Skip to comments.Cindy Sheehan: 35% Favorable 38% Unfavorable (Rasmussen)
Posted on 08/19/2005 6:10:23 AM PDT by slowhand520
I know this polls is ridiculous but......
August 19, 2005--Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother who maintained an anti-War protest outside of President Bush's ranch, is viewed favorably by 35% of Americans and unfavorably by 38%.
Sheehan is viewed favorably by 34% of men and 35% of women. Forty-two percent (42%) of men and 34% of women have an unfavorable view.
In general, people see in Sheehan what they want to see. Opinion about Sheehan is largely based upon views of the War, rather than views about the woman herself. Democrats, by a 56% to 18% margin, have a favorable opinion. Republicans, by a 64% to 16% margin, have an unfavorable view. Those not affiliated with either major party are evenly divided.
People who think we should withdraw troops from Iraq now have a positive opinion of Sheehan (59% favorable , 12% unfavorable). Those who do not think we should withdraw at this time have a negative view (15% favorable , 64% unfavorable).
Among those with family members who have served in the military, Sheehan is viewed favorably by 31% and unfavorably by 48%.
Forty-two percent (42%) of Married Americans have an unfavorable opinion of Sheehan while 33% have a favorable opinion. Among those who are not married, Sheehan's numbers are 38% favorable and 30% favorable.
Fifty-five percent (55%) of Americans say they are following the Sheehan story somewhat or very closely. That is a lower level of interest than Americans have in stories about Iran's nuclear capabilities. It is roughly comparable to the interest in stories about Supreme Court nominee John Roberts.
News reports said that Sheehan left Texas yesterday (Thursday) to be with her mother who had suffered a stroke. Sheehan vowed to return as soon as possible.
Demographic details available for Premium Members.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
Rasmussen Reports was the nation's most accurate polling firm during the Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
During Election 2004, RasmussenReports.com was also the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
To keep up with our latest releases, be sure to visit the Rasmussen Reports Home Page.
Yea and thats with the MSM giving only favorable accounts of what she is doing!
And 28% want to know which reality show she's on?
This is bad news for Libs. Her unfavorables are only going to get worse as she gets more camera time and her looney statements get out. She better hurry, there is only a couple of weeks left before the bored media folks get back to D.C.
Gonna break Don Imus and Frank Rich's hearts but perhaps they can comfort each other.
I feel sorry for her. Losing a child has got to be the worst thing that could ever happen. I think the grief has really made her lose her mind.
Spend the night at Cindy's house with all her crazy friends.
Our society is SO screwed up.
You mean what I have been watching hasn't been "Survivor: Crawford."
I can't bring myself to feel the least bit sorry for this woman. She's virtually destroyed her son's legacy as well as her family through her liberal antics. If anything she makes me ill.
EXACTLY! Good point.
Yeah, since the MSM can't seem to report the news accurately. I was watching traffic and weather this morning and found myself screaming at the TV when in a blurb they announced she had to leave her vigil waiting for a meeting with the President after losing her son in Iraq. "2ND MEETING YOU NON-REPORTING TWIT!!"
Oh that game was great. Day of the Tentacles was just as funny and good!
I've always been of the opinion (once I read her rants) that the more attention she gets, the better.
Glad you liked it ! :)
Is it possible that 15% "favorable" reflect the feelings of those who believe that Cindy's antics are exposing the true nature of the left? (I could be in favor of that!) If so, then her true "favorables" really plummet!
He calls himself "Patient Zero."
His use of duct tape would suggest the lad is sometimes a bit wobbly on his feet.
How long before Sheehan is turned into a "reality" program? Ironically, it will probably show up on Fox.
How long can you stand in a ditch before covertly moving to a hotel?
Why is a poll inappropriate? She's the spokesman for a political movement; it's perfectly natural to poll about reactions to her, same as polling about reactions to Howard Dean or Karl Rove. Just because it's a crackpot, perfidious political movement doesn't mean it's not a real movement that's worth tracking.
That guy looks like Carrot Top strung out on meth.
I don't think a Sheehan poll is inappropriate. I think it's ridiculous.
Yes, but what are the internals? And on what day of the week was this taken? If the weekend, Republicans being more afluent are always away from home.......
The commentary on FR is second to none.
all this time I thought Carrot top was strung out on meth.
Wow. He wouldn't last long if he showed up on my street!
You'd be wobbly too, if your other guitar were a syringe.
Happy to contribute!
People who think we should withdraw troops from Iraq now have a positive opinion of Sheehan (59% favorable , 12% unfavorable).
So, then, 12% of the Pull-em-out moonbats don't like her? Why???
Might be because they see her doing more harm than good to their cause?
This poll isn't about Cindy, it's about the MSM.
They've poured their hearts into an illusion and still lose. What is especially interesting is the people unfavorable that are still larger than the Dems, just as on election day. Which brings those polls from the other units like Gallop and AP etc..into severe question (again) because they don't even rank Dem/Rep equally yet alone favor Reps slightly.
This poll (assuming it is accurate and you never know) tells much. First off, despite all the positive coverage, somehow the other side of the story is getting out. Wonder if anyone in the MSM will get the message that their monopoly is ovah! Secondly, despite the MSM trying to tell us that this is a clear indication of a growing anti-war movement, there have been no converts. Those who opposed it before, oppose it now. Same ole groups, same ole "blame America" message.
Finally, this seems to demonstrate that the MSM is misreading their own bogus polls. Lack of support for the handling of the war does not equate for lack of support for the war.
Hmmmm, I wonder if this poll had anything to do with her leaving Crawford, despite her publically stated reason. The libs are so very sensitive to polling.
AOL poll last night with 450,000 + voters had 57% disagreeing with her views and 60% disagreeing with her tactics.
Looks like Cindy's Peace Train is getting de-railed
Wellm her ratings are better than Dubya's this week.
The size of the moonbat contingent in the US is apparently larger than I thought.
Let me guess...a 4% margin of error.
She only has herself to blame for hitching her wagon up with the Michael Moore's and the moveon.org's of the world. Notwithstanding the fact that once the truth arose to the surface about her lunatic fringe left past, people got turned off by it.
You could get 38% of the people in the US believing that Osama was raped by Michael Jackson while playing golf with OJ......Those are the same who agree with the liberal spin.
Nope, Cindy was a faaaaaaaaar lefty, anti-war protestor, long before her eldest son even got out of high school; let alone joined up. Please don't be misled by the MSM! Read ALL of the articles about her here in FR!
The true unfavorables are probably much higher. Rasmussen was good in the last election, but his rating for Bush have been in the 43-44% range lately, so he's obviously been infected with the MSM bias too.
The MSM has tried very hard to resurrect the late 1960s, with this and failed. They never thought that that would happen. LOL