Posted on 06/30/2005 10:08:10 AM PDT by nypokerface
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The next road you travel -- and pay a toll to use -- could be privately owned.
Looking for ways to finance highway projects without hitting the public trough, the U.S. Congress appears set to pass a proposal to encourage private ownership of new toll roads.
The provision, part of the highway spending bill now being hammered out by a Senate and House conference committee, would allow private companies to raise up to $15 billion for highway projects with bonds that are exempt from federal income taxes.
While the proposal has broad support in Washington and the business community, the idea of private highways has incited grassroots opposition in some states, with some saying the government -- not a profit-seeking company -- is the proper owner of the public's roads.
Toll road owners such as Spain's Cintra and Australia's Macquarie Infrastructure Group stand to benefit from the move to private infrastructure bonds, since their tax-exempt status would keep interest rates and funding costs low.
The move would also bring lucrative fees to Wall Street banks and others for underwriting and trading tax-exempt debt.
"The time has come for this," Sen. Jim Talent, a Missouri Republican who co-sponsored the proposal, said in a telephone interview. "I think we have an excellent chance of the $15 billion bond issue coming out of conference."
MAJOR SHIFT
While highway spending has traditionally been the government's responsibility, many states faced with tight budgets have given corporations the right to build, operate and maintain roads.
States have the right to regulate toll rates or limit profits, but generally give operators wide latitude to run the roads as they see fit, which concerns some commuters.
Texas, California and Virginia are among the states at the forefront of the movement, one of the most significant changes to the interstate highway network since its inception in the 1950s.
Companies already own projects such as the Chicago Skyway Bridge and the 407 Express that rings Toronto, and interest in privatizing more of the U.S. highway infrastructure is increasing. One bottleneck, however, has been financing.
Jose Lopez De Fuentes, director of Cintra's U.S. and Latin American operation, said private road builders currently face complex regulations governing the issuance of tax-exempt bonds.
The provision expected to emerge from Congress would help Cintra raise funds to finance such projects as a proposed $7 billion investment in the Texas highway system, he said.
Cintra's proposal, which includes a new link on the congested Dallas-San Antonio route, has triggered some opposition, but the state transportation department is ecstatic.
"That's a pretty good deal any way you slice it," said Gaby Garcia, a spokeswoman with the Texas department. "They'll cover the table with $7 billion and say, 'We'll raise that money on our own without any help from you."'
TAPPING THE TAX ROLLS
But Ellen Danning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit who has written on privatization, said private companies are not necessarily more efficient at running roads, and their tolls amount to a regressive tax on highway building.
A better solution to public underfunding of the road system may be to roll back tax cuts that are squeezing the federal budget, Danning said.
"One of the things to ask yourself is, why doesn't the government have the money to spend on the infrastructure that we need?" she said.
And while the private-activity bonds will not require any outlay of public funds, the government would pay for the plan in the form of reduced tax rolls, estimated at $500 million over six years.
In a highway bill that would cost $275 billion or more in that time, $500 million is a small price to pay for a novel financing mechanism that could pay for dozens of projects, said Katherine Hedlund, an Arlington, Virginia-based partner at Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott LLP, which advises state governments on transportation issues.
"Federal funding through gas taxes and state and local taxes are no longer sufficient to maintain our highway assets and to build the additional assets we need to get ourselves out of congestion," Hedlund said.
Private road builders and public-private partnerships can pay out less interest on tax-exempt bonds, reducing the financing costs of projects by 20 percent, she said.
Ed Mortimer, director of transportation infrastructure at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said an additional $15 billion in financing could fund 20 or 30 highway projects.
The proposal could provide a special boost to projects to expand connections between ports or industrial sites and the highways. Such roads are less popular -- but no less important -- than routes used by commuters.
"Sometimes," Mortimer said, "those projects are the hardest ones to get funded."
So does that mean if i get into an accident on one I can sue em?
It means that if your house is where a private company wants to build a road you can say good by to your house.
The private roads will be about as private as shopping malls. Quasi-public. Lots of insurance and legal problems.
Does this mean that some day we might be able to traverse the US with $3001.00 in our pockets without an "excuse" as to WHY we are travelling with "so much cash"?
LOL
There is a private toll road outside of DC. Many roads in foreign countries are private toll roads.
I see a few states that need to be smacked around and given a history lesson. Could it be? After close to 150 years? It's a lot to hope for but....
One time ping for turning back 'internal improvements'. Now as long as they don't ask for the land to be given to them, we're a step further.
maybe they should price shop for cheaper road building crews and material.
Amazing isn't it? "Looking for ways to finance highway projects without hitting the public trough, the U.S. Congress appears set to pass a proposal to encourage private ownership of new toll roads". IOW, we're spending so much money on pork projects that we have nothing left over to fund the infrastructure the taxes were originally meant for. This is just another tax, paid to private companies.....
But the government has MORE money after the tax cuts than before, so rolling back the tax cuts will not help create more money for highways. This Danning bimbo knows not what she speaks of.
Someone actually asked you such a thing? wow!
Gee, if this takes off, I wonder if we can expect a decrease in gasoline taxes, vehicle registration/licensing fees, city stickers, etc.
Defund the artists that put crucifixes in piss. End all government studies on the mating habits of feral chipmunks. Fire the IRS (just on principle). That should free up a few billion or so. Call me if you need more money.
>>>"Because the government is too busy giving all the taxpayers money to illegal aliens and welfare programs, thanks to the left wing whacko's."
We have a winner!
Before any state can move to privatization of highways they need to show that all highway funds (state and federal) are being spent on highway affairs and not being spent on general fund items.
Hoppy
Milton Friedmen proposed this back in 1970. Glad to see we are starting to take power away from government control of our roads. The porkbarreling needs to stop.
If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress. Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America.
James Madison
"they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads" (if you missed it in there)
Feeding the idle and foreigners, and providing them health care and education is a court-ordered Federal obligation, but building and maintaining a Public National Transportation System is not?
Beam me up, Scotty!
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.