Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court destroys the right to private property
Evergreen Freedom Foundation ^ | 6-23-05

Posted on 06/23/2005 12:12:48 PM PDT by truth49

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2005 12:12:49 PM PDT by truth49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truth49

We need a constitutional amendment eliminating the Supreme Court.


2 posted on 06/23/2005 12:13:51 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

TRAITORS!!!!!!!!!


3 posted on 06/23/2005 12:14:15 PM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truth49

The real question is, at what level does a ruling justify judicial Impeachment? Democraps could not standby, because this ruling hits everyone no matter what their political affiliation is!


4 posted on 06/23/2005 12:14:37 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
this is a shocking ruling. i cannot imagine even liberals touting it as a good ruling.

it makes one wonder if our country's fathers should have john locke's provision for the right to own property in the Declaration of Independence, along with the right to life.

i guess they just figured something like this couldn't happen in this country, since an individual's right to own property has always been assumed.

5 posted on 06/23/2005 12:15:34 PM PDT by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Another snippet on this disaster for American rights of ownership ----

The 5-4 ruling represented a defeat for some Connecticut (search) residents whose homes are slated for destruction to make room for an office complex. They argued that cities have no right to take their land except for projects with a clear public use, such as roads or schools, or to revitalize blighted areas.

As a result, cities now have wide power to bulldoze residences for projects such as shopping malls and hotel complexes in order to generate tax revenue.

Writing for the court, Justice John Paul Stevens (search) said local officials, not federal judges, know best in deciding whether a development project will benefit the community. States are within their rights to pass additional laws restricting condemnations if residents are overly burdened, he said.

"The city has carefully formulated an economic development that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including — but by no means limited to — new jobs and increased tax revenue," Stevens wrote in an opinion joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.
-----
As we note the names of the supporting leftist activist justices. Yes, more power to the government at your expense of freedoms and protection of your property rights. If this does not SHOW TO THE WORLD what a platform for socialist judicial activism that the Supreme Court has become, they deserve what they are getting....SOCIALISM FOR THE UNITED STATES.


6 posted on 06/23/2005 12:16:45 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Chairman Mao's General Store coming to your backyard...

now where did I put that "Chinese For Dummies" book???

ain't it time for some of these Lefties with the Supremes to retire or die!!!


7 posted on 06/23/2005 12:17:05 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
We need a constitutional amendment eliminating the Supreme Court.

But then the legislatures could keep doing things like abusing eminent domain, and there'd be NO CHANCE to stop them with the courts ...

8 posted on 06/23/2005 12:17:14 PM PDT by bobhoskins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truth49

Disgusting. Our Constitution now has barely more practical meaning than those of China and the former USSR.


9 posted on 06/23/2005 12:17:25 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49
Beware the politicians with dollar signs in their eyes who are in possession of a piece of paper signed by their fellows.

2AP+
10 posted on 06/23/2005 12:19:15 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildwood
this is a shocking ruling. i cannot imagine even liberals touting it as a good ruling.

Believe it our not, the people are DU are as disgusted as we are at the ruling. The only thing different is they know it is their own people who made this ruling.

11 posted on 06/23/2005 12:19:49 PM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Democraps could not standby, because this ruling hits everyone no matter what their political affiliation is!

While talking with a friend shortly after this was announced he said almost the identical thing - and he is a Democrat. (but I don't hold that against him)

12 posted on 06/23/2005 12:20:34 PM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
I was lurking at the DUmp, and they are as outraged as us. This goes beyond party lines and is ahuge issue. In translation on freerepublic agreeing with DUmp: Image hosted by Photobucket.com
13 posted on 06/23/2005 12:20:44 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (One man's Linux is another man's OS/2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Start thinking about a campaign, people.. let your senators, congressmen know. Recourse would be by amendment. What a sickening decision.


14 posted on 06/23/2005 12:21:53 PM PDT by buckleyfan (WFB, save us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth49

It is time for Bush
to go to congress
with a simple request
that declares
to the court from the other two branches of government,
with regard to this ruling:

"go ahead, try to enforce it"

and then Bush should put federal marshalls in charge of protecting the private property about which the court made its ruling.


15 posted on 06/23/2005 12:23:48 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I was lurking at the DUmp, and they are as outraged as us. This goes beyond party lines and is ahuge issue.

I'm actually glad to hear that. Like the FEC threatening to censor political websites, this isn't a left vs right issue, it's rent-seeking special interests against private individuals.

16 posted on 06/23/2005 12:24:56 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Democraps could not standby, because this ruling hits everyone no matter what their political affiliation is!

You forget that the Democrats only care about the victims of corporations, NOT victims of government.

17 posted on 06/23/2005 12:25:08 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wildwood
We lay down our lives for this country all over the world to free people from regimes who take property from individuals whenever they chose. We fought England for our rights and we will fight and prevail here too.
18 posted on 06/23/2005 12:25:26 PM PDT by mict42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truth49
Forget flagburning. We need a Constitutional amendment for this.
19 posted on 06/23/2005 12:25:34 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

This rulilng makes it easier for Corporations to get the help of goverment in any possible victimizing.


20 posted on 06/23/2005 12:26:29 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson