Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The trouble with Carter
Toronto Free Press ^ | August 5, 2005 | Klaus Rohrich

Posted on 08/09/2005 9:28:54 AM PDT by MikeEdwards

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Screaming_Gerbil
"...TheDemocrats could have run Mickey Mouse and won." Those were my words exactly at the time. Although I voted for Ford, I made a LOT of money betting on the Dem. candidate before the convention.
61 posted on 08/09/2005 10:19:50 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Screaming_Gerbil

With all the Democrats had going for them in 1976, they still almost blew it.


62 posted on 08/09/2005 10:21:04 AM PDT by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
As long as she is an incompetent president, Hilary will be inconvenient, but not very dangerous. It is if she is a competent president that we have to worry.
63 posted on 08/09/2005 10:22:27 AM PDT by chesley (Liberals...What's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Both Carter and Clinton are embarrassments to the South and to the Baptists, who generally have a better handle on how the world really is.


64 posted on 08/09/2005 10:26:01 AM PDT by chesley (Liberals...What's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
I don't think that anyone blamed Ford for Vietnam -- his hands were tied by Congress anyway.

I don't think so either, at least consciously. I think it was more subtle, primitive and psychological, than obvious and political. Whether its an ancient tribe or a modern civilization, the head of government, after a defeat, will loose his crown or office. It's human nature. The complicity of congress is the real factor in the loss of Vietnam, but, deep down, Congress is not a head that will roll all at once. To the electorate, Ford was head of state when the state lost a war. He must go, even if the successor is an unknown.

65 posted on 08/09/2005 10:31:56 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

"You mean it's behind the rabbit?"
"It IS the rabbit!!!"


66 posted on 08/09/2005 10:38:26 AM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Jimmay!

Jimmay?

Jimmay!!
67 posted on 08/09/2005 10:47:09 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
Hey now - without Jimmah gettin' elected we'ed never have had...

BILLY BEER!!


68 posted on 08/09/2005 10:50:45 AM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_D

I was there. People were insanely mad at Nixon and more insanely mad at Ford for pardoning him. A lot of people not just the extreme left wing felt this way. Carter was thought to be an honest man who would clear out the sleaze. I am not defending this I am just telling you the way it was. I didn't vote for Carter.


69 posted on 08/09/2005 10:50:49 AM PDT by RATkiller (I'm not communist, socialist, Democrat nor Republican so don't call me names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

At least we were only fooled once (by 'we' I mean the country, not my family!)...thankfully he had his 4 years and then was kicked out on his lilly-white-Georgia-azz.


70 posted on 08/09/2005 10:56:09 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RATkiller
The Iowa Caucuses put Jimmah Cahtah in the spotlight. He won in Iowa because he swept a bunch of Polk County Courthouse Democrats off their feet and they controlled the caucuses. That's what happened.
71 posted on 08/09/2005 10:57:06 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kurt_D

The alternative was little Jerry Ford. He was a total loser
who cut a back room deal with Nixon. He was no more than
a political hack. None of us knew just how bad Carter would turn out.

I agree that Carter has become a totally worthless socialist
jerk. If my memory is correct, even Clinton didn't think
much of him. It can't get much worse tha that...


72 posted on 08/09/2005 10:57:53 AM PDT by hdstmf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

73 posted on 08/09/2005 11:03:24 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: obnogs
How do you figure that Clinton "inherited" the White House?

H. Ross Perot willed it to him.

74 posted on 08/09/2005 11:43:51 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: elbucko; iconoclast; All
And that, El Bucko, is the unvarnished truth, irrespective of what libertarian trolls like iconoclast would have you believe.

No Perot = No Clinton.

75 posted on 08/09/2005 12:01:12 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: bill1952; elbucko
H. Ross Perot willed it to him.

But wouldn't that reasoning lead us to the conclusion that Bush inherited the White House from Nader?

No Nader = No Bush.

76 posted on 08/09/2005 1:54:05 PM PDT by obnogs (True religion is the life we lead, not the creed we profess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Odd days and even days for buying gas. . .by tag number.
Even numbers got screwed.


77 posted on 08/09/2005 6:06:20 PM PDT by doberville (Angels can fly when they take themselves lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
No Perot = No Clinton.

No Perot = two terms for pops.

A bigger, better head start on globalism.

More great legislation like the Handicapped (or whatever) Americans act.

Nothing wrong with dumping pops, except for nominating the sterling, ultra conservative Dole in '94.

78 posted on 08/09/2005 7:13:56 PM PDT by iconoclast (They Just Don't Get It ... by Colonel David Hunt. Get it. Read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: doberville

Completely forgot about odd/even days ... talk about a lame idea.


79 posted on 08/09/2005 7:35:26 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Followed closely by the fact that he's an idiot and a pu$$y.


80 posted on 08/09/2005 8:00:44 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson