Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancer Society fined for lack of disclosure in anti-smoking ads
The News Tribune.com ^ | 6-10-05 | KENNETH P. VOGEL

Posted on 06/14/2005 8:04:29 AM PDT by SheLion

When the American Cancer Society last year paid to air television ads warning of the dangers of secondhand smoke, it didn’t disclose the expenditure because, it contended, the ads weren’t supporting a proposed smoking ban working its way through the Legislature.

The state’s Public Disclosure Commission disagreed and the society eventually reported the money it spent on the ads.

But that wasn’t enough for the commission, which Thursday approved a $3,500 fine against the society for missing deadlines to report the money it spent on the ads and other so-called “grass-roots lobbying” intended to generate support for smoking ban proposals.

According to a report from the commission’s staff, “the violations are significant,” since the $64,200 the commission spent pushing the smoking ban wasn’t disclosed until after the 2004 legislative session ended. That means people watching the ads – some of which featured former U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop urging them to ask their legislators to support the ban – didn’t know who was paying for them.

The smoking ban proposals, which would have prohibited smoking in bars, restaurants and most other non-tribal businesses, failed. An initiative that would have done the same thing failed to make the ballot last year, though a similar one this year appears more likely to make the Nov. 8 ballot, thanks in part to nearly $600,000 in backing from the Cancer Society.

But the society has also missed deadlines for reporting its contributions to the initiative this year, according to the commission’s report. As part of the agreement approved Thursday, if the society commits another violation or fails to meet other conditions, it will trigger an additional $4,000 in fines.

The commission Thursday also fined the American Heart Association $400 for missing deadlines to report nearly $15,000 it spent pushing the smoking bans.

And it fined Breathe Easy Washington, the group that pushed last year’s failed smoking ban initiative, $400 for missing deadlines to report $8,500 in contributions it received last year.

Kenneth P. Vogel: 360-754-6093

ken.vogel@thenewstribune.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: antismokers; augusta; baldacci; bans; butts; camel; caribou; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; fda; forces; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: SheLion
I have not donated to them since they started diverting massive funds for political activism as opposed to cancer research.

Fraud is the word that comes to mind...lobbying paid for out of donations for research, and presented as "public education".

21 posted on 06/14/2005 8:43:48 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
The solution, then, is to do away with tax-exempt status altogether, not to use it as a way of controlling the political debate.
22 posted on 06/14/2005 8:44:58 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: metesky
They have no vested interest in curing cancer, anymore than the DEA has a vested interest in stopping the flow of illegal drugs.

If cancer goes away, so do their do nothing, propagandizing, no-heavy-lifting jobs.

That's exactly it!!!!!  No more cancer, then they lose their cushy jobs and overstuffed wallets!  Makes me want to throw up with what they are doing with that money!



23 posted on 06/14/2005 8:45:11 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: AntiGuv

don't donate to the united way for one


25 posted on 06/14/2005 8:47:35 AM PDT by markman46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: inquest

That is a good start.....however, I do not believe these organizations should be doing any lobbying at all if they receive any money whatsoever from the taxpayers in any shape or form.


26 posted on 06/14/2005 8:47:39 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
SheLion, would you re-add me to your ping list? :) thanks!
27 posted on 06/14/2005 9:10:51 AM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

You are correct. I was the director of candlelighters. Parents of children who have/had cancer in Humboldt County. It was like pulling teeth for the cancer society to assist us in anything. Go down to your local cancer society ane all you see is non smoking ads. They are obsessed with it. I knew this all along. all they spend their money on is administration and non smoking ads.


28 posted on 06/14/2005 9:36:43 AM PDT by mzbzybee ((formerly, Beeline40 member since 3-20-1999))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: metesky

The cancer organization were 98% of all monies go to research patient assistance is the leukemia society.


29 posted on 06/14/2005 9:37:55 AM PDT by mzbzybee ((formerly, Beeline40 member since 3-20-1999))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mzbzybee; SheLion

Thanks for your most informative post and thanks for the wonderful work you are doing.

I have not had any direct dealings with the ACS but your post enlightened me quite a bit.

Not one dime from me,not one dime!


30 posted on 06/14/2005 9:40:42 AM PDT by Mears (Keep the government out of my face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"It's too bad no one's focusing on the real scandal in this story: the fact that a private organization has to clear it with the government before launching any kind of message campaign, if it might somehow influence the outcome of legislation."

Well said.

31 posted on 06/14/2005 9:45:51 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"We know people lose their lives to secondhand smoke and we see it as our obligation to protect those people from getting sick or dying," said Karen Becker, spokeswoman for the American Cancer Society of New York and New Jersey, which supports New Jersey's proposed indoor smoking ban.

And they wonder why we're pissed off at them.

32 posted on 06/14/2005 10:19:23 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
SheLion, would you re-add me to your ping list? :) thanks!

You bet!!!! Gotcha added! :)

33 posted on 06/14/2005 11:01:13 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
And they wonder why we're pissed off at them.

They are a bunch of bottom feeder low-lives! I can't stand any of them. And the United Way is another one!

34 posted on 06/14/2005 11:03:27 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
In stead of using their donations for finding cures and for education, all they can concentrate now is on smoking bans!

Lets not ignore the salaries being paid to the pseudos heading up this questionable organization........

35 posted on 06/14/2005 5:57:59 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Back in the late 70's my mother eventually died from bone cancer. While she was in her last year of life, my stepfather asked for assistance from the ACS due to the fact they could not afford the $300 per week chemo therapy she needed. They got no response but hey, thats the way it goes......

Just like all these other alleged do-good foundations, the folks at the top are rolling in dough while the folks the fund was intended to help are still dying and exhausting their life savings.........

In my opinion, the American Cancer Society is the most over rated non-profit org in existence today..........

36 posted on 06/14/2005 6:21:13 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

You're not alone-I read that post by inquest several times, and still haven't quite decided what the point was. Wish some folks would simplify.


37 posted on 06/14/2005 11:42:47 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Ok, 2nd comment was much better, but I doubt if it would stop the usual suspects, as they've got those millions they stole from the tobacco companies in the infamous settlement. Not quite sure if said monies would be effected, but they'll be able to find a way around it. And churches have been doing it for years.


38 posted on 06/14/2005 11:51:56 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
What P.M. Off is that any tax free donation that goes to any charity forces me and you to pay more taxes to make up for that the donater didn't have to p[ay.
39 posted on 06/15/2005 12:06:32 AM PDT by dubl-00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson