Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vigilante loses border ranch to immigrants
mysanantonio.com ^ | 08/20/2005 | Jesse Bogan

Posted on 08/20/2005 8:15:09 AM PDT by kennedy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: kennedy
The villains in this piece are the LEFT_WING lawyers.

I wonder how $ the illegal aliens got - and how much the lawyers got.

This kind of crap will continue to happen until the USA stops worshiping lawyers and treating them like Lords and Kings.

Don't think that will ever happen though.
21 posted on 08/20/2005 8:35:04 AM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: kennedy

I have read this through several times. Unless I am missing a grievous crime committed by the US citizens, this ruling is absolutely incredible. First, violence committed while defending your property is frequently mischaracterized as criminal. Some states call it a crime to defend your home before the intruder is actually inside the house and in some cases the owner must further justify the amount of force used in defending the the home from within! The Left seems intent on extending the benefits of our Constitution to those who are not only not citizens, but frequently are violent and/or criminal.

It is an unfortunate legacy of the Democrats that our country is starting to be run by the judicial branch and not the legislative branch. And even worse, the judiciary is ignoring the Constitution and are imposing their own personal views.


23 posted on 08/20/2005 8:35:24 AM PDT by FOXFANVOX (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stu Cohen
Work that's difficult to get American's to do for $2.00/hour. American's will do any job for a wage that the free market supports.

Amen, brother.

24 posted on 08/20/2005 8:37:56 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

I'll bet that these two lose this piece of property within a few years... probably for non-payment of taxes. I wonder who'll pick it up ??.


25 posted on 08/20/2005 8:38:23 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Stu Cohen

End Welfare = Labor Supply Problem Solved!


27 posted on 08/20/2005 8:38:49 AM PDT by Thom Pain (I am ant-war, too. Destroy the terrorists & their supporters before we have war here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
work that migrants do. Work that's difficult to get Americans to do

The lies roll out of the child molester's mouth endlessly.

28 posted on 08/20/2005 8:39:38 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Thommas

So they people that are hiring the illegals are ALSO violating the Federal Wage Protection Laws? HUMMM, how interesting.


30 posted on 08/20/2005 8:41:54 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Property owner, in an attempt to protect his property, throws illegal immigrants off his land. Property owner is thrown in jail. Court gives illegal immigrants property owner's land. Yep. It's almost time to take up arms.


31 posted on 08/20/2005 8:45:26 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Crush! Kill! Destroy the heathen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

If this is a remedy that is even legal I would be surprised. It seems another judge overstepped his bounds.


32 posted on 08/20/2005 8:46:07 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Round these parts, Morris Dees is referred to as a lowdown snake. And that's putting it mildly.


33 posted on 08/20/2005 8:46:36 AM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
"They aren't immigrants. They're illegal aliens."

Not according to this quote:
" He said they are in the United States legally with temporary permits as they seek permanent status"

This exemplifies another problem associated with illegal immigration, in many, perhaps too many cases we cannot tell the difference between legal and illegal. So all Hispanics are being painted with the same brush. Control of the border and control of immigration would eliminate this problem.
34 posted on 08/20/2005 8:48:59 AM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs
These migrants weren't gunned down. The issue of being "pistol whipped" was unresolved. I believe most states theoretically allow reasonable force to evict a trespass. However, with judgments such as this, reasonable force is no force.

It seems that the main action prosecuted was the violation of probation/parole which allowed the immigrants a "loophole" of a rebuttable presumption; id est, "his word against yours" swings in favor of the petitioner since the defendant violated a condition of his probation. The poor land owner was dead in the water before the "trial" started.

35 posted on 08/20/2005 8:49:01 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If this invasion continues unchecked, then this is what will probably happen:

36 posted on 08/20/2005 8:49:02 AM PDT by hombre_sincero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Watch as this border ranch becomes a safehouse for more illegals coming over the border.


37 posted on 08/20/2005 8:50:01 AM PDT by NatsFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

They were in the country illegally when the incident happened. They now have money in their pockets and temporary permits.


38 posted on 08/20/2005 8:54:22 AM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face
"He said they are in the United States legally with temporary permits as they seek permanent status"

One should parse this sentence carefully. "They are" is present tense and does not say they were legal at the time of the incident. There is an excellent chance that the plaintiffs' lawyer locked in their legal status post-incident so as to secure their ability to have continued standing in the court and be able to secure ownership of the property. The lawyer is thus able to secure his fee when the property is sold.

A simple step in rationalizing this conjecture is answering the posit of why "legal" immigrants were crossing the border at this defendant's property line?

39 posted on 08/20/2005 8:59:45 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

When a property owner loses his land to the intruder for protecting it, it's time for drastic action. This should be a warning to other property owners on the border.

For fear of being banned or called a racist, I'm not posting what I think they should've done. But I wouldn't have been quite so nice as these guys were.

The gloves are off. This is serious stuff.


40 posted on 08/20/2005 9:09:11 AM PDT by Marauder (You can't stop sheep-killing predators by putting more restrictions on the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson