Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oaths must accommodate all
Sun Sentinel ^ | 08/22/05 | Mohammad Ayoub

Posted on 08/22/2005 4:06:55 PM PDT by Pikamax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2005 4:06:56 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
It's not like this issue hasn't already been addressed. The judge simply misspoke, and so did his critics.

There is no national question here.

2 posted on 08/22/2005 4:09:11 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Wah.


3 posted on 08/22/2005 4:12:50 PM PDT by Thrusher (Remember the Mog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The US Constitution, and most state constitutions, refer to "Oath or Affirmation". Otherwise Quakers couldn't hold office, serve on juries, or testify in court.

Presumably North Carolina has had a few Quakers in court over the years ~ maybe even someone helping slaves runaway.

I think this judge simply doesn't know his precedents.

4 posted on 08/22/2005 4:19:35 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

If I go to court I'm going to request that I be allowed to swear on a stack of Pottery Barn catalogues.


5 posted on 08/22/2005 4:20:49 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

My religion worships uranium....you need to have uranium in the court room to swear me in! (sarcasm)


6 posted on 08/22/2005 4:22:37 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (How does He know what you're gonna do? He had a great view from YOUR cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrusher

Good luck finding "just the right book" for Druids, Wiccan, Satanists, Zoroastrianists, Rastafarians, Caodai, etc etc etc....


7 posted on 08/22/2005 4:24:14 PM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Except Christians. The ACLU and CAIR agree on one thing: life under Sharia means the end of the hated Christians.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
8 posted on 08/22/2005 4:24:48 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Yes. The law says Holy Scriptures like the Bible, not pieces of worthless crap like the supposedly holy quran.


9 posted on 08/22/2005 4:30:20 PM PDT by DoraC (Islam is no peaceful religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Muslims are not content with simply an affirmation. They want their terrorist-supporting and hate-filled religion to be elevated to the level of Christianity and Judaism, that is what this is all about.


10 posted on 08/22/2005 4:32:39 PM PDT by DoraC (Islam is no peaceful religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Muslim should have exactly the same degree of freedom of religion here as Christians have in Muslim countries.


11 posted on 08/22/2005 4:34:00 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The Koran permits lies to infidels. If they use that book in the courtroom, opposing counsel should read that part to the court.


12 posted on 08/22/2005 4:35:10 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The nerve of these %#&*@! worthless Muslim mooches who not only spit on the Founding Fathers and 200 years of tradition; contribute zilch, nada, nothing; then demand to have America change for them??

Thank you Teddy Kennedy and the rest of the leftists for the Immigration "reform" of 1965 of which has since favored Third World dregs with whom America shares NO values...

As though Kennedy and his ilk haven't found MORE ways to eff-up this country.

13 posted on 08/22/2005 4:36:31 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"If I go to court I'm going to request that I be allowed to swear on a stack of Pottery Barn catalogues."

I prefer The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy myself. Although I suppose I could accept Dr Seuses' Green Eggs and Ham as a reasonable substitute.

14 posted on 08/22/2005 4:38:54 PM PDT by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

"opposing counsel should read that part to the court"

I'll second that motion.


15 posted on 08/22/2005 4:39:27 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I am a court reporter in North Carolina; we offer the oath OR affirmation.

Have for 20 years.


16 posted on 08/22/2005 4:40:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoraC
Whatever the law says, it's simply not possible to believe that the North Carolina courts have never had a legal case before them involving a Quaker.

They don't make oaths.

Then there are the snakehandlers out there in the mountains ~ they don't make oaths, and they don't swear on the Bible.

There's no way vast stretches of North Carolina could function if it really did require Oaths taken on Bibles.

17 posted on 08/22/2005 4:41:25 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoraC

Whether or not they are content with affirmations, no one in America is required to swear an oath on a Bible. That's been the case since 1790.


18 posted on 08/22/2005 4:42:31 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"For obvious reasons, letting Muslims swear by the Quran would ensure that their oath is sincere and truthful."

Hmmmm... what "obvious" reasons would that be I wonder?

Does Mr. Ayoub know of the principle of Al-Takeyya?

jw

19 posted on 08/22/2005 4:42:36 PM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoraC
"They [Muslims] want their terrorist-supporting and hate-filled religion to be elevated to the level of Christianity and Judaism, that is what this is all about."

Well, as long as the President refers to them as the "Religion of Peace," Hollywood is afraid to run a "Muslim terrorist" storyline because of CAIR and Zogby, Islam is taught in some public schools, and conservative radio talk show hosts are being fired for "offending" Islam, why shouldn't they be emboldened?

Funny, but ever since 9/11 Islam has as you say actually been elevated as a "great" religion, instead of decried as a dangerously insane death-cult.

20 posted on 08/22/2005 4:43:38 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson