Posted on 07/19/2005 4:44:48 PM PDT by freedrudge
Edited on 07/19/2005 4:52:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
President Bush has chosen federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. as his nominee to the Supreme Court, a senior administration official says...
Superior choice for our Supremes!
He was tops in his Harvard Law class.
Ok, news says duringhis tenure in Justice, that he wrote several pro-life briefs (good). Anyone know if he has any legal history on 2nd Amendment issues?
Comments on Roberts from two weeks ago, on redstate.org
http://www.redstate.org/story/2005/7/5/91935/56530
Judge John Roberts Rising
By: Erick · Section: SCOTUS
Heading into this week, here is how things appear to be shaping up with the judicial nomination process.
The White House is currently debating the type of nominee it wants. Part of this has to do with the filibuster. If the White House choses the standard white guy approach, it increases the likelihood that the filibuster will be used and increases the likelihood the filibuster will be annihilated. At the same time, the White House has several people on its list and is still trying to pare them down.
Most troubling for conservatives, sources close to the White House tell me that while the President is out of the country the White House will be feeling out conservatives of the breath and depth of ramifications should Alberto Gonzales be nominated.
Judge John Roberts's name has floated towards the top of the list. The President knows Judge Roberts and feels comfortable with him. Also, with several significant cases involving the government headed to the Supreme Court in the next year, one source very close to the White House suggests that Judge Roberts name is being given active consideration. In particular, I've been given the following points:
Judge Roberts and the President know each other the President is "comfortable" with him.
The judge sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and is therefore very familiar with a host of government related issues that will soon be heading toward the Supreme Court.
Importantly for this White House, Judge Roberts is seen as jurist willing to extend the Executive Branch wide flexibility in both its conduct of general official business and the War on Terror.
The Vice President seems favorable to Judge Roberts given Roberts's propensity to give the Executive Branch some flexibility (Judge Roberts participated in the In re: Cheney decision, which struck a blow to the environmentalists seeking a list of participants in energy task force meetings).
Judge Roberts is one of the few judges most likely to be very controversial to left wing groups, but be seen as a quality judge by both the public and the seven Democrats who signed the filibuster deal.
Notably, Judge Roberts got out of committee in 2003 on a 16-3 vote, which is very strong. He was confirmed to the Court of Appeals by the Senate on May 8, 2003, after several years of Democrat obstruction, but, once to the floor, made it through without significant Democrat obstruction.
Right now, both lefty activist groups and certain White House staffers are turning their eyes toward John Roberts.
Jul 5th, 2005: 09:19:35
Sorry Laura, next time keep your jokes clean.
YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSS
EXCELLENT !!!!!!!!!!!!
Bork lost me when he took Reno's side in the microsoft case....
The industrial strength can of WHOOP ASS has been opened!!!
Sounds good, folks!
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1108389946956
Colson calls Roberts "the smartest lawyer in America," someone who will "approach the cases with an intellectual viewpoint. I don't view him as having an agenda to promote."
But does that mean conservatives can't count on Roberts? "I don't know the answer as to how he would vote on specific issues," says Colson. "I would never ask him, and I hope he never tells anybody what he would do."
Mark Levin, author of "Men in Black," a new conservative critique of the Supreme Court, sees no conflict and is a fan of Roberts. "In the short period he has been on the court, John Roberts has shown he does not bring a personal agenda to his work. He follows the Constitution, and he is excellent."
Ping!
Ralph Neas already saying there are serious problems w/ Roberts. LOL
Is this for real? He is young.
As Mr. Burns would say..."Exxxxcellent..."
In the run up to 9 pm the White House briefs some members of the Senate and, of course, it leaks.
Woo hoo!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.