NATO To Hold Karadzic's Son Indefinitely

Radio Free Europe ^ | July 8, 2005 | RFE Staff

[A. Pole]

They don't have a case against Milosevic from all the crap I've seen presented. The International court is a joke, and Karadzic knows it, the Serbs know it and so does the world.

Amen, amen, amen! That is why the peddlers of this crap are being called Old Crappers (Alter Kakers).

[Alter Kaker]

YOU CLAIM TO KNOW. So show the source of YOUR knowledge. Show me!

You're a Pole, right? What if I said, as the Soviets did, that the Katyn Forest incident never happened. I mean you weren't there, so you don't know for sure, right? What's the difference?

I haven't done the DNA testing, nor do I know how to, but those who have -- the ICMP -- has identified the remains from Srebrenica as being from over 2000 individual Muslim men and boys who mysteriously went missing. If you deny this, you put yourself on the wrong side of history. Don't be a dead-ender.

[Alter Kaker]

Give the sources, not "hundreds", give a few!

I'm afraid I'm confused. I provided a link to hundreds of recent newspaper articles, every one of which was on the Srebrenica massacre, and I provided contact information for the international body that did the forensics work. What else do you want? (BTW, I can provide schematics to Nazi crematoria if there are any other Eastern European genocides you're looking to deny.)

[A. Pole]

You're a Pole, right? What if I said, as the Soviets did, that the Katyn Forest incident never happened. I mean you weren't there, so you don't know for sure, right? What's the difference?

The difference is that Katyn Forest incident did take place. The Srebrenica "genocide" was a hoax.

Your false reasoning is:

1. Event A happened.
2. Some people claim that event A did not happen.
3. Some people claim that event B did not happen.
4. Your conclusion is that B happened.

Reduced to more abstract formular your reasoning is:

1. A
2. A is C
3. B is C
4. B.

Or:

If A and B have something in commong then if A is true so B is true.

Or:

If A and B share one property then they must share every other property. They would have to be indentical and be one thing (two things must differ at least in their identity) in the end [skipping few steps] you would have to claim that there is only one being.

Are you a follower of Parmenides by any chance?

[A. Pole]

I'm afraid I'm confused. I provided a link to hundreds of recent newspaper articles, every one of which was on the Srebrenica massacre

Yes, you are confused. It could be expected from an alter kaker.

What you did was to provide the link to the Google search. I can do the same, getting hundreds of links: Google: Srebrenica massacre is a hoax

[ma bell]

bump

[norton]

"Bill Clinton was the lawfully elected President of the United States. I don't like the man, I certainly didn't support him, but that's a fact. And the fact is, you're accusing the United States, its military, and its elected leaders of war crimes, a tactic generally favored only by Chomskyites and their slope-browed ilk in Europe and the Arab Street."

At last you got something right - I DO accuse Clinton and his entire cast of enablers of a war crime. No, of several war crimes when you include selling secrets to the Chinese, giving Osama a pass, and all the rest of it.

And, as the man said earlier, if you can prove the scale of war crimes you allege against Karadzic, give the ICC a big hand 'cause they can't get close with Milo and they've had years to work on it.

Finally, holding someone's son hostage went out of fashion years ago in the west - only the lefts fascist double standards would allow for it today.