in its raw form, not immoral.I absolutely agree with you. No one is arguing that a woman's body isn't beautiful. If someone is, they are wrong. We are arguing pornography.
72 posted on 05/19/2005 11:57:54 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I'm surprised ServesURight hasn't appeared on this thread yet LOL

The two of you battled on porn threads.

73 posted on 05/19/2005 11:57:58 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Harmful Or Fatal If Swallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
So if life imitates art, and a piece of supposed art models a destructive form of behavior that we would never want to see indulged, should that piece of art be banned?

First of all, let's not pretend that pornography in any way, shape or form resembles 'art'.
As far as banning it, I wouldn't have a problem with that at all, but I'd think there were Constitutional issues to contend with in doing so. But I wonder if things like pornography, dope, and other immoral and/or illicit effects don't serve the unintended purpose of building character in those who ignore these things.

Evil has been with us since Lucifer and 1/3 of the angels vacated the Lord's immediate side. Ban pornography and we'd still have murders, thefts, etc.

If anything to be banned it should be liberals and liberalism. They are after all the ones perpetuating the aforementioned vices by instilling lax laws and punishments and even acceptance of them to an extent.

74 posted on 05/19/2005 11:58:39 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdmuhbeer
Oh boy another porn thread. The evangelicals will be coming out of the woodwork on this one.

As will the porn addicts...

75 posted on 05/19/2005 11:58:49 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Direct harm to another person or their property in no part of that philosophy. Rape is rape no matter whether the predator was raped as a child or was just drunk at the time. Trying to blame porn for predation is like blaming mountains for skiing accidents.

There is nothing "relativistic" about it. Sexual predation is a CRIME no matter who the hell you are. Of course, if you could get past the whole "sex is icky and immoral" thing, the nwe could probably have a decent conversation about why some people become sexual predators and effective means of doing something about it. Like enforcing a death penalty for repeat offenders and more victim armament laws.

But Noooo.... just got go after the porn industry. For the same reasons Sarah Brady is going after Colt and Smith and Wesson.

76 posted on 05/19/2005 11:58:53 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Did I miss any other sophistries?

How about, "I use porn and I'm normal--I swear!"
77 posted on 05/19/2005 11:58:56 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
should that piece of art be banned?

First, is the "piece of art" intrinsically evil. Yes, pornography is intrinsically evil. That people argue over what constitutes pornography only demonstrates that all people recognize the principle.

Second, is it prudent to ban pornography? In other words, does banning pornography do more harm to society than pornography itself? I say no. I remember the days when pornography wasn't widely available, and I don't remember any crimes associated with its criminalization, as there are with drug criminalization.

78 posted on 05/19/2005 12:00:09 PM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I won't stay long. Eventually the porn pirates will gather in a bunch and start holding church camp. I usually bolt when that happens.


79 posted on 05/19/2005 12:01:20 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Dude you'll never get anywhere with these people, its just not worth arguing on these threads.


80 posted on 05/19/2005 12:01:36 PM PDT by holdmuhbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 641-645 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson