Skip to comments.
Iraqi Insurgents Seek Talks With US
AFP via Arab News ^
| 2005 Jul 5
Posted on 07/04/2005 5:35:56 PM PDT by Wiz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
When the enemy asks for negotiations, it often means the enemy is exhausted.
1
posted on
07/04/2005 5:35:57 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: Wiz
Wars are finalized when one side outlasts the other.
2
posted on
07/04/2005 5:36:56 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Becki; Dog; Deetes; Gucho; iso; ravingnutter; Straight Vermonter; TexKat
3
posted on
07/04/2005 5:37:00 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: Wiz
We don't need no stinkin' talks. They drop their weapons and surrender. That's all they need to do.
4
posted on
07/04/2005 5:37:20 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Life's a beach - and Liberals are like the sand that gets in your swimsuit...)
To: Wiz
I don't trust them. They talk from both sides of the mouth. They smile, shake hands, and kill you when you turn your back.
To: Wiz
Obviously they don't understand how our system works.
The PRESIDENT is in charge of both foreign policy and military affairs.
Congress don't know nothin' about nothin'... in this or any other matter.
6
posted on
07/04/2005 5:38:55 PM PDT
by
America's Resolve
(Liberal Democrats are liars, cheats and thieves with no morals, scruples, ethics or honor!)
To: Wiz
We will accept nothing but an official initiative from the US Congress with a precise timetable and a binding decision. Let this be clear, Sure, no problem, coming right up.
7
posted on
07/04/2005 5:39:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: Wiz
When the enemy asks for negotiations, it often means the enemy is exhausted.
___________________________________________________
When the enemy asks for negotiations with the military you are right. When the enemy asks for negotiations with Congress, it means they have identified the weak link of underminers in the US government. They may be exhausted too, but it shows they have listened to Durbin, Hagel, Pelosi, Reid etal. who I am sure are shocked, shocked that they enemy views them as the weak link.
8
posted on
07/04/2005 5:39:34 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: Wiz
The Islamokazis can go pound sand.
9
posted on
07/04/2005 5:40:00 PM PDT
by
steveegg
(The regularily-scheduled tagline will not be seen until the FReepathon is over. HURRY UP!!!)
To: Wiz
Hmmmmm.....they deny any sort of dialogue with us......then demand a dialogue with us. Sounds like they wanna save what little face we haven't blown off yet.Personally, I think they just wanna go home now.
To: Wiz
Hmmmmm.....they deny any sort of dialogue with us......then demand a dialogue with us. Sounds like they wanna save what little face we haven't blown off yet.Personally, I think they just wanna go home now.
To: Wiz
Stop attacking our troops and turn in your weapons, then we'll talk. Until then, be prepared to meet allah face-to-face.
12
posted on
07/04/2005 5:41:40 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
To: StuLongIsland
I don't trust them. They talk from both sides of the mouth. They smile, shake hands, and kill you when you turn your back. All perfectly legitimate forms of struggle in Jihad, according to the Koran. Make treaties and break them when it suits your purposes, Muslims are advised. I don't buy a single line of their crap now that I know where they are coming from.
Surrender must be total and unconditional. Any other agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on.
13
posted on
07/04/2005 5:41:57 PM PDT
by
kezekiel
To: Wiz
When the enemy asks for negotiations, it often means the enemy is exhausted.
Usually this is seized upon by the democrats in an effort to allow them to regroup and rearm.
Another tactic from our good friends on the left, it's called "Fighting while negociating", in which one side
(the Terrs) "continue the struggle" while the other,
"must abide by the truce".
We have seen this how many times?
Watch what the left does, how long before calls for "talks"
start?
14
posted on
07/04/2005 5:42:24 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Wiz
We will accept nothing but an official initiative from the US Congress with a precise timetable and a binding decision. Let this be clear, Ibrahim Yusef Al-Shammari said, speaking on behalf of the Islamic Army in Iraq and the Army of the Mujahedeen. These dirtbags are insane! They can burn in the fires of Hades with the rest of their terrorist buddies!
15
posted on
07/04/2005 5:43:57 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: JLS
Exactly right.
And you can bet that a Democrat delegation will meet with these folks, then return to proclaim them only 'patriots' in their own land, as they fight against occupation.
Together with the MSM, they will begin a drumbeat for withdraw from Iraq. Bush wont listen, and this will be the theme of the 2008 elections.
16
posted on
07/04/2005 5:44:10 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Wiz
Great! that means they are exhuasted. I cannot think of a better time to kill the remaining terrorists (I will never refer to them what the MSM calls "insurgents")!
17
posted on
07/04/2005 5:45:29 PM PDT
by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: Wiz
The only negotiation should be "What do you want on your tonbstone."....and I ain't talking pizza!!
18
posted on
07/04/2005 5:45:54 PM PDT
by
FlashBack
(www.teamamericapac.org)
To: airborne
Most Democrats and some Republicans (like Hagel) will ask to sign on the dotted line of surrender (withdrawal).
19
posted on
07/04/2005 5:46:23 PM PDT
by
tomahawk
(http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
To: kezekiel
Agreed. The only "conditions" that need to be negotiated are when and where we will take their unconditional surrender.
We've been burned badly by taking other courses of action in the past. Nothing but total, unconditional, absolute surrender should even be considered.
20
posted on
07/04/2005 5:46:59 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson