Oh, hey, thanks for the enlightenment, your eminence.
Lust is not at issue, which should be obvious, had you taken the time to read my post, rather than dismiss it as sophistry.
It must be possible to have marital sex without lust, otherwise any sex would be "inordinate craving" by your definition. So, is videotaped, lust-free sex, still porn?
Looking forward to your patronizing response.
Then what's your point?
It must be possible to have marital sex without lust, otherwise any sex would be "inordinate craving" by your definition.
Look up "inordinate."
So, is videotaped, lust-free sex, still porn?
Looking forward to your patronizing response.
You asked for it. This is sophistical and not worthy of a response. I don't see any interest in your part in finding the truth. I gave you the principles. Apply them. Or don't. Your choice.