Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury foreman stays on case through loss of son
Balmer Sun via Myrtle Beach online ^ | 6/21/2005 | Julie Bykowicz

Posted on 06/21/2005 2:33:42 PM PDT by lainie

BALTIMORE - On Day 2 of deliberations in a city murder case, the jury foreman passed an unusual note to the judge: "After arriving home from jury duties I found out my son had been [shot] in the head."

There was more: "I am prepared to continue if this is your will."

Even as his only son lay dying in the hospital, Bobby Anderson Sr. kept deliberating with 11 fellow jurors. A day later, Anderson came to court with another message for Baltimore Circuit Judge David Young.

His son had died overnight.

He still didn't want to give up jury duty. "I wanted to see this through," Anderson said in an interview about the trial that ended this month.

...

Perhaps that's why many of the jurors became agitated when one holdout juror wouldn't change her mind.

Everybody took a turn trying to convince her, Anderson said, and they pressed her for reasons why she didn't feel there was enough evidence.

She wouldn't budge.

Anderson said he spent about three hours discussing the case with the woman.

Finally, she told him she didn't feel as though she could sit in judgment. She quoted Scripture.

Later that afternoon, the deadlocked jury sent a note to the bench. "Judge, we are still unable to reach an agreeable verdict as one of the jurors states she cannot judge the defendant because of her religious beliefs."

After receiving the note, Young declared a mistrial and reset the case for August.

Some of the jurors cried out of frustration. Anderson went home to bury his son.

(Excerpt) Read more at myrtlebeachonline.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: juryduty
"I am prepared to continue if this is your will."

This deference for a Baltimore circuit judge? (shaking head)

1 posted on 06/21/2005 2:33:43 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lainie

I thought one of the questions they ask you about jury duty is if you have any problems rendering a verdict. If this woman had religious objections to sitting judgement, she should have stated them during voir dire.


2 posted on 06/21/2005 2:36:44 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Finally, she told him she didn't feel as though she could sit in judgment.

Isn't it one's relationship to God that we are not supposed to judge? There is nothing wrong with judging someones earthly activities.

3 posted on 06/21/2005 2:38:01 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Finally, she told him she didn't feel as though she could sit in judgment. She quoted Scripture.

Next time they ask if there is any reason you can't serve, open your piehole.

4 posted on 06/21/2005 2:38:12 PM PDT by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainie

I've always wanted to serve on a jury but I've never been summoned. =(


5 posted on 06/21/2005 2:40:56 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Wanna take my spot in Georgia on the 27th? :)


6 posted on 06/21/2005 2:42:20 PM PDT by TBarnett34 (What part of "up or down" do you RINOs not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lainie

This woman should have never been seated on a jury. Can't sit in judgement? Sheeeeeeeesh.


7 posted on 06/21/2005 2:42:27 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

I"d be happy to have shared one of the 5 summons for jury duty I've received over the last 10 years.

I don't know about elsewhere, but in this neck of the woods once you're on a list you're more likely to be called again (and again and again.) Seems strange when so many haven't even been called once.


8 posted on 06/21/2005 2:47:11 PM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lainie

They should have dismissed that "christian" twit and let an alternate who knows what jury duty means finish it out. Isn't that what alternates are for?!


9 posted on 06/21/2005 2:54:22 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Read the red! www.readthered.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore
don't know about elsewhere, but in this neck of the woods once you're on a list you're more likely to be called again (and again and again.) Seems strange when so many haven't even been called once.

Does not seem to matter, around here, whether the summons is for State or federal jury duty.  Can't say I've been tapped by either to the point of annoyance, but I am about to receive a federal summons for the third time.  No one I know has ever been called by the feds.

With respect to this post, I'm afraid if I were that juror, the judge would have received a call from the hospital.  "Sorry, your honor.  This is a bit more important.  Call one of the alternates."

10 posted on 06/21/2005 2:57:09 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

That anxious to fry somebunny ? :-D


11 posted on 06/21/2005 2:58:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (*Gregoire is French for Stealing an Election*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

As someone who's done a lot of work with trials and the court system, jury deliberations are the one part of the system I've never seen. Likely, I never will; having worked in a prosecutor's office for ten years (and about to become an attorney), I will probably get bounced quickly. I hold out some hope for a civil case, though...


12 posted on 06/21/2005 3:01:04 PM PDT by pleasedontzotme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Same thing happened with another Baltimore Jury I sat on in the early eighties. Senior citizen could not convict a rapist because he could not send that young man to prison.
It was frustrating, but he eventually gave in.


13 posted on 06/21/2005 3:30:54 PM PDT by catonsville (If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans for the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: catonsville

LOL!!!! LOVE your tagline!!!


14 posted on 06/21/2005 3:35:22 PM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
"Next time they ask if there is any reason you can't serve, open your piehole."

Exactly. Further, I wondered if she feels the least bit of remorse in knowing that due to her predetermined beliefs on her right to judge, this seemingly great citizen lost the last minutes with his dying son. People such as this should be fined for stupidity.
15 posted on 06/21/2005 3:44:09 PM PDT by lt.america (Captain was already taken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lainie


Persoanlly I think he's a lame ass excuse for a father. What the heck kind of man would leave his family to suffer thru the death of his child to sit on a frikkin jury. I'm totally disgusted by this moron.


16 posted on 06/21/2005 3:47:04 PM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore

I only have had to do a 2 week stretch. I had to be on 7 juries during that time though.


17 posted on 06/21/2005 4:21:43 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson