Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Supreme Court continues to rule according to what is politically correct, not what is constitutional. It seems like they understand the difference or more probably they do know the difference, but feel a higher allegiance to political correctness than they do to the Constitution.
1 posted on 08/14/2005 6:22:24 AM PDT by Shawndell Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Shawndell Green

Jury profiling is a no no! Such crap!


2 posted on 08/14/2005 6:33:20 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green

I put this case on the shoulders of every lawyer and constituionalist. Our system is wretched - it sets cold blooded criminals free, and this is only one case out of millions.

Judges will go home to their McMansions, this killer will walk, and somewhere there lies the grave of that innocent hotel clerk.


3 posted on 08/14/2005 6:42:29 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green
MILLER-EL v. DRETKE

Souter, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Wow! I read Souter's opinion. He's a legal genius and mental giant;
"The same is true for another kind of disparate questioning, which might fairly be called trickery"

(Oh no, not "trickery"! Mercy me and heavens to Betsy )

Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, J., joined.

And here's what Justice Thomas wrote in dissent. You know, the guy who Harry Reid called an idiot....
"For nearly 20 years now, Miller-El has contended that prosecutors peremptorily struck potential jurors on the basis of race. In that time, seven state and six federal judges have reviewed the evidence and found no error. This Court concludes otherwise, because it relies on evidence never presented to the Texas state courts. That evidence does not, much less "clear[ly] and convincing[ly]," show that the State racially discriminated against potential jurors. 28 U. S. C. §2254(e)(1). However, we ought not even to consider it: In deciding whether to grant Miller-El relief, we may look only to "the evidence presented in the State court proceeding." §2254(d)(2).

The majority ignores that restriction on our review to grant Miller-El relief. I respectfully dissent.

So once again the liberal faction of SCOTUS ignores the law and rules on 'feelings' - "Awww gee whiz, Texas didn't play fair, they "tricked" the defense."

6 posted on 08/14/2005 7:09:08 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green
Statement: "Dallas District Attorney Bill Hill says the high court's decision in June doesn't question the guilt of Miller-El, a black defendant accused of killing a white hotel clerk and wounding another during a robbery."

Response: Apparently he is guilty irrespective of the jury makeup.

9 posted on 08/14/2005 7:14:06 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green

This is one of the fallacies of leaving killers on death row too long. Convicted killers should be executed within 1 year of their sentencing. If this pig had been executed in a timely fashion he would have been eaten by the worms by now.


10 posted on 08/14/2005 7:15:01 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green

By all means - free all the killers, as they were tried by jurys (sp?) of non-killers.

Why stop there? Why not free all the pedophiles, convicted by non-pedophiles.

The court wrongly assumes this works to reduce racism in the country. This reinforces blacks' feeling/culture of victimhood, while demonstrating to whites that the government and courts are biased to protect blacks. The result of their actions is a known black murderer of a white man potentially walking free. Continued Black on White violence of the extent and nature it has been for the last 30 years is going to start to be noticed.

This is not helping black people. And it isn't helping whites treat them as equals, either.

Diva's Husband


11 posted on 08/14/2005 7:21:18 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (Code pink stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shawndell Green
"The ruling was not retroactive,"

Would not a retroactive ruling constiute an ex-postfacto law?

17 posted on 08/14/2005 9:20:44 AM PDT by AntiBurr ("Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam " with apologies to Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson